on โ16-04-2014 10:16 AM
on โ17-04-2014 10:39 AM
@lakeland27 wrote:well thats a good thing. he'll enter the job pre-tainted..
seems to be a culture of corruption
on โ17-04-2014 10:39 AM
it seems like it LL, I thought they'd choose the transport minister instead for that reason
interesting times ahead perhaps
on โ17-04-2014 10:43 AM
its been a good week
although i found a tune and a RIP on utube dedicated to a friend i didn't know had passed on.
on โ17-04-2014 12:46 PM
Now he's intimidating a female journalist and calling her madam.
He looked like a deer caught in the headlights at that interview.
Completely out of his depth. Panic written all over his face.
Reminded me of Bush Jr. receiving the news in the classroom about 7/11.
on โ17-04-2014 12:48 PM
freshwater, I think you're right, he was the one who had the list about appointing Girolama to the ports then ultimately signed off on the job on the board with the water board
And didn't the Ports go to that other creature Tripodi?
on โ17-04-2014 01:05 PM
and meanwhile in LNP Queensland.............
http://www.independentaustralia.net/life/life-display/corruption-and-ethics-queensland-style,6393
Corruption and ethics Queensland style
While the ICAC in NSW claims the scalp of a sitting Premier yesterday, concerns increase about the Queensland Government's planned changes to it corruption watchdog, as well as the conduct of its handpicked acting chair. Barrister Alex McKean comments.
DID DR KEN LEVY chuckle quietly to himself as he set in motion the processes to have Ros Bates referred to the Ethics Committee of Parliament? Did he grin or grimace as he signed off on the paperwork to have the troubled MP investigated.
The thought โthere but for the grace of the Premier go Iโ may have crossed his mind as his pen scratched the parchment, consigning Ms Bates to the tender mercies of the Queensland Parliament's Ethics Committee.
But Ros never really had to worry.
The bar is not set all that high in terms of expectations of the ethical conduct of MPs of the Deep North in this savage year of our Lord 2014. It takes an accumulation of allegations of naked corruption, in the style of the unlamented Scott Driscoll to prompt the government into action.
on โ17-04-2014 01:38 PM
he was responsible for the criminal neglect that saw the murder of 4 young men?
This comment has intrigued me ever since I read it. Since it is impossible to murder someone accidentally, the only inference to be drawn from it is that Kevin Rudd set out deliberately to kill four random young men and procured hired assassins to do the job for him
This begs three rather important questions:
1)Why did Kevin Rudd want these four young men murdered - what did he hope to gain by their deaths?
2) Who procured the murderers for him and why did they agree to do it?
3) Could it possibly be that in fact there was no murder and the word was merely injected into the post in a fit of hysterics?
on โ17-04-2014 01:43 PM
on โ17-04-2014 01:45 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:he was responsible for the criminal neglect that saw the murder of 4 young men?
This comment has intrigued me ever since I read it. Since it is impossible to murder someone accidentally, the only inference to be drawn from it is that Kevin Rudd set out deliberately to kill four random young men and procured hired assassins to do the job for him
This begs three rather important questions:
1)Why did Kevin Rudd want these four young men murdered - what did he hope to gain by their deaths?
2) Who procured the murderers for him and why did they agree to do it?
3) Could it possibly be that in fact there was no murder and the word was merely injected into the post in a fit of hysterics?
I pick 3 too
on โ17-04-2014 02:11 PM
might pick the 100