Anti-Islam party to contest next election Australian Liberty Alliance

[nero_bolt]

CONTROVERSIAL anti-Islam Dutch MP Geert Wilders has revealed that a new party defending western values will be launched in Australia.

In a Youtube message, Mr Wilders said he would visit Perth next year to help launch the

Australian Liberty Alliance, which he described as a freedom party.

“Many of you are disappointed with current political parties and have had enough of politicians who sell out western civilisation,” he said.

Mr Wilders, whose Freedom Party is popular in the Netherlands, was the subject of rowdy protests by far Left groups when he toured Australia in February last year.

His views were condemned by several political leaders and in some cases he had to find new meeting venues when worried hosts cancelled bookings.

His visit was sponsored by the Q Society, an Australian “Islam-critical” group which is organising an international seminar this weekend in Melbourne.

http://www.news.com.au/national/australian-liberty-alliance-backed-by-antiislam-dutch-mp-geert-wilde...

[silverfaun]

I don't remember any problem with the so called Al Grassby like muti culturalism before we accepted so many middle eastern criminal drug dealers and gun importers  in, then a lot of Australians turned against them.

The 9/11 attack didn't endear muslims too much either.

[nero_bolt]

---

@georgiajake2010 wrote:
Well - the list is long. Your old so your will be long gone by the time Australia takes back it's borders and realise multiculturalism is destroying this country. It isn't working in the UK so why would it work here! It's not!

---

out of curiosity did you mean to reply to me with this one as I am not old and you have directed your reply to me? rather odd or did you mean to reply to someone else?? 

[silverfaun]

---

@georgiajake2010 wrote:
Well - the list is long. Your old so your will be long gone by the time Australia takes back it's borders and realise multiculturalism is destroying this country. It isn't working in the UK so why would it work here! It's not!

---

 I think your confusing age with leftist/Green mindset and their stance on open borders.  So put the age card away and target the ones who deserve your scorn.

No insult or offence intended.

[love*today]

Nero, pretty sure Georgia is just using ur op to answer from and her responses are to the post above hers.

[silverfaun]

---

@love*today wrote:
Nero, pretty sure Georgia is just using ur op to answer from and her responses are to the post above hers.

---

Yep her answer was targeted to another poster not nero. Good answer though ..lol

[love*today]

Very long read for sure, have bookmarked it......agree with what I've read so far 😕

[the_great_she_elephant]

georgiajake2010 wrote:
Well - the list is long. Your old so your will be long gone by the time Australia takes back it's borders and realise multiculturalism is destroying this country. It isn't working in the UK so why would it work here! It's not!

---

I may be old, Georgia - in fact there is no may be about it, I am old 72 to be exact, but I have children and grandchildren, and a great great grandson who wiho may even be around at the turn of the next century - whichgives me a stake in the furture and renders your comment a trifle irrelevant. (yes, Nero it was me she was refering to so there is no needfor you  to get upset - she's still on your side)

With regard to anti Islamic policies, simply mumbling that  your list is long, is quite frankly a cop-out. So far this potential party which  you have stated you would support does not appear to have announced any policies. Aren't you curious to know exatly whatt they plan to do for you? l I have suggested a list of what I assume would be the logical ones #58.  Perhaps you would like to comment n that list -  tell us which ones you agree with, with ones you disgree with and which further ones you would like to see added to the list. It's called putting your money where your mouth is - or standing up to be counted.

[acacia_pycnantha]

I doubt that any such party would be allowed to register in the first place. Anti-vilification laws etc etc.

[izabsmiling]

---

@acacia_pycnantha wrote:

I doubt that any such party would be allowed to register in the first place. Anti-vilification laws etc etc.

---

Were they on the hit list to go ? 

This party is OK to change' Australian values (the ones set out officially in writing) by it's very existance.

Imagine if it was related to the Jewish faith.How far would they get ?

[izabsmiling]

---

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

I read the link in the OP but noticed it said very little about what the actual policies of this party might be. So I got to thinking: what would be the logical platform of an anti-Islam party?

This is what I came up with - please feel free to add your own ideas if you think I've missed anything.

1) The burqa would have to go, and the hijab and possibly all long, loose fiting, figure concealing garments. (this might cause a problem for larger ladies who like to wear a kaftan, but I'm sure they would be prepared to make the necessary sacrifice in the name of cultural purity.

2) Islamic schools would be closed down and Muslim children made to atend public schools where they can be instructed in Australian values.

3) All mosques to be closed. (it is well known that they are all  training grounds for terrorists)  And daily prayers banned. Actually, the more logical step would be to declare Islam itself an illegal organisation and follow Campbell Newmans's example by:

4) Making it illegal to associate with known Muslims. (we could set up an UnAustralian Activities Committee to winkle out 'fellow travellers') and

5) Making it illegal for Muslims to work in certain professions, e.g. teaching (we can't have them secretly indoctrinating our children, counselling (more possible avenues for indoctring the vulnerable), the police force and armed services (we can't have them carrying guns.)

Other laws could include

6) Making it illegal to label any food e.g. Vegemite of chocolates halal

7) Forbidding the speaking of any "Muslim" language in public.

Of coursee, one side-effect of these laws would be to make it very difficult to recognise the closet Muslims in our midst, and this could be a worry because although you can compel someone to conform outwardly, you can't control what is going on in their minds - and we all know what devious little minds these people have. The most practical solution to this problem would be to compel them to wear, whenever in public,  an arm band bearing the crescent moon and star.

---

Thanks for adding this .

I wouldn't vote for the arm band  (as I doubt you would)...It's frightening to feel that some Australians might