on โ09-05-2011 08:02 AM
on โ26-05-2011 07:18 AM
I keep two family trees.....one tree I am 100% sure of all the people in it....they have been confirmed by certificates and other sources.....it has about 700 people in it and goes back to 1747 on Mums side.....and 1800 on Dads side.
I also have another tree which has about 1100 people in it....all of whom are most likely mine.
I like to knwo about the people I put in my trees ....so I have spent a lot of time researching about the places they lived.....but that is also because I have a passion for History........and I especially love the convict stories
on โ26-05-2011 07:23 AM
on โ26-05-2011 11:25 AM
on โ26-05-2011 12:00 PM
An Aunt of mine had always told me when I was a kid that we were related to royalty on her Dad's side - apparently he was descended from the Duchess of Argyle.
It actually turned out that the Duchess of Argyle was the name of the ship that the immigrants travelled from Glasgow to New Zealand on :^O
on โ26-05-2011 12:11 PM
An Aunt of mine had always told me when I was a kid that we were related to royalty on her Dad's side - apparently he was descended from the Duchess of Argyle.
It actually turned out that the Duchess of Argyle was the name of the ship that the immigrants travelled from Glasgow to New Zealand on :^O
on โ26-05-2011 02:27 PM
on โ26-05-2011 03:54 PM
on โ26-05-2011 07:54 PM
on โ27-05-2011 08:48 AM
:^O What a classic, Amber! And it just shows how easily family history can become distorted.
My great, great gfrandmother on my dad's side was a foundling, left on the steps of a workhouse and was given the surname Bufton, after the matron there.
on โ27-05-2011 08:51 AM