on โ09-05-2011 08:02 AM
on โ15-06-2013 10:04 PM
She wasn't a convict was she Clair..........I am not sure when the stopped sending convicts to WA...............I know it was 1853 in Tasmania.
on โ15-06-2013 10:13 PM
Don't know?! I'm really thinking she came out on one of these "Bride Ships" but were they female convicts on the bride ships?
I've just been googling the ships to WA, the year she arrived her ship name was a bride ship, the one after was definitely a convict ship but she came on the earlier ship
on โ15-06-2013 10:15 PM
This is s good site for convicts..............but some names are not on there yet.
http://foundersandsurvivors.org/pubsearch
on โ15-06-2013 10:20 PM
On a quick search I couldn't find anything? There are so many variations of her maiden name
Great link though
I will keep digging
on โ15-06-2013 10:24 PM
Actually is that Tasmanian convicts only?
on โ15-06-2013 10:30 PM
I just found this:
Western Australia 's convict system differed from the eastern seaboard's schemes. WA refused to take female convicts
?
on โ15-06-2013 10:34 PM
I never knew that...............I also never bothered to look if that site include all of Australia......as I was only interested in Tasmanian convicts.
on โ16-06-2013 06:12 PM
I wish I could find out more about these Bride Ships.
I have emailed WA Maritime Museum who got back to me right away but told me to try the State Archives because Colonial Government records are kept at the State Archives rather than in Museums.
I think maybe Bride ships were only to W.A.? If W.A. didn't accept female convicts then maybe that's why they had the bride ships?
on โ16-06-2013 06:54 PM
on โ16-06-2013 07:10 PM
I do!