Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?

and why?

Photobucket
Message 1 of 61
Latest reply
60 REPLIES 60

Re: Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?

Three names you overlooked from your list of “BADDIES” add these to your Libs + Nats

 

JOH BJELKE-PETERSEN – Premier of Queensland (NATIONAL) tried for Perjury over his evidence to the royal commission; the jury failed to reach a verdict and Bjelke-Petersen was deemed too old to face a second trial, pity about that.

 

TERRY LEWIS – Queensland Police Commissioner (NATIONAL)-  convicted and jailed for corruption and forgery as a result of the Fitzgerald Inquiry. He was stripped of his knighthood and other honours and awards in consequence.

 

GRAEME PARKER – Assistant Police Commissioner (NATIONAL) – named and shamed for accepting bribes.

Message 51 of 61
Latest reply

Re: Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?


@silverfaun wrote: Labor is the handout mentality that sees generations of families who have never worked continue to vote Labor.

Do you mean those who voted for the baby bonus?

Who introduced and increased it and who decreased it?

Message 52 of 61
Latest reply

Re: Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?


@freakiness wrote:

@silverfaun wrote: Labor is the handout mentality that sees generations of families who have never worked continue to vote Labor.

Do you mean those who voted for the baby bonus?

Who introduced and increased it and who decreased it?


 

And as they were fond of saying when Swann handed out the cash,all of it spent on pokies,smokes and liquor 🙂

Message 53 of 61
Latest reply

Re: Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?

"I note that your list of prosecuted politicians DOES have a majority of labor politicians by a small lead. However I also note that the majority of those Labor offences were for drink driving rather than for corruption. So actually (if you want to be pedantic)
"a majority of labor politicians by a small lead",   10 Lib/Nats compared to 16 ALP is "small" ? that is not being pedantic INAM, it is maths.

"However I also note that the majority of those Labor offences were for drink driving rather than for corruption. So actually (if you want to be pedantic), the Liberal baddies are somewhat ahead of the Labor baddies."

INAM I suggest you also "note" the total of the jail sentences imposed upon the ALP and LIB/Nats  respectively are 68 years 3 months, and 10 years 3months. Of the ALP total, 32 years 8 months was handed down to 3 ALP parliamentarians for child sex offences

Perhps in light of the above INAM you would wish to amend (correct) your comment "the Liberal baddies are somewhat ahead of the Labor baddies".

DY and B1G splutter, obviously, that they only wish to debate corruption (sans figures) and not a mention of criminal history, sentencing, or child sex offences, where the ALP pollies are well in the lead.

"Things like drink driving, while illegal, is not corruption", true B1G,  but your desire to exclusively highlight corruption pales into significance when you "note" the child sex offences by the ALP politicians.

nɥºɾ

 

 PS
B1G, while you are intent on debating just corruption in politics you should include the trade union movement as it is indistinguishable from the ALP.   Perhaps not,  as in a poll: "The media, trade unions and political parties are seen as Australia’s most corrupt institutions" In that order  !

Message 54 of 61
Latest reply

Re: Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?

 

 PS
B1G, while you are intent on debating just corruption in politics you should include the trade union movement as it is indistinguishable from the ALP.   Perhaps not,  as in a poll: "The media, trade unions and political parties are seen as Australia’s most corrupt institutions" In that order  !

 

 

 "as in a poll", seriously is that it, polls are as meaningless as the constant deflection from the conservatives. Not that I blame them, what is there for them to defend and crow about,  their favoured government has been proving daily that the people who voted for them were sold a dud, a destructive, looking just a bit corrupt, stinking dud. Thanks monman12 for reminding me to start a new thread, Diary of our stinking Govt.

Message 55 of 61
Latest reply

Re: Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?

In the case of Joh,the jury was rigged.
Message 56 of 61
Latest reply

Re: Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?

"seriously is that it, polls are as meaningless as the constant deflection from the conservatives. Not that I blame them"

Actually B1G it was a survey  titled  Perceptions of corruption and ethical conduct and produced by the Australian National University’s Research School of Social Sciences
You have to admit though,  trade unions do fit in well as number 2 after the winners, media,   as those perceived as being corrupt institutions.

 

"the constant deflection from the conservatives" Deflection " pointing out that the ALP politicians have notched up more  jail sentences/time  than the Libs, and among them are 3 child sex  convictions? priorities spring to mind!

 

"Thanks monman12 for reminding me to start a new thread, Diary of our stinking Govt.",  "start" B1G?,  you have done nothing but display and voice  PPTSD symptoms since the Poor Me and Kevin circus act was  kicked out of the political ring. cathartic springs to mind.

nɥºɾ

 

Message 57 of 61
Latest reply

Re: Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?


@monman12 wrote:

"seriously is that it, polls are as meaningless as the constant deflection from the conservatives. Not that I blame them"

Actually B1G it was a survey  titled  Perceptions of corruption and ethical conduct and produced by the Australian National University’s Research School of Social Sciences
You have to admit though,  trade unions do fit in well as number 2 after the winners, media,   as those perceived as being corrupt institutions.

 

"the constant deflection from the conservatives" Deflection " pointing out that the ALP politicians have notched up more  jail sentences/time  than the Libs, and among them are 3 child sex  convictions? priorities spring to mind!

 

"Thanks monman12 for reminding me to start a new thread, Diary of our stinking Govt.",  "start" B1G?,  you have done nothing but display and voice  PPTSD symptoms since the Poor Me and Kevin circus act was  kicked out of the political ring. cathartic springs to mind.

nɥºɾ

 


The jury's out on who is the most corrupt, it's out there every day, the lies, rorts, failures and corruption from Labor is "proven".

 

So all the hyperventaliting by the leftists on here is "deflection" from what they know as the total failure of Labor in govt, the total failure to be honest and the total failure of labor to have a credible argument on anything.

 

labor has been proven to be corrupt all the way to the top, all the way to the Executive and all the way to elected officials and Unions.

 

There is no argument here Labor won hands down.

Message 58 of 61
Latest reply

Re: Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?

You're spot on Spot - Bjelke-Petersen himself was charged with perjury in respect of evidence given to the inquiry. The jury in the case remained deadlocked. In 1992 it was revealed that the jury foreman, Luke Shaw, was a member of the Young Nationals and was identified with the "Friends of Joh" movement. 

Message 59 of 61
Latest reply

Re: Are Liberal or Labor more likely to be corrupt?

http://www.independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/grangegate-and-the-lobbyists-party,639...

 

Grangegate and the Lobbyists' Party

 

The Barry O'Farrell resignation reminds us that the Liberal Party has no purpose other than to enrich its sponsors and mates, writes Bob Ellis.

 

Eighteen months ago, Pyne and Abbott ran out of the chamber to avoid the toxic vote of a man who had spent $6,000 inappropriately.

 

On Thursday, O’Farrell vacated his position, the second most important in the land, because of $3,000 spent inappropriately on a bottle of wine.

 

Mike Baird cannot now have long as leader after Sarah Ferguson asked him did Nick Di Girolamo give him campaign money and get from him, in return, a job he couldn’t do very well; the same Nick Di Girolamo who spent buckets of money on lavish living — taxpapers’ money, that is.

 

Arthur Sinodinos cannot now have long as a Senator after accepting from Nick Di Girolamo $20 million dollars if he ‘persuaded’ O’Farrell to give their sewage company a contract.

 

Hockey and Abbott may not have long as MPs if, as is likely, Di Girolamo gave money to their campaigns, money stolen, that is, from the New South Wales taxpayer. The vultures are circling, the jackals detect the smell of blood on the wind, and the Liberal Party itself may not survive the year.

 

For the Liberal Party is the Lobbyists’ Party, it has no other moral purpose any more. It is there to give contracts to mates who build the airport, and the roads to and from it, and positions to crooks like Di Girolamo who kick back money to it.

 

Nick Greiner, wonderfully, said on Thursday that "of course" he would have accepted a $3,000 bottle of wine, it was how lobbying worked, by which he meant how bribery worked.

Message 60 of 61
Latest reply