Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/australia-turns-back-asylum-seeker-boat-from-i...

 

 

 

Indonesian authorities have quoted the asylum seekers on board saying Australian navy personnel fired shots as part of the operation to turn around the boat carrying 25 people.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/australia-turns-back-asylum-seeker-boat-from-i...

Photobucket
Message 1 of 186
Latest reply
185 REPLIES 185

Re: Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work

If you are disturbed by the current governments purported actions then

 

CONTACT YOUR LOCAL MEMBER, YOUR ELECTED DELEGATE AND VOICE YOUR CONCERNS..... DO NOT TAKE

 

NO FOR AN ANSWER.

 

When you and I (ie the public) delegates power to a political representative, it creates a

 

reciprocal duty that the politician must use that entrusted power in the sole, exclusive interest of the public.

 

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

 

 

Tellingly, new members of Parliament have cautioned against ''Fortress Australia'' in their maiden speeches, making the case for new arrivals and new markets. Clare O'Neil, Labor member for Hotham, described how immigration has ''brought more than 150 cultures'' to Australia peacefully.

 

Angus Taylor, Liberal member for Hume, said Australia ''must boldly expound and stay true to a narrative that explains the benefits of openness'', which includes a ''generous humanitarian program''.

 

 

Clearly, ''Fortress Australia'' bears multiple meanings, whether we think about trade, immigration, or border protection.

 

But they are all related.

 

Militarising some of the issues and some of the discourse may not be a constructive development.

 

It may not help Australia's diplomatic and civil-military relations.

 

It may not help Australia's openness to trade and immigration, which is vital to continued competitive advantage in the global economy.

 

But as long as any government continues to treat Operation Sovereign Borders as a military campaign, we should continue to assess its strengths and failures as such.

 

 

One would hope militarisation has not been pursued in order to control the flow of information. At the end of the day there are human beings on these boats. Their ''on water'' stories will emerge. It just might be that many have fled countries undeniably at war to join the long list of migrants who have helped build and shape Australia for the long term.



atheism is a non prophet organization
Message 11 of 186
Latest reply

Re: Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work

If people are being rescued from the water it is obviously not safe to turn them back 😞

Photobucket
Message 12 of 186
Latest reply

Re: Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work

Where does it say they were firing shots at people?

Message 13 of 186
Latest reply

Re: Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work

what goes up must come down... Do you think they may have been shooting at seagulls.

 

If a bloke is standing in a paddock and I fire a gun OVER his head .... then more than likely i would be charged with

 

attempted murder.

 

 

A case in point..... when a driveby shooting is committed and the only thing shot is the houses roof.

 

If the perpetrators are discovered what do you think they will be charged with?

atheism is a non prophet organization
Message 14 of 186
Latest reply

Re: Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work

They were probably shooting over their heads to fighten and intimidate, we can only guess 😞 I'm asking the question icy 😞

Photobucket
Message 15 of 186
Latest reply

Re: Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work

Right on icy, it is standard proceedure to fire across the bow of a boat that is transgressing Australian waters if they won't stop for boarding or won't turn round.

 

There is nothing notworthy in this until someone is reported as saying the navy was firing AT them, which would not be the case.


Message 16 of 186
Latest reply

Re: Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work


@darksideofthemoon wrote:

Right on icy, it is standard proceedure to fire across the bow of a boat that is transgressing Australian waters if they won't stop for boarding or won't turn round.

 

There is nothing notworthy in this until someone is reported as saying the navy was firing AT them, which would not be the case.


 If we were at war it would be..... however If the boat is in international waters then it is an act of piracy as is boarding a

 

vessel and forcibly moving the boat to another position

 

Would 90 nautical miles from Bathurst Island be considered international waters???

atheism is a non prophet organization
Message 17 of 186
Latest reply

Re: Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work

 

On top of that if a boat has reached australian controlled waters then it behoves the navy boat to accept any plea for

 

asylum and duly assess it as per the convention that our government has agreed.

atheism is a non prophet organization
Message 18 of 186
Latest reply

Re: Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work

Are you serious?
Message 19 of 186
Latest reply

Re: Are the Australian Navy shooting at people? That might work

It is so predictable that people jump to conclusions that they want to believe without doubting the originating source.

 

Has it not occurred to anyone that it is in the interest of a failed unlawful entrant to falsely claim that shots were fired?

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Message 20 of 186
Latest reply