on โ12-07-2014 11:28 AM
Australian convicted terrorist Khaled Sharrouf reportedly continued to receive a disability pension months after arriving on the battlefields of Syria.
Sharrouf, who fled Australia for Syria using his brother's passport on December 6, continued to receive his disability support pension at least until February, about two months after he left Australia to join insurgents fighting the Syrian government, The Weekend Australian says.
The newspaper says revelations that the former Sydney man was paid his regular disability cheque - about $766 a fortnight - long after authorities knew he was gone raise the possibility that the taxpayer may have been inadvertently funding his activities.
It is not clear if Sharrouf accessed the money, the newspaper says, but his journey to Syria took him through Indonesia, Malaysia and Turkey, countries where he would have had ready access to any money paid into his bank account.
Sharrouf was jailed in 2005 for nearly four years for possessing six clocks and 140 batteries connected to a terrorist conspiracy in which 18 men were convicted over plans to attack targets in NSW and Victoria.
He's come full circle hasn't he?
The parents come here to escape war and terror and give their kids a better life. Then the kids go back to the old country keep the viscious circle going.
All at Aussie taxpayers expense.
Very disappointing.
โ12-07-2014 11:37 AM - edited โ12-07-2014 11:38 AM
on โ12-07-2014 11:41 AM
on โ12-07-2014 11:48 AM
So? That would have been around the $3k mark. If he was eligible for the dsp, then he was entitled to receive the payments.
on โ12-07-2014 11:51 AM
@bluecat*dancing wrote:So? That would have been around the $3k mark. If he was eligible for the dsp, then he was entitled to receive the payments.
yes but then who could we demonise (again) this week. and this way you get 2 for 1 - bonus.
on โ12-07-2014 11:52 AM
12 days.......... I wonder what he got for his money? some new batteries?
on โ12-07-2014 11:53 AM
LOL. True.
on โ12-07-2014 12:07 PM
seriously, you people can see nothing wrong with this?
he is too disabled to work, but can go overseas to fight...........right
on โ12-07-2014 12:16 PM
I think people are missing the real issue here.
The question which we should be asking is not why he was being paid after he left, but how did he qualified in the first place.
That is, the activities he is currently undertaking seem to demonstrate a capacity to undertake physical activity well in excess of what one would expect for someone so disabled as to qualify for a disability support pension. So how is it that he qualified in the first place.
Therefore I would think a few embarrassing questions directed towards the certifying doctor may be a good starting point.
on โ12-07-2014 12:18 PM
What is wrong to me is the short sentence he received for plotting terrorist attacks here. There is a certain amount of time that you can be out of the country while on DSP. This is being tightened up and the amount of time is being reduced.