06-01-2014 07:58 PM - edited 06-01-2014 07:59 PM
ACCC chairman Sims argues the benefits of privatisation
An article in this morning's Australian Financial Review, based on an interview with Mr Sims, says that he has called for Federal Government to sell Medibank Private and Australia Post.
However, Mr Sims has told News Radio that he was not advocating for the sale of particular Government-owned businesses.
"Australia Post, that's really an issue for government, I was making a general point this morning, and I'll really leave it at that," he told News Radio's Marius Benson.
"I think there are direct experiences you can draw from the energy sector, but I've really got no parallel from which to comment on Australia Post, or Medibank Private for that matter.
"Mr Sims adds, however, that the only good reason for government ownership is because it has particular social objectives in mind.
"If all you're after is maximum efficiency then there's no question that you'd have those assets owned by the private sector," he argued.
"If you're continuing to own them by government, then that's because you've got some social objective to achieve."If you have a social objective, it's worth specifying what that is, and I suspect there's probably more direct ways to achieve that social objective".
Martin O'Nea, the national assistant secretary of the Communication Workers Union says " Australia Post hasreturned more than $800 million in dividends to taxpayers over the past three years.
He also warns that Australia Post's less profitable but socially useful services, such as relatively affordable and timely mail and parcel deliveries to rural and regional Australia, would likely suffer if it was privatised
."With a privatised Australia Post, would them services that people have seen in the past three years remain the same?" Mr O'Nea asked rhetorically."We'd venture that the experience that regional and rural Australia have had with privatisation in the past would leave them to believe that it certainly wouldn't.
"That is a view shared by the Post Office Agents Association Limited, which represents the owners and operators of licensed post offices, which make up around 75 per cent of Australia Post's network.
"A privatised postal operator would focus on the main population centres at the expense of customers in rural Australia," said its chief executive Ian Kerr.
The association says it received assurances from both major parties ahead of last year's federal election that neither had plans to privatise Australia Post.
The Government has launched a scoping study into the possible sale of Medibank Private, which is due to report next month.
Click Here To View Entire Article
Poor Aussies, so far in debt we'll have to sell off our remaining assets soon, and then how will we repay our loans if all our jobs go overseas or to foreign workers?
07-01-2014 11:47 AM - edited 07-01-2014 11:47 AM
@icyfroth wrote:
@freakiness wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:manageable as in...wer'e at least paying the interest?
or manageable as in...we have to sell of assets and rights to our resouces to pay it off?
We don't HAVE to sell off the assets. We can manage the resources and the assets. They generate income.
Do people sell their houses just to pay off their mortgage if they can afford the mortgage payments?
Hopefully not.
But if they have to take out more credit to finance their living expenses, and then more credit to cover the re-payments of that loan, ran up against circumstances beyond their control and got over their heads, defaulte on their loan, perhaps that would be their only option.
Either that or they'd be out on their ear because the lender has called in the debt.
on 07-01-2014 11:53 AM
@donnashuggy wrote:So why doesn't abbott just STOP THE WASTE like he promised?
he's cut some waste.
on 07-01-2014 11:55 AM
on 07-01-2014 11:58 AM
@crikey*mate wrote:
@donnashuggy wrote:So why doesn't abbott just STOP THE WASTE like he promised?
he's cut some waste.
he has only cut things he doesn't support, mostly labor policies.. can't have those successes around to embarrass.
those policies are only wasteful to a flat earther.
on 07-01-2014 11:58 AM
cutting red tape and streamlining policies and procedures is though.
on 07-01-2014 12:01 PM
@lakeland27 wrote:
@crikey*mate wrote:
@donnashuggy wrote:So why doesn't abbott just STOP THE WASTE like he promised?
he's cut some waste.
he has only cut things he doesn't support, mostly labor policies.. yeah well, I can understand that bit....can't have those successes around to embarrass.
those policies are only wasteful to a flat earther.
that's just not true, at all. (the part I bolded and underlined)
on 07-01-2014 12:02 PM
what successes has he cut?
on 07-01-2014 12:25 PM
It never ceases to amaze me how short some people’s memories are.
Not too long ago the generation and supply of electricity was a public sector function. It was a time when electricity was not only affordable but where all profits were for the benefit of the community as a whole.
Then, with the promise that greater efficiency translates into a better service and lower prices, the Howard Government forced the states to privatise (sell off) this asset. The result, though efficiency improved, the public obtained no benefited from it. Instead the quality of the service actually reduced and we all now pay some of the highest electricity charges in the world. That is, since privatisation, any efficiency gains have not resulted in the promised better service at a lower price. Instead it has resulted in higher profits which benefit a select few, and not the community as a whole. The same goes any simular privatised such as water and telecommunications, and as a community we are all the poorer because of it.
Now we have another Collision Government and it seems we’re in for more of the same.
on 07-01-2014 12:29 PM
surely Aus Post couldn't get any worse?
on 07-01-2014 12:37 PM