on 31-05-2016 10:29 AM
The mother of the little boy who fell into a gorilla enclosure at Cincinnati Zoo has hit back at critics saying society is quick to judge when 'accidents happen'.
Michelle Gregg took to Facebook following a public backlash after 17-year-old Herambe was captured on camera dragging her four-year-old boy, believed to be called Isaiah, around the moated area of the enclosure.
At one point, it appears that Herambe is holding hands with the little boy, as he stands protectively over him shielding him from the screaming crowd.
The silverback gorilla held the boy for about 10 minutes before he was shot by a dangerous animal response team, the head of Cincinnati Zoo said on Saturday.
The boy's mum said on Facebook: “I want to thank everyone for their thoughts and prayers today. What started off as a wonderful day turned into a scary one.
“For those of you that have seen the news or been on social media, that was my son that fell in the gorilla exhibit at the zoo.
"God protected my child until the authorities were able to get to him.
My son is safe and was able to walk away with a concussion and a few scrapes ... no broken bones or internal injuries.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/31717600/witnesses-say-gorilla-was-trying-to-protect-child-after-f...
I dunno...
I think it's sad that such a magnificent animal had to be killed, but it's my opinion the Gorilla would have toyed with the boy until it killed him.
It could have gone either way. I think the Zoo made the right decision.
on 02-06-2016 09:48 PM
I think we can get out of this ... and make a quid
.... the second amendment... and all that jazz....
I have been thinking there would be no PR problem if the toddler actually shot the Gorilla themself.
Does anybody know a leather worker??
They could knock up some baby holsters and we could equip them with Derringers and then hire them out to the toddlers when they entered the zoo.... just on the off chance they found themslves in the wrong place at the right time on the wrong side of an enclosure .... booooom....
Problem solved
on 02-06-2016 10:02 PM
well...
Boy am I glad to see so many gorilla experts here....
(and obviously tremendious parents too!)
on 02-06-2016 10:51 PM
Zoos are places where most people go with small children and i think it is perfectly reasonable to expect that the barriers are good enough to stop kids, too small to know any better, to get inside the enclosures.
The gorilla may have not intended to harm the child, but human child is considerably more fragile than baby gorilla. It is very likely the child would not have ended well if the gorilla was not shot. I am sure that the zoo staff are much better qualified to asses the situation than all the critics.
on 02-06-2016 10:54 PM
Surely alarm bells should have rung with the parents when the kid wanted to go into the water with the gorilla.
Instead of just saying NO I would have taken the youngster firmly by the hand to prevent anything happening. Most parents would recognise that 4 year olds can wriggle though openings that we would not think possible.
I would be very interested to see where he got through the barriers.
on 03-06-2016 06:24 AM
The lawyers defending representing Pittsburgh Zoo tried that defence.
... ie that the parents should have known that their child may fly out of their hands and over the rail to be mauled to death.....
Luckily no one was armed (impossible.. this is America you know) Well.
..... at least..... noone was quick enough to pull out their side arm and shoot bejesus out of the dog.... or we could have
had another dead non human animal
USA lawyer 101 ..... Use social media to deride your opponents.......
PITTSBURGH — The parents of a 2-year-old boy who was fatally mauled after falling into a wild African dogs exhibit have settled their lawsuit against the Pittsburgh zoo.
Attorneys for the boy’s parents, Jason and Elizabeth Derkosh, issued a joint statement Monday with the Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium.
“Details of the settlement will remain confidential. The Derkosh family and the zoo request that the privacy of all parties involved be respected,” the statement said.
The couple’s son, Maddox, lunged from his mother’s grasp and fell some 10 feet from the top of a wooden railing into an enclosed exhibit below in 2012. He had bounced off a net meant to catch falling debris and trash, then into the exhibit, where several dogs fatally attacked him.
The bespectacled boy, who had vision problems, became the only visitor in the zoo’s 116-year history to die.
The Derkoshes sued in May 2013, and the zoo countered in September by arguing his mother was to blame for his death, because she lifted him atop the 4-foot-tall wooden railing that surrounded the raised observation platform so he could get a better look into the exhibit.
“The injuries and damages sustained by Maddox Derkosh, including Maddox Derkosh’s death, were caused solely by the carelessness, negligence, and/or recklessness of Elizabeth Derkosh,” the zoo’s attorney wrote in the court filing.
She “knew or should have known he could fall into the exhibit” and failed “to maintain a proper grasp of Maddox Derkosh after lifting him over the railing.”
The parents’ attorney, Robert Mongeluzzi, said then that the zoo “failed miserably in their solemn responsibility to prevent the attack” and “shamelessly attacked Maddox’s grieving mother.”
In October, Mongeluzzi filed a counterclaim on behalf of Elizabeth Derkosh, which included excerpts from the minutes of several of the zoo’s safety committee meetings since August 2006.
The first excerpt says, “Wild dog exhibit has one side of the exhibit that is open and a visitor was seen dangling a child over the exhibit through the opening.”
According to the court filing, similar observations were brought to the safety committee’s attention on four more occasions by July 2007 — including one that said, “Guest are dangling children over the railing at the Wild Dogs exhibit” — but Mongeluzzi contends the exhibit still was not changed until after Maddox was killed.
Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. investigated the boy’s death and deemed it a “tragic accident,” deciding not to prosecute his mother or zoo officials.
on 03-06-2016 06:33 AM
http://nypost.com/2014/02/02/bronx-zoo-sued-after-child-swallows-free-souvenir-penny/
A bad penny always turns up . . . this time in a toddler’s stomach at the Bronx Zoo.
A promotional gimmick to distribute souvenir coins was anything but penny-wise for one New Jersey family, whose child swallowed the free gift — and was left with serious injuries, according to a lawsuit.
Little Ethan Yi and his family spent every Saturday at the Zoo, and the 3-year-old was especially eager for last summer’s Dinosaur Safari exhibit.
“He’s crazy about dinosaurs,” said his mom, Kelly Yi. “I tried to avoid it, but he was dying to see it.”
So the family forked over $16 for tickets, and the promise of a free gift, for which Ethan and his 5-year-old sister Harin soon began clamoring.
“They kept saying, ‘I want it!’ ” the mom recalled.
The gift for each family member was a pressed penny, imprinted with the words “Dinosaur Safari” and secured with plastic wrapping to a postcard advertising more than 30 similar coins for sale. An employee handed the coin directly to Ethan, according to the Bronx Supreme Court lawsuit.
“I was really disappointed at the time,” said Yi, who thought the gift would be more substantial.
Next thing she knew, Ethan was choking, and the family had three pennies — not four.
“I thought he’d die,” she said.
The panicked mother and her husband, Heung Ju Yi, tried desperately to dislodge the coin from Ethan’s throat but couldn’t, and rushed Ethan to an emergency medical clinic, where X-rays showed the penny had entered the stomach.
“They said it would come out a few days later,” the mom recalled.
A second X-ray the next day showed the penny wasn’t moving, and doctors urged the Palisades Park family to get it removed — the family went to the Hackensack University Hospital ER.
Two days later, the little boy, who had been vomiting and gagging, was put under general anesthesia for two to three hours as a doctor removed the corroded penny via an endoscopy.
The jagged shape of the token stunned Yi.
“The coin was really, really sharp,” she said.
Like a regular penny, it was made of zinc with a thin layer of copper on top. The zinc can react with stomach acid, according to family lawyer Howard Myerowitz.
“Literally within a couple of hours, it starts to dissolve,” he said.
The jagged edge scraped and cut the inside of Ethan’s stomach, and the ordeal cost the uninsured family — the mom is a fabric designer and the dad a skin-care supplies salesman — more than $50,000 in medical bills,
Myerowitz said The family is seeking unspecified damages from the Zoo and the Wildlife Conservation Society, which did not return a message seeking comment.
The Bronx Zoo’s supposed to be a place for kids, said Yi.
“I feel really angry and frustrated at the Bronx Zoo,” she said. “It’s a place where kids play, I thought it was good for kids but it wasn’t.”
The family stopped going to the zoo, said Yi, who wondered why there was no warning about the dangers of swallowing the coins.
“There’s a warning sign for everything. Even the hot coffee has a warning sign,” she said.
on 03-06-2016 08:13 AM
Who cares whether is was the mother or the father who wasnt watching their kid, I care that an innocent animal is dead
on 03-06-2016 09:29 AM
on 03-06-2016 06:16 PM
so you care more about the life of that animal that may (notice i say MAY) have ended up killing that poor child. fault yet to be determined but either way the child fell in and was dragged around the enclosure.
Congrats to the zoo staff for erring on the side of caution and killing the animal.
03-06-2016 06:24 PM - edited 03-06-2016 06:25 PM
I'm gunna say this until the cows come home.......
If the zoo's fence was fixed, nothing would have happened!
Not mum's fault, not dad's fault, not the kid's fault, not the gorilla's fault.
The zoo pre-determined the fate of it's own gorilla
Argue about that