on 16-04-2014 10:15 AM
on 16-04-2014 12:20 PM
I just hope it takes that sleazy shyster and his boss Obeid with him.
But they'd probably have all their skeletons well secured by now.
More fool O'Farrell.
on 16-04-2014 12:25 PM
on 16-04-2014 01:02 PM
@twyngwyn wrote:
well, he didn't deny the note - probably wrote it after drinking a bottle of Grange, seeing as he can't locate it
He has admitted to writing the note although he still can't remember writing it, ICAC were trying to track down the courier anyway. If his memory is so bad he should have resigned before on grounds of incompetence. What else can't he remember?
on 16-04-2014 01:14 PM
A sad end for Barry....
The resignation of NSW premier Barry O’Farrell is one of the most bizarre and dramatic downfalls in recent Australian politics.
In 2011 he won the largest election victory in NSW political history on the back of a tired, chaotic and corrupt Labor government.
For the past three years he has had the easiest run possible, thanks to the work of the Independent Commission against Corruption exposing the corruption of Labor Party figures. His party was coasting towards another big victory next March.
The current ICAC inquiry was supposed to be about yet another example of corruption of the Labor years. But the testimony of the head of the company at the centre of the inquiry, Australian Water Holdings, about the gift of a 1959 bottle of Grange worth $3000 wrong footed the Premier.
He said he no memory of receiving it. He had to, because he had failed to declare it in his pecuniary interest register.
But the ICAC quickly scrambled to get the hard evidence. First they found the reimbursement of the bottle of wine on the Amex card of a staff member. Then they found the courier’s records. And most damagingly, there was a phone call from Mr O’Farrell at 9.30pm on the day the wine was delivered.
Still he denied it, saying he would certainly remember such a gift. Then overnight ICAC turned up a hand written thank-you note, and Mr O’Farrell was gone.
He’s the second premier to be brought down by the ICAC, following Nick Greiner, who created it, being forced to resign following corruption findings which was overturned on appeal.
As the Prime Minister Tony Abbott noted, it was a resignation of honour, as opposed to the Labor ministers who have been found corrupt but continue to deny wrong doing.
Although Mr O’Farrell could face charges of giving false testimony, he seems unlikely to be, given it appears to be a simple, if massive, case of memory loss. Meanwhile, ICAC continues to probe much more serious examples of money, influence and political favours.
on 16-04-2014 01:21 PM
:womanlol
"The current ICAC inquiry was supposed to be about yet another example of corruption of the Labor years"
yes but as history has proven, these things have a habit of catching those who weren't supposed to be caught.![]()
![]()
![]()
on 16-04-2014 04:02 PM
Pandora's Box has been opened.
Anyone given any thought to what direction the Royal commission will go?
I wonder if Gillard, Shorten and the rest of the Labor shonks will have a place to hide?
Mind you it is a good thing that a spotlight is being shone on everyone who is paid by the taxpayer.
I welcome close scrutiny on public figures regardless of political leanings, gender, creed or colour.
on 16-04-2014 04:03 PM
Laugh while you can Boris, i wonder if you will still laugh at the results of the Royal Commission?
on 16-04-2014 04:10 PM
things tend to resonate more if the inquiry focuses on serving current MPs not the past. people tire of expensive smear campaigns focused on people who are no longer there. besides, with current events both sides will be the losers. Palmer and the Greens are the likely beneficiaries ![]()
on 16-04-2014 04:13 PM
By your standards in that case past crimes are ok? Is that a labour attitude?
on 16-04-2014 04:16 PM
No. i'm saying the public view it as ''they're all as bad as each other'' and vote accordingly.
