davidc4430 wrote:
on the news they are calling this guy a terrorist, but although i'm sure those directly involved were terrorised i dont see how you call a single guy killing one person and taking 1 hostage then shooting at police to get himself killed a terror attack in the true meaning of terror attacks.
if he had driven a car into a crowd of people then started shooting people that would be a terror attack.
this seems more like he just went off on the spur of the moment, maybe he was on drugs?
he didnt kill the hostage which id expect a true terrorist to do. they said he came out of the building shooting at police so they killed him.
monis took over a business, held a large group hostage, ranted for hours then shot a hostage. quite different in my view.
This is a man who years back, helped plan a terror attack on an army base back in 2010.
This is a man with a history of violence, witness his jail time for a violent home invasion.
He rang the media to broadcast his allegiance to IS.
He killed one man, had another hostage. His intention was to lure police in and kill as many as possible.
The fact he only managed to kill one person doesn't mean he wasn't a terrorist with a terrorist's intentions. He did manage to shoot 3 police.
They were his primary aim.
IS will appeal to young muslims who have violent dispositions or a chip on their shoulder.
ISIS has just recently asked their supporters to draw infidels into buildings and kill them. This man followed their advice.
He said that he was doing it for ISIS clearly enough before he was shot.
Had he lived, it is perfectly possible he would have killed his hostage & other police.