Craig McLachlan found not guilty

[davidc4430]

Craig McLachlan found not guilty of assault and indecent assault charges

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-12-15/craig-mclachlan-not-guilty-of-assault-indecent-assault-charge...

[**tippy*toes**]

That's (still) wonderful news. I'm so happy for Craig. Onward and upward!

[the_bob_delusion]

Are you sure he is not guilty, did you check, did you really check 1-2?

[**tippy*toes**]

He was found not guilty to all charges in a court of law. The women accusing him failed to provide evidence that could convict him. What more do you want?

[**tippy*toes**]

[the_bob_delusion]

---

@**tippy*toes** wrote:

He was found not guilty to all charges in a court of law. The women accusing him failed to provide evidence that could convict him. What more do you want?

---

Yes, found not guilty in a court of law, that doesn't mean he is innocent.

[**tippy*toes**]

I get that. And Robert Hughes isn't necessarily guilty because a court of law convicts him, either. Based on what, the words of girls thirty years later? Pfffft...

[**tippy*toes**]

Happy family. 

[the_bob_delusion]

---

@**tippy*toes** wrote:

I get that. And Robert Hughes isn't necessarily guilty because a court of law convicts him, either. Based on what, the words of girls thirty years later? Pfffft...

---

Actually he IS found guilty by a court of law. Duh. 

Courts only have to show Guilty or Not Guilty. Not Guilty means that there was not sufficient evidence to determine that he/she did commit the crime and doesn't mean they're innocent. Robert Hughes was found Guilty. 

[**tippy*toes**]

Lol, Bobeh, you missed my point as usual. There is just as much evidence Robert Hughes is guilty as there is that Craig Mclachlan is - meaning zilch. Just the words of a bunch of girls. In both cases you and nobody else can prove what, if anything, happened. Get it?