on โ05-03-2015 06:30 PM
What group would you start with?
on โ05-03-2015 11:39 PM
Donna
on โ05-03-2015 11:40 PM
Do you think drug kings and lords and ladies would be exempt?
on โ05-03-2015 11:44 PM
OMG. I have been dealt an almost fatal blow !!! to be compared with... has cut me to the quick, that is the deepest cut of all.
Even the mere thought of being compared makes me shudder.
on โ05-03-2015 11:48 PM
Lady, to but us in the same post is a scralidge, it is obvious that you are not aware of the long history of ...................and I
on โ05-03-2015 11:51 PM
Sorry poddy.
on โ05-03-2015 11:53 PM
@poddster wrote:Culling addictive drug dealers would be a proactive move so that not so many young people would be affected, it would change the complexion of society and the workforce.;
or alternatively you could cull all the users so there would be no demand, supply would not be profitable so less people would be tempted to venture down the trafficking path.
โ05-03-2015 11:53 PM - edited โ05-03-2015 11:55 PM
on โ05-03-2015 11:58 PM
@am*3 wrote:
@poddster wrote:Do you think drug kings and lords and ladies would be exempt?
You said drug dealers.. drug kin pins don't do 'deals' on the street etc.
Culling addictive drug dealers - what does that suggest that, drug dealers are addicts?
Typo? scralidge
Typo or what?
on โ06-03-2015 12:01 AM
@am*3 wrote:
@poddster wrote:Do you think drug kings and lords and ladies would be exempt?
You said drug dealers.. drug kin pins don't do 'deals' on the street etc.
Culling addictive drug dealers - what does that suggest that, drug dealers are addicts?
Typo? scralidge
Not on the ball tonight am3 ?
Dealers in addictive drugs are addictive drug dealers.
on โ06-03-2015 12:09 AM