on 05-03-2015 06:30 PM
What group would you start with?
on 05-03-2015 11:39 PM
Donna
on 05-03-2015 11:40 PM
Do you think drug kings and lords and ladies would be exempt?
on 05-03-2015 11:44 PM
OMG. I have been dealt an almost fatal blow !!! to be compared with... has cut me to the quick, that is the deepest cut of all.
Even the mere thought of being compared makes me shudder.
on 05-03-2015 11:48 PM
Lady, to but us in the same post is a scralidge, it is obvious that you are not aware of the long history of ...................and I
on 05-03-2015 11:51 PM
Sorry poddy.
on 05-03-2015 11:53 PM
@poddster wrote:Culling addictive drug dealers would be a proactive move so that not so many young people would be affected, it would change the complexion of society and the workforce.;
or alternatively you could cull all the users so there would be no demand, supply would not be profitable so less people would be tempted to venture down the trafficking path.
05-03-2015 11:53 PM - edited 05-03-2015 11:55 PM
on 05-03-2015 11:58 PM
@am*3 wrote:
@poddster wrote:Do you think drug kings and lords and ladies would be exempt?
You said drug dealers.. drug kin pins don't do 'deals' on the street etc.
Culling addictive drug dealers - what does that suggest that, drug dealers are addicts?
Typo? scralidge
Typo or what?
on 06-03-2015 12:01 AM
@am*3 wrote:
@poddster wrote:Do you think drug kings and lords and ladies would be exempt?
You said drug dealers.. drug kin pins don't do 'deals' on the street etc.
Culling addictive drug dealers - what does that suggest that, drug dealers are addicts?
Typo? scralidge
Not on the ball tonight am3 ?
Dealers in addictive drugs are addictive drug dealers.
on 06-03-2015 12:09 AM