on โ20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
on โ10-02-2015 08:49 PM
really?? I don't think anyone knows what's going on, especially the politicians who are making big statements about it
on โ11-02-2015 09:02 AM
Shipyard workers have flown to Canberra to warn Liberal MPs against dumping their election promise to build 12 new submarines in Adelaide.
Before the election, former defence minister David Johnston promised the Coalition would build the next fleet of submarines in Adelaide.
"The Coalition today is committed to building 12 new submarines here in Adelaide," Senator Johnston said on May 8, 2013.
"We will get that task done, and it is a really important task, not just for the Navy but for the nation," he said.
The Government has now said it is committed to letting local companies bid for the work but is in talks which could see it go offshore.
The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union's (AMWU) assistant national secretary Glenn Thompson said shipyard workers meeting Liberal MPs today, including frontbencher Christopher Pyne, want the promise kept.
"Christopher Pyne, like other South Australians and other Liberals in ship building electorates, needs to stand up," Mr Thompson said.
"If they can't get the message that... [if] they don't take steps to secure our Defence capability, our sovereign capability, they are going to be taught a harsh lesson from the electorate."
On Sunday night Prime Minister Tony Abbott, in the hunt for crucial party room votes, confirmed the contract, worth tens of billions of dollars, would be awarded through what he called "a competitive evaluation process".
It secured the support of South Australian Liberal senator Sean Edwards, who said he had a commitment from Mr Abbott for an "open tender" to allow Australian contractors to bid for the work against foreign shipbuilders.
we heard abbott's announcement on Sunday night and at first we also thought the Aus company was getting the tender
it's very deceptive.... tricky even and a sure way to get more votes in a hurry
on โ11-02-2015 11:08 AM
Malcolm Turnbull was sounded out by colleagues, before December's ministerial reshuffle, as to whether he would accept the Treasury portfolio, as senior figures searched for ways to revive the government's flagging performance and sharpen its economic arguments.
The news comes after a day in which confusion gripped the government on several fronts, potentially mocking Mr Abbott's post-spill promise that "good government starts today
it sounds as though the LNP have been plotting to dump Joe Hockey for awhile
on โ11-02-2015 11:10 AM
Tax avoidance is so prevalent across Australia's business sector now it rivals the infamous "bottom of the harbour" tax schemes of the 1970s and 80s, enabled by immoral behaviour from accountants, a former head of the profession's peak body has warned.
John Miller said the infamous "bottom of the harbour" tax schemes back then were "no more scandalous" than some of the aggressive tax minimisation strategies used by multinational companies today.
He said the government had little choice but to enact new laws to combat the scourge of corporate tax avoidance, because it had created a revenue hole in public finances.
โ11-02-2015 11:17 AM - edited โ11-02-2015 11:22 AM
This article from Adelaide newspaper is a good one re the sub tender.
Stuff up No. 1 on first day of good government! Probably because Abbott stuck his nose in by making promises on Sunday to SA Senator Sean Edwards so he wouldn't vote against him if there was a leadership challenge.
Abbott promised tender... Defence .minister says no tender but a "competitive evaluation process. Senator Edwards wants what was promised a tender process.
Defence Minister Kevin Andrews leads Coalition delegation to Adelaide to discuss submarine project - but semantics descend into farce
"Defence Minister Kevin Andrews announced there would be a โcompetitive evaluation processโ but was unable to explain what that would mean and how exactly it was different from a tender process, except to say that a tender process had โa very specific meaningโ.
Doesn't sound like a Minister who knows what they are talking about.
Oh dear, no improvement on the last one.
Senator David Johnston:
"You wonder why I'm worried about ASC and what they're delivering to the Australian taxpayer, you wonder why I wouldn't trust them to build a canoe?" he said.
on โ11-02-2015 11:27 AM
God it's a mess. treachery at it's best
I read somewhere that it was all Labors fault because they used the term 'competitive evaluation process' back in 2003 over something.
Shame I can't find the article now but
on โ11-02-2015 11:39 AM
on โ11-02-2015 11:42 AM
โ11-02-2015 11:49 AM - edited โ11-02-2015 11:49 AM
@am*3 wrote:
Ha, at Labor's fault.
If the policy is to not to use a tender process, then Abbott should not be promising they will use tenders.
6 MP's flying to SA - overkill? They missed an important meeting yesterday too.
not only overkill, but the cost to the tax payer for that trip was $33,000
โ11-02-2015 01:43 PM - edited โ11-02-2015 01:45 PM
Wasting public funds again. Never heard of 6 MP's being needed to accompany a Minister of Defence before.
I wonder how much a High Court case costs currently.
Scott Morrison loses High Court case against a refugee
Former immigration minister Scott Morrison's decision to refuse a Pakistani refugee a protection visa on a "national interest" basis has failed in the High Court.
The court has unanimously found that the man, who arrived by boat on Christmas Island in 2012, be granted a permanent protection visa, which had been previously refused by a delegate of the Minister.
Mr Morrison had argued that because the man had arrived by boat as an "unauthorised maritime arrival" then it was in the national interest that he not be given a visa.
But the High Court argued that this decision was not made according to law and that the then minister could not refuse a visa solely based on the fact that the man had arrived in Australia by boat.
In September 2012, then immigration minister Labor's Chris Bowen permitted the man to make a valid application for a permanent protection visa.
According to the court documents, he made the application, which was then refused by a delegate of the minister. The plaintiff sought a review of that decision by the Refugee Review Tribunal.
It was here that the man was found to be a refugee by the tribunal. But Mr Bowen did not decide on the case, the documents say.
It was not until June 2014 that the High Court found the minister, now the Coalition's Mr Morrison, should "consider and determine" the man's application for a permanent protection visa according to law.
But Mr Morrison refused, saying it was in the national interest that the man did not receive a visa.
He has also announced that his decision to deny visas in "the national interest" cannot be reviewed by the tribunal.
Current Immigration Minister Peter Dutton has been contacted for comment.