Diary of our stinking Govt.

As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed.  The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.Woman Happy

 

This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.

 

and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598

 

Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says

 

The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.

 

Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).

But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.

 

"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.

 

Message 1 of 17,615
Latest reply
17,614 REPLIES 17,614

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

    

 

       ree.jpg

 

IMO this is unstoppable now, only a matter of time.

Message 9621 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

Smiley Very Happy

Message 9622 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/seven-ministers-put-tony-abbott-on-notice-2015...

 

 

Seven ministers who voted for Tony Abbott in the failed spill motion are now prepared to help remove the Prime Minister if he cannot revive the government's fortunes and recover his position in the polls.

 

The ministers have discussed the timing of any potential move on the Prime Minister, and favour waiting until June – after next month's NSW state election and the May budget.

 

Mr Abbott has attempted in the last fortnight to put the spill motion, which failed 61-39, behind him by shifting the government's focus to national security, childcare and the budget.

 

But he has been hit by a damaging series of leaks and, behind the scenes, discussions are now under way in the ministry about how much time the party should give him to turn the situation around.

Message 9623 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

Seven ministers put Tony Abbott on notice

February 24, 2015 
2682 reading now

 

 

Seven ministers who voted for Tony Abbott in the failed spill motion are now prepared to help remove the Prime Minister if he cannot revive the government's fortunes and recover his position in the polls.

 

The ministers have discussed the timing of any potential move on the Prime Minister, and favour waiting until June – after next month's NSW state election and the May budget.

 

Mr Abbott has attempted in the last fortnight to put the spill motion, which failed 61-39, behind him by shifting the government's focus to national security, childcare and the budget.

 

But he has been hit by a damaging series of leaks and, behind the scenes, discussions are now under way in the ministry about how much time the party should give him to turn the situation around.

 

A series of blunders by Mr Abbott have not helped his cause, with the axing of chief government whip Philip Ruddock, confusion over the tender for the next generation submarine and a suggestion Indonesia should "reciprocate" aid that flowed after the 2004 tsunami by sparing the lives of the two Australians on death row in Bali all contributing to another drop in support in the Liberal party room.

 

Fairfax Media spoke to 11 of the 35 Liberal MPs serving in cabinet, the outer ministry and as parliamentary secretaries on Monday.

Those discussions revealed that seven ministers, who agreed to speak to Fairfax on the basis that they not be named, are now "keeping a watching brief" on the leadership, with some volunteering they would not vote for the prime minister again in the event of another spill.

 

Those seven are in addition to the handful of ministers who voted against Mr Abbott and for a spill two weeks ago.

All seven either publicly or privately expressed support for Mr Abbott in the lead-up to the spill and some are still among Mr Abbott's vocal public supporters.

 

Privately, however, they now concede the government's woes have deepened and admit a collective view has formed that, ultimately, Mr Abbott will have to be removed to revive the government's fortunes.

 

None is advocating a move on Mr Abbott before the NSW state election, due next month, or before the May budget and instead are arguing to agitated backbenchers for the prime minister to be given more time.

 

Several ministers have now reached out to Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull to counsel caution and patience and to point out, as one minister put it, "if it's going to happen, it has to be overwhelming".

 

One minister said: "I don't think it is recoverable but I'm still of the view that he gets until the end of June unless there is a major stuff-up. I couldn't stick with him [Abbott] but we need to manage this."

 

"There's not overwhelming support yet for Malcolm [Turnbull] and it needs to be," the minister said.

 

A cabinet minister stressed his support for the prime minister and said he would not put a timeline on things but "if we come to a point where it is obvious that we can't make it and that things are deteriorating further - the last thing Australia needs is a return to Labor".

A third minister said the view of a core group of ministers "committed to keeping the Coalition in government" had hardened and a move on Mr Abbott would happen because "we don't want the farce of Labor".

 

A fourth said: "The time will have to come to make the change. It's unfair and unfortunate but at some stage we have to consider the best interests of the country and the party will be served by being able to prosecute a positive vision for the future."

 

A fifth minister said MPs were unhappy, they had not seen evidence of change and that "you would have thought the spill bought him a budget but it's not certain".

 

Two backbench MPs who supported the spill said that while the first challenge had come from backbenchers who were now largely silent, disquiet had now moved to the ministry.

 

"This has moved above my pay grade," one said.

 

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/seven-ministers-put-tony-abbott-on-n...

 

Message 9624 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

snap Am  Woman LOL

Message 9625 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

Woman LOL

 

It was a good one. There are some points in that article that those in denial should pay close attention too!

Message 9626 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

A PM on high alert: count the flags

 

Tony Abbott's new emergency alert system is much clearer than the low, medium, high and extreme system employed by the national security apparatus.

 

You need simply count the flags.

 

The Prime Minister had six Australian flags all in a row behind him as he delivered his national security statement on Monday. It was a personal record. His level of alert in this new dark age was off the scale.

 

National statements by prime ministers are by convention delivered from the floor of parliament house.

 

These are not conventional times for this prime minister. He'd had a near-death experience up there on Capital Hill.

 

And so he chose more secure surrounds: a theatre at the Australian Federal Police headquarters down the hill. Quite a stage. The podium boasted a large and reassuring police shield shining in the TV lights.

 

There was no one to take the spotlight from the national leader. No Bill Shorten or members of his opposition, none of the 39 traitors from Mr Abbott's own ranks, no Malcolm Turnbull.

 

Those looking on were serious types from the security acronyms: ASIO, ASIS, ADF, AFP. As for the band of journalists perched on bleachers down the back: they had their instructions. No questions.

 

This proved sensible. The Prime Minister's people had leaked virtually every line from the statement over previous days, creating headlines that built great expectations. Would the Prime Minister elucidate a new Australia where the liberties of the pre-dark age would be dismantled? Would some group of loudmouths be banned?

 

 

image.jpg

 

Read more

 

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/a-pm-on-high-alert-count-the-flag...

 

Message 9627 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/a-pm-on-high-alert-count-the-flags-20150...

 

here's an article on flags Smiley Very Happy

 

Tony Abbott's new emergency alert system is much clearer than the low, medium, high and extreme system employed by the national security apparatus.

 

You need simply count the flags.

 

The Prime Minister had six Australian flags all in a row behind him as he delivered his national security statement on Monday. It was a personal record. His level of alert in this new dark age was off the scale.

 

National statements by prime ministers are by convention delivered from the floor of parliament house.
Advertisement

These are not conventional times for this prime minister. He'd had a near-death experience up there on Capital Hill.

And so he chose more secure surrounds: a theatre at the Australian Federal Police headquarters down the hill. Quite a stage. The podium boasted a large and reassuring police shield shining in the TV lights.

Message 9628 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

LOL we are thinking as one this morning Am

Message 9629 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

 

Thanks for proving Glee wrong by posting that article.

 

As shown, more than just journos chatting about the flags before the speech.

 

 

Message 9630 of 17,615
Latest reply