on โ20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
on โ15-05-2015 03:32 PM
Chuckle!
Indeed it is actually really quite difficult to get any original comments from some regarding the news of the day. Lots of C&Ps of others comments, but a dearth of originality!
H
haha! Not from you obviously!
โ15-05-2015 03:48 PM - edited โ15-05-2015 03:50 PM
" Chuckle!
Indeed it is actually really quite difficult to get any original comments from some regarding the news of the day. Lots of C&Ps of others comments, but a dearth of originality!
haha! Not from you obviously!
Oh I am crushed. However, I do appreciate the efforts to post without the safety net of a C&P. Practice will help a lot over time.
on โ15-05-2015 03:57 PM
@debra9275 wrote:
I just find it hilarious that a couple of those doing all the name calling have done the same ๐
Shows what numpties they are.
โ15-05-2015 04:00 PM - edited โ15-05-2015 04:00 PM
My thoughts exactly
Budget bites: The Law of Unintended Consequences hits Happy Joe
on โ15-05-2015 04:02 PM
Another one...
The coalition's amazing ability to shoot itself in the foot over what is fundamentally reasonable policy is on display again. Last year it was Unhappy Joe's "poor people don't drive" line.
This time it's accusing new mothers of "double dipping" on parental leave. All they had to do was calmly say the minimalist (Labor) parental scheme had to be a safety net for those otherwise receiving nothing from employers.
That's what government social welfare is meant to be โ a safety net. And to think the government has battalions of spin doctors and ministerial advisersโฆ
on โ15-05-2015 04:04 PM
A special mention for my pick as perhaps the most inane comment in the budget papers starts the summary of the Northern Australia infrastructure subsidy: "A strong north means a strong nation."
Well that makes it easy โ just pour all our budget into the Top End and forget the rest of the country as it will be strong if the north is.
Michael Pascoe
BusinessDay contributing editor
โ15-05-2015 04:20 PM - edited โ15-05-2015 04:21 PM
@monman12 wrote:Oh, and I forgot Wyatt Roy's involvement.... You really should do your research and see Where Ashby "appeared" from. MM 12. . I wonder if just anyone without any prior experience could get a job as a staffer.
Perhaps C&Ps do have a certain logical attraction!
Wonder not and do some research! As for Roy, what involvement of import would that be D9275? (exclude hearsay)
What on earth does "Where Ashby "appeared" from. MM 12" have to do with the start of this "guilt by association " that you appear to promote?
The whole matter "blew up" because Ashby went to the Federal Police, all the twitterings apropos early alleged associations have nothing to do with the post complaint investigations.
"Hasn't Slipper been cleared?" NO!
Jul 2014
"Former federal parliamentary speaker Peter Slipper has been found guilty in the ACT Magistrates Court on three counts of dishonesty over the misuse of his parliamentary Cabcharge allowance.
I think you'll find that Slipper has been cleared of all charges.
on โ15-05-2015 04:26 PM
@monman12 wrote:" Chuckle!
Indeed it is actually really quite difficult to get any original comments from some regarding the news of the day. Lots of C&Ps of others comments, but a dearth of originality!
haha! Not from you obviously!
Oh I am crushed. However, I do appreciate the efforts to post without the safety net of a C&P. Practice will help a lot over time.
The chuckle is so appropriate in this post.
The irony of a bunch of over used unoriginal images that have spammed the thread for months to attack other poster for their lack of originality is too funny for words. :D:D:D:D:D:D:D
on โ15-05-2015 04:44 PM
Am
I loved that article, so posting the link again as it sort of got lost amongst all the nonsense
on โ15-05-2015 05:12 PM
Former Speaker Peter Slipper has been cleared of the dishonesty charges that have haunted him for three years.
The ACT Supreme Court on Thursday (26 February 2015) struck out his conviction for using taxpayer-funded taxi vouchers for visits to Canberra region wineries on three occasions in 2010.
The decision means he will no longer have to undertake 300 hours of community service or repay $954 to the Commonwealth imposed on him by an ACT Chief Magistrate Lorraine Walker in September.