Diary of our stinking opposition

Labor frontbencher Andrew Leigh shifts position on previous support for a GP fee

Labor's shadow assistant treasurer Andrew Leigh was once a strong supporter of a compulsory fee for visits to the doctor - a policy now slammed by the opposition as a “GP tax” that would hurt the community’s most vulnerable.

 

But in a 2003 Sydney Morning Herald article Dr Leigh, then a PhD student in economics at Harvard University, argued a Medicare co-payment was “hardly a radical idea”.

 

“As health researchers have shown, cost-less medical care means that people go to the doctor even when they don't need to, driving up the cost for all of us," Dr Leigh and co-author Richard Holden wrote.

 

“But there's a better way of operating a health system, and the change should hardly hurt at all.

 

“As economists have shown, the ideal model involves a small co-payment - not enough to put a dent in your weekly budget, but enough to make you think twice before you call the doc."

 

Dr Leigh argued the fee should be enough to deter “frivolous GP visits”, but not enough to limit genuine preventive care. The fee should apply to everyone, including pensioners, except those who are chronically ill, he wrote.

 

Dr Leigh, who has opposed the proposal in media appearances over recent weeks, told Fairfax Media: "Since 2003, a lot has changed in the health care system, and I've changed my view on co-payments.

 

 “A GP co-payment was originally a Hawke government proposal led by Brian Howe, a member of the Left faction,” he said.

 

“As long as it is applied fairly across the community, a co-payment is a perfectly valid policy measure. If Andrew Leigh, before he had to toe the party line, recognised that then I welcome his contribution to the debate. I respect Andrew Leigh as a sensible economist.”

 

On Saturday, Dr Leigh, a former professor of economics at the Australian National University, distanced himself from an article he wrote in 2004 supporting fee deregulation for universities – another policy opposed by Labor.

 

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/labor-frontbencher-andrew-leigh-shifts-positio...

 

Yes, it’s the very well respected ALP whey-faced Dr Andrew Leigh who virtually declared his previous books and speeches as mere works of fiction. This brings into sharp focus Dr Leigh's economics degree.

Message 1 of 393
Latest reply
392 REPLIES 392

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Well spotted D. But it is the Liberal Party.

 

On the other hand to see the 'enlightened' ALP being driven by a liar is Royal Commission stuff. How did the once mighty ALP fall so far? Will life as we know it go on? Who will step in and end this nightmare. I don't think I can take it for much longer.

Message 231 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Yep, one lie as confessed by shorten up against goodness knows how many from abbott...I can't possibly count them all

In an ideal world no politicians would lie. However, here we are

We've had 3 RC's into labor leaders recently at cost of some $80 million I think, (with little result so far) should we have one on abbott too? Maybe in the next year or so?
Message 232 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Abbott, Bishop take aim at Labor during the Federal Liberal Council

 

DEPUTY Liberal leader Julie Bishop has laid into Labor, saying “the once great movement” had been taken over by political narcissists.

 

Speaking during the Federal Liberal Council this afternoon she said: “The very soul of the Labor Party has been hijacked by a group of backroom bovver boys with no sense of a moral compass and the leader of the pack is none other than Bill Shorten.”

 

“With exposes coming up at the royal commission of his conduct as a union official, I think that the next episode of that popular TV series should be ‘Underbelly Labor’.”

 

Mr Abbott said the ABC’s Killing Season program on the Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard leadership battle had answered what Labor stood for these days.

 

“They’re for themselves,” he said.

 

“Labor has not changed. Almost two years into this term, they still want a carbon tax, they still have no policies to stop the boats, and they’re still addicted to taxes and spending.” Mr Abbott said Mr Shorten could not be trusted.

 

“The one thing Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard could agree on was that you can’t trust Bill Shorten,” he said.

 

“And if two Labor prime ministers couldn’t trust Bill Shorten, why should you?

 

http://www.news.com.au/national/politics/abbott-bishop-take-aim-at-labor-during-the-federal-liberal-...

 

We all want answers. What has happened to the once mighty ALP? Why is it taking orders from the Mafia?

Message 233 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

The opposition may not have achieved the heights of Hawke & Keating but let's wait and see how they go in government next year, shall we?

 

Better to have been "once great" than the never great LibNats (except for Fraser, and he was only great in retirement).

 

http://www.theshovel.com.au/2015/06/25/australia-will-run-out-of-flags-by-2020-at-current-consumptio...

Message 234 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

I think the Australian Labor Party's Accident Squad has been pressed into service. The best advice to give Bill 'the bagman' Shorten is that he shouldn't stand too close to the edge of the road; he might fall under a bus.

 

Bill Shorten Keeping Close Eye On Bill Shorten As Knifing Speculation Mounts

 

Labor leader Bill Shorten is taking no chances with his leadership, today confronting party power broker Bill Shorten about rumours of a potential coup.

 

It is believed the Opposition Leader demanded an assurance from Mr Shorten that he was not organising an uprising against him.

 

Shorten was instrumental in removing both Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard and is again seen as the key figure in any move against the current leader.

 

“If anyone is going to tell the leader that he no longer enjoys the party’s support, then it has to be Bill,” a Labor insider said.

 

The Opposition Leader’s performance has been put under the spotlight recently, amid falling approval ratings and damaging claims about payments that were made under his watch as a union boss.

 

While there is no suggestion Mr Shorten has hit the phones just yet, insiders know that he can mobilise numbers very quickly. “I’d be keeping Shorten on a very tight leash if I was leader. I wouldn’t let him out of my sights,” one MP said.

 

But Mr Shorten denied he was organising a coup, saying his full support was behind the Opposition Leader. “That would make me very, very nervous,” one frontbencher said.

 

http://www.theshovel.com.au/2015/06/19/bill-shorten-keeping-close-eye-on-bill-shorten-as-knifing-spe...

 

 

Message 235 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Mephitic winds continue to waft through ALP H/Qs. Of late janissaries align with Bill 'the bagman' Shorten or The Maltese Pigeon Anthony Albanese as TV viewers are entertained by the latest ALP soap opera.

 

You too can experience Bill Shorten's world of pain

 

On the other hand The ALP makes the Spanish Inquisition look like rank amateurs in thinking up new ways of forcing inmates into contorted, agonising and humiliating positions.

 

Looking for something more daring for your next Canberra trip? Bored of seeing the same old faces at the Portrait Gallery? Can't cope with another visit to Questacon? Have we got the thing for you! Twinned with Amsterdam's famous Museum of Torture, the latest must-see spot on the crowded Canberra tourist circuit is the macabre Museum of Labor, opened last week by avid knife-collector and curator Bill "Switchblade" Shorten.

 

Strictly for the strong of stomach, this unique museum displays some of the most gruesome methods used to torment innocent victims of the Australian public throughout the ages.

 

The Museum layout is a maze of small, dark smoke-filled backrooms accessible only by joining a union, but don't worry, Bill will sign you up for one even if he doesn't tell you about it. Each room houses one or two wax dummies of union officials (not to be mistaken for the actual wax dummies) as well as famous implements of torture which are usually locked behind glass but can brought out for special celebrations such as the National Conference in July. The dark lighting and theatrical design of the museum adds to the scary mood. You never know who'll pop up out of the shadows wielding a bloodstained knife or which direction they'll come at you from!

 

Highlights of the Museum include:

 

The Rack: (Also known as The Kevin Chair). This is a complicated set of medieval rules and regulations based on an arcane algorithm which the Labor Leader is forcefully strapped into, giving him or her a false sense of security, whilst the plotters get on with sharpening their implements behind him in the darkness.

 

Emily's List: A sadistic ritual whereby women of extremely limited talent and ability are placed on a pedestal well above their natural position and forced to stand for parliament. The results are too scary to reproduce here.

 

Scold's Bridle: Particularly popular with female members of the party, most of whom have been drawn from the sinister Emily's List (see above), the Scold's Bridle gives the wearer a sense of virtuous moral superiority as they scold the public about imaginary issues such as misogyny, feminism, looking at your watch and "causing offence".

 

Heretic's Fork: This cruel and unusual punishment was devised specifically to weed out heretics and those who have yet to toe the party line. Local MPs must go into the Q&A torture chamber (see below) and swear that they "believe" in climate change and have "changed their mind" and now passionately support gay marriage.

 

The Mangler: A bizarre form of torture guaranteed to reduce even the most hardened listener to tears within minutes, the Mangler takes perfectly usable words from the English language and mangles them beyond recognition. Make sure Curator Bill gives you his own personal demonstration! We guarantee you'll be "screamink" for mercy long before the final "wiv" and the umpteenth "nuffink".

 

The Brain Fryer: Cunningly used to fry even the most intelligent brain, these meaningless utterances will literally do your head in; such as "I don't know what she said but I agree wiv every word she said" and "Everybody is somebody".

 

Mass dunkings: A vicious trick in which an entire generation were drowned in Labor debt with no escape.

 

The Q&A torture chamber: Your heart will literally be pounding as you enter this scary chamber, which attempts to replicate the Spanish Inquisition of the middle ages. As you take your place at the large round table, keep an eye out for where the real danger lurks – in the audience! Who knows what convicted criminals or terrorism supporters are waiting to pounce!

 

The Julia Cradle: Closely related to impalement, this gruesome punishment entails having the victim sit in his office, after which he is tied down by lies onto a "wedge of false hope" with the intent of stretching the victim's leadership over the shortest period of time, slowly impaling them on their own programmatic specificity and psychopathic dysfunctionality. To add to the overall chaos and ritual humiliation, the victim was usually flown to Copenhagen a few months earlier and stripped of all political and moral credibility. Unfortunately, the device was rarely washed clean, and often re-employed three years later on the person who originally used it!

 

Iron maiden: (Also known as The Pliber Stocks). This torture device consisted of a shadow cabinet with an unhinged front and blood-splattered interior, sufficient enough to enclose at least a dozen undergraduates. Once inside its vice-like grip, the ministers would be unable to move without exposing their hard left, socialist, anti-capitalist, pro-Palestinian leanings and extreme Green sympathies.

 

Papal bull: This unique form of psychological torture was eagerly adopted by the Labor party after they realised with astonishment that the Pope was spouting exactly the same eco-claptrap as they were.

 

http://www.afr.com/opinion/columnists/you-too-can-experience-bill-shortens-world-of-pain-20150626-gh...

Message 236 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

He's back with his latest lie.

 

The Opposition Leader’s claims of being kept in the dark on border security are misleading

 

LABOR’S claim to be in the dark over the government’s asylum seeker turn-back operations has been exposed, with revelations the Opposition has received eight top-secret briefings in the past year.

 

The Daily Telegraph can reveal shadow immigration minister Richard Marles has been briefed on highly sensitive material on at least eight occasions since November 2013 — and as recently as four weeks ago.

 

Labor leader Bill Shorten was also offered a standing invitation as early as February, 2014, to attend highly classified briefings by then-commander of Operation Sovereign Borders General Angus Campbell.

 

However he declined to attend and instead offered to send a junior staff member, an offer which was rejected considering the classified material being presented.

 

The discovery of the secret briefings to Labor — which has been wracked with internal division over whether to adopt the Coalition’s policy — included classified details on turn-back operations, number of people involved and sensitive information on methods employed.

 

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/the-opposition-leaders-claims-of-being-kept-in-the-dark-on...

 

The early onset of senescence perhaps?

Message 237 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Telegraph article is paywalled.

 

I thought the Opposition's main complaint was that the public were, and still are, being kept in the dark.

Message 238 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition


@crosbystills wrote:

Telegraph article is paywalled.

 

I thought the Opposition's main complaint was that the public were, and still are, being kept in the dark.


If it's all so top secret why does the Tele have the "facts"?

Message 239 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

ABC The Killing Season: Julia Gillard was warned not to promote ‘untrustworthy’ Bill Shorten into ministry

 

JULIA Gillard was warned not to promote Bill Shorten into the ministry because he was untrustworthy and would “knock her off”, according to key Labor powerbroker Mark Arbib.

 

Mr Shorten, who was instrumental in the 2010 coup against Kevin Rudd, missed out on a significant promotion immediately following Ms Gillard’s ascension to the Prime Ministership despite his key role in the challenge.

 

And in explosive revelations in tonight’s The Killing Seasonon the ABC, it can now be revealed that Ms Gillard was told by Mr Arbib — then a NSW Senator — not to promote the now Opposition Leader because he would use the union movement to try and overthrow her.

 

http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/abc-the-killing-season-julia-gillard-was-warned-not-to-promo...

 

Ms Gillard should have paid more attention to her horoscope. I think at the time the advice given to her via her horoscope was something like..........."do not trust anyone with the name of William or Bill or anyone with the initials WS." What is the point of the newspapers printing horoscopes if no one heeds the advice contained therein?

Message 240 of 393
Latest reply