63BvfpBL,TdNGTQg~~_7.JPG "ca04"){kind=avatar}
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@izabsmiling wrote:perhaps those who have a high iq and need to advertise that fact for some reason have some other deficit/s ?
If self-aggrandisement was an Olympic Sport, there are one or two posters here whose names would be household words.
Its a pity someone here didn't read post #61 instead of demanding the names of tests etc, I thought that solicitors were good at picking up the littlest comment no matter how unimportant it might be but to miss a biggy like that post is really not a good look.
I wish someone would figure out why the smilies won't work for me on these new forums.
@i-once-was-bump wrote:
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@izabsmiling wrote:perhaps those who have a high iq and need to advertise that fact for some reason have some other deficit/s ?
If self-aggrandisement was an Olympic Sport, there are one or two posters here whose names would be household words.
Its a pity someone here didn't read post #61 instead of demanding the names of tests etc, I thought that solicitors were good at picking up the littlest comment no matter how unimportant it might be but to miss a biggy like that post is really not a good look.
I wish someone would figure out why the smilies won't work for me on these new forums.
you really should read what i wrote. and make an attempt at comprehending it, I asked for the names of the test that allowed for a score of over 150ish as all recognized tests have a ceiling of 160 and any score given above that by using those tests is a projection at best and unlikely to be accurate.
The shrinks are even reluctant to confirm or specify anything over 145 for these reasons.
We then worked out that only 10,000 people in Australia have an IQ of that level and you claim to know three of them....
and the only insight you can provide is it was some anonymous test probably taken 20 years ago as an experiment.
or your mother just told you that score to make you feel good.
you made the claim, not me. You were one of only two posters in this entire thread to claim you had an IQ that exceeded levels that the two recognized tests can only guess at and project based on a leagues table of liklihood. In fact you were one of only two posters who felt the need to advertise their IQ level at all.
and no, the s&B is not an Australian Test, it is the internationally recognized standard.
You have miscomprehended what I wrote. Which proves the point of many in this thread the number given by an IQ score really means Jack and is nothing to boast about or be proud of.
@am*3 wrote:Yeah, I was wondering why anyone with a very high IQ would post regularly on CS or any other general run of the mill forum?
I like slumming it. 
