on 06-03-2015 11:19 AM
What is the future of elections if truth in advertising is ignored., any election promise that has to be broken is a death knell for any government these days after the carbon lie.
Should political parties make any promises at all in election mode? and if not, how will we judge what their policies are? if a policy is found to be unworkable or unaffordable in changing circumstances, should the party be then subject to relentless attack until government is unworkable.
The new political landscape we see now is very different to the landscape we saw under Hawke and Howard.
on 06-03-2015 04:04 PM
on 06-03-2015 06:32 PM
Your partisan slip is showing. This topic is not about any particular politial party its about election campaigns and honesty in them And what type of future campaigns will be run.
on 06-03-2015 06:40 PM
@ladydeburg wrote:
The new political landscape we see now is very different to the landscape we saw under Hawke and Howard.
Yes it is.
Sadly the bar has been set very low by this current government.
Not sure if we will ever get over it.
on 06-03-2015 09:56 PM
@ladydeburg wrote:Your partisan slip is showing. This topic is not about any particular politial party its about election campaigns and honesty in them And what type of future campaigns will be run.
I gave you an excellent example of the dishonesty in election campaigns. Would you like another?
on 06-03-2015 10:38 PM
If this is going to turn into another Abbott bashing thread i’ll leave you to it.
on 06-03-2015 10:39 PM
@donnashuggy wrote:
@ladydeburg wrote:Your partisan slip is showing. This topic is not about any particular politial party its about election campaigns and honesty in them And what type of future campaigns will be run.
I gave you an excellent example of the dishonesty in election campaigns. Would you like another?
"partisanship" aside, I think the example you gave is a very interesting one Donna.
It's one thing to involve yourself in basic dishonesty (such as "We will not make cuts to the ABC") but quite another to deliberately mislead by not providing vital information (as is the case with the boats that apparently have stopped coming but we really wouldn't know).
And that is what I mean when I say the bar has now been set very low.
07-03-2015 11:50 AM - edited 07-03-2015 11:52 AM
@vicr3000 wrote:
@am*3 wrote:The pension age for men and women born from 1 July 1952 will be gradually increased from 65 to 67 years as set out in the table below.
Period within which a person was born Pension age Date pension age changes
From 1 July 1952 to 31 December 1953 65 years and 6 months 1 July 2017 From 1 January 1954 to 30 June 1955 66 years 1 July 2019 From 1 July 1955 to 31 December 1956 66 years and 6 months 1 July 2021 From 1 January 1957 onwards 67 years 1 July 2023
https://www.dss.gov.au/our-responsibilities/seniors/benefits-payments/age-pension
Yep, that was the time scale laid out by Labor.
Obviously, which is why I posted it, as ladyb asked what age it was raised to.
Do you know the age Labor raised it to? I think it's 68 but I'm not sure.
on 07-03-2015 05:42 PM
Looks like the PM is going to abandon that policy and stick with the Labor projection of 68 years.
07-03-2015 06:22 PM - edited 07-03-2015 06:23 PM
67 years?
Why do they keep announcing new changes/policies and then back-flip on them?
on 07-03-2015 06:33 PM
I think a question which should be asked is: does the electorate really expect politicians to keep their election promises? Surely by now we've learned that whichever side is making them it is all hot air and weasel words and that afterwards they will insist that black is really white and what they said wasn't really what we thought they meant.