Evolution Fraud and Myths

[lionofjudah60]

http://www.nwcreation.net/evolutionfraud.html

[the_bob_delusion]

---

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

OK then ...

I'll highlight it for you.

Extensive research done on various Australopithecus
specimens by two world-renowned anatomists from England and
the USA, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, showed that
these creatures did not walk upright in human manner. Having studied the
bones of these fossils for a period of 15 years thanks to grants from the
British government, Lord Zuckerman and his team of five specialists
reached the conclusion that australopithecines were only an ordinary ape
genus and were definitely not bipedal.

---

it's the gradual change. Homo erectus walked upright. Well the point is, there're plenty of transitional forms. It gets to a point where some scientist can't decide if they're apes or humans. 

[rabbitearbandicoot]

---

@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:

---

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

OK then ...

I'll highlight it for you.

Extensive research done on various Australopithecus
specimens by two world-renowned anatomists from England and
the USA, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, showed that
these creatures did not walk upright in human manner. Having studied the
bones of these fossils for a period of 15 years thanks to grants from the
British government, Lord Zuckerman and his team of five specialists
reached the conclusion that australopithecines were only an ordinary ape
genus and were definitely not bipedal.

---

it's the gradual change. Homo erectus walked upright. Well the point is, there're plenty of transitional forms. It gets to a point where some scientist can't decide if they're apes or humans. 

---

you mean like : Piltdown man, Nebraska man, Java Man, Orc Man - and who knows how many more - who were composites / fakes.

[evil_akuma_2002]

Pointless debating a misguided theist, Bob.

"There are none so blind as they who refuse to see".

But...it is fascinating to observe how the intoxicating and compelling nature of religion can totally pervade and distort the human thinking processes, isn't it?

[aps1080]

Evil

But...it is fascinating to observe how the intoxicating and compelling nature of religion can totally pervade and

distort the human thinking processes, isn't it?

A very true statement - and I'm not referring to this thread !

[the_bob_delusion]

---

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

---

@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:

---

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

OK then ...

I'll highlight it for you.

Extensive research done on various Australopithecus
specimens by two world-renowned anatomists from England and
the USA, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, showed that
these creatures did not walk upright in human manner. Having studied the
bones of these fossils for a period of 15 years thanks to grants from the
British government, Lord Zuckerman and his team of five specialists
reached the conclusion that australopithecines were only an ordinary ape
genus and were definitely not bipedal.

---

it's the gradual change. Homo erectus walked upright. Well the point is, there're plenty of transitional forms. It gets to a point where some scientist can't decide if they're apes or humans. 

---

you mean like : Piltdown man, Nebraska man, Java Man, Orc Man - and who knows how many more - who were composites / fakes.

---

 I have never heard of those in science books. Where are you getting your sources from???? If your point is there are Frauds out there, then I agree with you. 

[this-one-time-at-bandcamp]

The origin of anthropoids — the simians, or "higher primates," which include monkeys, apes and humans — has been debated for decades among scientists. Although fossils unearthed in Egypt have long suggested that Africa was the cradle for anthropoids, other bones revealed in the last 15 years or so raised the possibility that Asia may be their birthplace.

Interesting reading..........

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/04/primate-fossil-human-ancestors-asia-africa_n_1569225.html

[cartooncomics]

Chimpanzes. A wize American once said it's better to keep your mouth shut & be thought a fool.Rather than open it & be known a fool.

[bobon_bo]

---

@evil_akuma_2002 wrote:

Pointless debating a misguided theist, Bob.

"There are none so blind as they who refuse to see".

But...it is fascinating to observe how the intoxicating and compelling nature of religion can totally pervade and distort the human thinking processes, isn't it?

---

When you were a Minister how much did you fleece from the unsuspecting congregation that thought you were genuine?I have asked 4 times now.Why wont you tell us how much you stole from them?

[bobon_bo]

---

@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:

---

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

---

@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:

---

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

OK then ...

I'll highlight it for you.

Extensive research done on various Australopithecus
specimens by two world-renowned anatomists from England and
the USA, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, showed that
these creatures did not walk upright in human manner. Having studied the
bones of these fossils for a period of 15 years thanks to grants from the
British government, Lord Zuckerman and his team of five specialists
reached the conclusion that australopithecines were only an ordinary ape
genus and were definitely not bipedal.

---

it's the gradual change. Homo erectus walked upright. Well the point is, there're plenty of transitional forms. It gets to a point where some scientist can't decide if they're apes or humans. 

---

you mean like : Piltdown man, Nebraska man, Java Man, Orc Man - and who knows how many more - who were composites / fakes.

---

 I have never heard of those in science books. Where are you getting your sources from???? If your point is there are Frauds out there, then I agree with you. 

---

why do you always run when anyone asks a question you cannot answer.You were going to get the fossil to show a change in kind.You still have not shown one.Secondly you were going to tell me what kept something alive while it was evolving the necessary organs for life.

[rabbitearbandicoot]

This from a scientific site - who clearly is against creationist.

there is little consensus on what our family tree is. Everyone accepts that the robust australopithecines (aethiopicus, robustus and
boisei) are not ancestral to us, being a side branch that left no descendants. Whether H. habilis is descended from A. afarensis, africanus, both of them, or neither of them, is still a matter of debate. It is possible that none of the known australopithecines is our ancestor.