on 26-12-2014 11:04 AM
on 02-01-2015 03:21 PM
@evil_akuma_2002 wrote:
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:I am going out now for an hour, so I'll expect your response when I return.
Awfully demanding and presumptous of you!
Careful, you're beginning to sound like your friend, the pussycat!
Sigh! Would that theists woulfd learn to discuss religious concepts amicably - but...when someone insults/challenges their belief system, it's all-out war!!
No, not presumptious - Bob has never answered any of my questions (as a newboy you wouldn't know) - a little sarcastic perhaps but, trying to get Bob to answer an explicit question like the one above, without his going into a ramble about something else entirely is a bit of a chanllenge.
It is a little impossible to discuss Religion amicably when Evolutionists call me idiot for believing, offer up all sorts of theories but will not discuss why x = y - instead just say 'read a science book'. Well, I accepted their challenge and read "Species" from cover-to-cover, but they still say "read another".
on 02-01-2015 03:25 PM
@twyngwyn wrote:Contradictions in Genesis (order included)
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/gen/contra_list.html
Yeah! Thanks for that. Are you prepared to read all 89 responses to the statements on that site? Other wise there's no point in me spending HOURS to debunk them all.
02-01-2015 03:33 PM - edited 02-01-2015 03:34 PM
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:
@evil_akuma_2002 wrote:
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:I am going out now for an hour, so I'll expect your response when I return.
Awfully demanding and presumptous of you!
Careful, you're beginning to sound like your friend, the pussycat!
Sigh! Would that theists woulfd learn to discuss religious concepts amicably - but...when someone insults/challenges their belief system, it's all-out war!!
No, not presumptious - Bob has never answered any of my questions (as a newboy you wouldn't know) - a little sarcastic perhaps but, trying to get Bob to answer an explicit question like the one above, without his going into a ramble about something else entirely is a bit of a chanllenge.
It is a little impossible to discuss Religion amicably when Evolutionists call me idiot for believing, offer up all sorts of theories but will not discuss why x = y - instead just say 'read a science book'. Well, I accepted their challenge and read "Species" from cover-to-cover, but they still say "read another".
and now, someone supplies a link to a site, which I have discussed at length before, about so called Contradictions in the Bible, and then expect me to spend HOURS debunking each entry - again. I have neither the time nor the inclination to spend those MANY HOURS and then have my responces ignored or at best glossed over.
This is also typical. Someone makes a statement - I take it as a question and put up my response and no more is heard of it. Neither a "I see what you mean" nor a "You are up yourself". IF someone is GENUINELY INTERESTED in my viewpoint then I will spend the time necessary to explain, but, on this site - I have learned my lesson well - ie that there is no-one interested in anything but getting my response and pulling it to bits and making FUN of me/my beliefs.
No, not paranoid - just realistic.
on 02-01-2015 03:37 PM
on 02-01-2015 03:50 PM
@twyngwyn wrote:
I don't expect you to do anything? You asked for a link??
I have read books written by scholars, and they all have trouble with it...because it is written by different authors
No offense meant
Sorry if I misunderstood. I asked for links to read about the various sciences that are used in evolution - not a link (one of many) that seeks to discredit the Bible. I have read many of them and they are all, shall we say, nit-picking at the very best. I have been through the first 36 of those on your list - they are ALL just so much RUBBISH. If you wish I can explain - but one at a time - someone pick one.
on 02-01-2015 04:26 PM
@iapetus_rocks wrote:
@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:I have learnt a lot from these posts. That indoctrination and brainwashing can be so strong that even providing evidence won't change someone's mind.
Bob, it is arguable that those who have been brainwashed and indoctrinated by the purveyors of religion don't have very much mind left to be changed.
They choose belief over knowledge. It's a distinction which is lost on most of them.
Both of these posts are typical of what I am saying - ie anyone that believes is a 'richard cranium' with no inteligence whatsoever and they can't be taught anything by us even though we are super-intelligent and know all the answers. PEACE.
on 02-01-2015 08:47 PM
Hey Bob......
I am still waiting for you to explain what you meant by:
"You do realise the book got that wrong too right with the ordering".
waiting .... waiting ...... waiting .....
on 02-01-2015 09:24 PM
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:Hey Bob......
I am still waiting for you to explain what you meant by:
"You do realise the book got that wrong too right with the ordering".
waiting .... waiting ...... waiting .....
Are you saying that genesis got the order of creation correct. BTW even Genesis 1 doesn't agree with Genesis 2.
on 02-01-2015 09:27 PM
@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:Hey Bob......
I am still waiting for you to explain what you meant by:
"You do realise the book got that wrong too right with the ordering".
waiting .... waiting ...... waiting .....
Are you saying that genesis got the order of creation correct. BTW even Genesis 1 doesn't agree with Genesis 2.
I'm asking you to point out to me where the order is wrong?
on 02-01-2015 09:34 PM
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:
@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:
@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:Hey Bob......
I am still waiting for you to explain what you meant by:
"You do realise the book got that wrong too right with the ordering".
waiting .... waiting ...... waiting .....
Are you saying that genesis got the order of creation correct. BTW even Genesis 1 doesn't agree with Genesis 2.
I'm asking you to point out to me where the order is wrong?
What's the point if you're not willing to accept that the bible could be wrong? Name one advancement in science because of the bible?