Evolution Fraud and Myths

156 REPLIES 156

Re: Evolution Fraud and Myths


@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

Hey Bob......

 

I am still waiting for you to explain what you meant by:

 

    "You do realise the book got that wrong too right with the ordering".

 

 

waiting .... waiting ...... waiting .....

 

 

 


Are you saying that genesis got the order of creation correct. BTW even Genesis 1 doesn't agree with Genesis 2.


I'm asking you to point out to me where the order is wrong?


What's the point if you're not willing to accept that the bible could be wrong? Name one advancement in science because of the bible?


Now, that's typical of you Bob. You state something and when questioned about it, you refuse to answer but throw in another red herring. You show me where the bible has things out of order - you said it! Now back it up.

Message 141 of 157
Latest reply

Re: Evolution Fraud and Myths

Rabbit, the bible clearly states that...

 

God created light on the first day, yet didn't create the sun until the fourth day - where did the light come from?

Also, he separated the light from the dark on the first day - so, did he have a light switch?

 

Plants were created on the 3rd day - yet there was no sun to drive their photosynthesis.

 

God made two lights - the sun and the moon - but not until the 4th day, and as we all know, the moon merely reflects light, and is not a source of it.

 

God says..."I have given you every herb ... and every tree ... for meat."

What - even the poisonous ones?

 

The flood...

Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the dove returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes out again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn't germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period!

When the animals left the ark, what would they have eaten? There would have been no plants after the ground had been submerged for nearly a year. What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would have gone extinct.

 

That's just a few - but here's a link to a good site with more anomalies and incorrect info.

 

http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/science/long.html

 

 And please - don't use the trite old answer that 'as he's god, he can do anything!' rhetoric - it merely suggets that the person using it is wilfully too ignorant to accept any more plausible explanation. It's akin to putting one's head in the sand.

Message 142 of 157
Latest reply

Re: Evolution Fraud and Myths


@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

Hey Bob......

 

I am still waiting for you to explain what you meant by:

 

    "You do realise the book got that wrong too right with the ordering".

 

 

waiting .... waiting ...... waiting .....

 

 

 


Are you saying that genesis got the order of creation correct. BTW even Genesis 1 doesn't agree with Genesis 2.


I'm asking you to point out to me where the order is wrong?


What's the point if you're not willing to accept that the bible could be wrong? Name one advancement in science because of the bible?


Now, that's typical of you Bob. You state something and when questioned about it, you refuse to answer but throw in another red herring. You show me where the bible has things out of order - you said it! Now back it up.


 

I'm sorry, but this is kinda pointless because it's just too easy. I like a challenge. 

Message 143 of 157
Latest reply

Re: Evolution Fraud and Myths

You are a bit slow there 'evil' - that link was posted way back in this thread - cut-and-paste is a wonderful thing isn't it?

 

As I said above, I will answer any of those points, one at a time, when asked by someone who is interested in knowing the truth, and that is obviously not you - you already know it all.

 

OK Bob, that should make it easier for you - now remember one point at a time - You have to make allowances for me after all I am not as intelligent as you all.

 

Message 144 of 157
Latest reply

Re: Evolution Fraud and Myths

Bob wrote:"I'm sorry, but this is kinda pointless because it's just too easy. I like a challenge. "

 

 

Yes, but you have to remember, I'm not as smart as you, I'm just a dumb-ass mushroom who is not as evolved as you intelligent people - so take it easy on me will you - I might crack under the pressure and start believing in abiogenesis.

Message 145 of 157
Latest reply

Re: Evolution Fraud and Myths


@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

You are a bit slow there 'evil' - that link was posted way back in this thread - cut-and-paste is a wonderful thing isn't it?

 

As I said above, I will answer any of those points, one at a time, when asked by someone who is interested in knowing the truth, and that is obviously not you - you already know it all.

 

OK Bob, that should make it easier for you - now remember one point at a time - You have to make allowances for me after all I am not as intelligent as you all.

 


Slow?  No, not at all. Merely stepping in as Bob seemed not to want to.

In a public forum, it's open to all to respond, so I did.

BTW, I noticed that you carefully skirted all the issues and anomalies I put forwards!

 

So, is it that you only want Bob's answers, or have you realised that indeed, Genesis was incorrect?

Message 146 of 157
Latest reply

Re: Evolution Fraud and Myths


@evil_akuma_2002 wrote:

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

You are a bit slow there 'evil' - that link was posted way back in this thread - cut-and-paste is a wonderful thing isn't it?

 

As I said above, I will answer any of those points, one at a time, when asked by someone who is interested in knowing the truth, and that is obviously not you - you already know it all.

 

OK Bob, that should make it easier for you - now remember one point at a time - You have to make allowances for me after all I am not as intelligent as you all.

 


Slow?  No, not at all. Merely stepping in as Bob seemed not to want to.

In a public forum, it's open to all to respond, so I did.

BTW, I noticed that you carefully skirted all the issues and anomalies I put forwards!

 

So, is it that you only want Bob's answers, or have you realised that indeed, Genesis was incorrect?


I feel specialCat Very Happy

Message 147 of 157
Latest reply

Re: Evolution Fraud and Myths

I had decided to not answer questions from anyone but Bob, but I'll make an exception. I also said 'one at a time' , so that is what I'll do - even though you will make something entirely different of my response.

 

 

God says..."I have given you every herb ... and every tree ... for meat." What - even the poisonous ones?

 

Since many plants have evolved poisons to protect against animals that would like to eat them, God's advice is more than a little reckless.


Would you tell your children to go out in the garden and eat whatever plants they encounter? Of course not.

 

 

Let's just break down what God actually gave them to eat, shall we?

 

Let's use the whole scripture shall we and not just the bit that suits you and your agenda.

 

The scripture actually says:

"29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat."

 

So, what did God say was good to eat?

1.It was ONLY:

    a). the "herbs bearing seed"
    b). the trees which have "fruit bearing seeds'
    c). and more to the point  the plants that were current on the earth at the time. I have been told many times on here, most of plants that existed in those times are now extinct or have evolved into something else - you in fact say exactly that yourself.


Now, let's deal with your second point in which you said : "Since many plants have evolved poisons to protect ....".

 

You can't have it both ways - either they were created poisonous or they evolved poisons - which is it?.

 

- since you say 'have evolved poisons' it is clear that originally they weren't posionous.

 

So, maybe God wasn't so reckless after all.

 

 

Now, when I feel like casting a few more pearls before swine, I MIGHT respond to another one of those points. They are all as ridculous as each other. 

Message 148 of 157
Latest reply

Re: Evolution Fraud and Myths

The evolution revolution is causing pollution in my solution.

 

That's my ablution for the day.

Message 149 of 157
Latest reply

Re: Evolution Fraud and Myths


@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

I had decided to not answer questions from anyone but Bob, but I'll make an exception. I also said 'one at a time' , so that is what I'll do - even though you will make something entirely different of my response.

 

 

God says..."I have given you every herb ... and every tree ... for meat." What - even the poisonous ones?

 

Since many plants have evolved poisons to protect against animals that would like to eat them, God's advice is more than a little reckless.


Would you tell your children to go out in the garden and eat whatever plants they encounter? Of course not.

 

 

Let's just break down what God actually gave them to eat, shall we?

 

Let's use the whole scripture shall we and not just the bit that suits you and your agenda.

 

The scripture actually says:

"29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat."

 

So, what did God say was good to eat?

1.It was ONLY:

    a). the "herbs bearing seed"
    b). the trees which have "fruit bearing seeds'
    c). and more to the point  the plants that were current on the earth at the time. I have been told many times on here, most of plants that existed in those times are now extinct or have evolved into something else - you in fact say exactly that yourself.


Now, let's deal with your second point in which you said : "Since many plants have evolved poisons to protect ....".

 

You can't have it both ways - either they were created poisonous or they evolved poisons - which is it?.

 

- since you say 'have evolved poisons' it is clear that originally they weren't posionous.

 

So, maybe God wasn't so reckless after all.

 

 

Now, when I feel like casting a few more pearls before swine, I MIGHT respond to another one of those points. They are all as ridculous as each other. 


Oh dear - where do I start?

 

I guess we can start with the fact that I never mentioned..."Since many plants have evolved poisons to protect against animals that would like to eat them, God's advice is more than a little reckless."

 

Curious. I've read and re-read my post, and cannot find those words anywhere! So is it that you really thought you saw them, or are they only a figment of your imagination?

 

Secondly, if your god made everything, and only suggested eating...

.a). the "herbs bearing seed"
 b). the trees which have "fruit bearing seeds'

 

Are you aware that at least 99% of ALL plants bear seeds and/or fruit? That also includes the poisonous ones! And still others have friuts which are both edible AND poisonous!

 

So, why would your god either make poisonous plants, (many very similar in appearence to perfectly safe plants), or indeed, allow poisonous plants to evolve? Seems to defeat his original intentions, doesn't it? Making all vegetation edible by humans?

 

But - if you take natural selection into account, it becomes a far more plausible solution, in that plants have developed, over time, a defense mechanism to protect themselves from eradictaion by ingestion. In the same way that many animal and insect species have developed poisons or foul smells to ward off potential predators.

 

Ah, but then again, no - it's god's form of latter-day population control, isn't it? He knew that when he decreed that we should 'go forth and multiply, we'd actually breed like rabbits, so engineered a way of curbing the population! He either didn't warn of the inherent poisons, or planned for them to develop at a later date.

Smart man, your god!

 

And please - feel free to cast some more 'Pearls before this Swine' - I'm more than happy to tear holes in theistic theories.

 

Message 150 of 157
Latest reply