Evolution - Yes again.

Can someone please read this information, and Yes, it's a creationist site, but it explains the  life-from-nothing / evolution theory and how it is flawed..

 

I understand most of what he is saying, and the arguments seem very logical to me, but, I have no way of knowing whether the Science he is quoting is correct or has subsequently been debunked.

 

I would appreciate if someone with a bit more knowledge in DNA / RNA / proteins / cell regeneration / cell division etc could advise me.

 

By the way, he also quotes Dawkin's Ancestor's Tale and how, with recent developments at least some of the assumptions that Dawkins makes are impossible.

 

Can we PLEASE see if we can keep this thread civil and on-topic.

 

There is a lot more info on this site too, but first can we look at and discuss:

 

http://creation.com/genetic-code-intelligence

 

http://creation.com/meta-information

 

 

Message 1 of 132
Latest reply
131 REPLIES 131

Evolution - Yes again.

what did I miss?

Message 111 of 132
Latest reply

Evolution - Yes again.

What happened in here? So many posts gone.

 

Message 112 of 132
Latest reply

Evolution - Yes again.


@secondhand-wonderland wrote:

What happened in here? So many posts gone.

 


Yes, it's almost as if a whole day is gone? I particularly liked the post you put up - thankfully I took a copy before it went.

 

Perhaps someone should ask the mods?

Message 113 of 132
Latest reply

Evolution - Yes again.


@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

@secondhand-wonderland wrote:

What happened in here? So many posts gone.

 


Yes, it's almost as if a whole day is gone? I particularly liked the post you put up - thankfully I took a copy before it went.

 

Perhaps someone should ask the mods?


Thanks 🙂  I didn't think there was anything offensive about any of those posts.  Interpersonal? Maybe a little. But not in any malicious way I didn't think. 

 

How can it not be interpersonal when we are talking about individual beliefs? It's annoying how certain posts are seen to be not appropriate yet others stay... It would be nice if the moderators left a bit of an explanation when they cut threads down like that. 

 

 

 

 

Message 114 of 132
Latest reply

Evolution - Yes again.


@curmu-curmu wrote:

@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:



OK. Pick one. Let's take your favourite if you like 'human embryos".


I'm good with that. But before any debate takes place, you'll need to research the facts prior. Googling 'human embryo gills' will take you to a myriad of sites - and curiously, the ONLY ones that discount the theory, are the religious sites. A classic example of distorting the facts to suit an agenda.

Anyway, here's just a couple worth looking into...

 

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evodevo_02

 

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2012/06/14/are-the-gill-slits-of-vertebrate-embryos-a-hoax/

 

and to add balance...

 

https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-against-evolution/something-fishy-about-gill-slits/

 

I await your investigations...


"Googling 'human embryo gills' will take you to a myriad of sites - and curiously, the ONLY ones that discount favour the theory, are the religious evolutionist sites. A classic example of distorting the facts to suit an agenda.

Message 115 of 132
Latest reply

Evolution - Yes again.


@curmu-curmu wrote:

True! 

And interesting to note that many other animals also bear lanugo - whales, primates, seals and elephants, to name a few. Yet to some, they're not at all related to humans - despite so much contrary evidence.


and many other animals have two ears,  a nose and a mouth - are they all related to humans too?

Message 116 of 132
Latest reply

Evolution - Yes again.


@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

@curmu-curmu wrote:

True! 

And interesting to note that many other animals also bear lanugo - whales, primates, seals and elephants, to name a few. Yet to some, they're not at all related to humans - despite so much contrary evidence.


and many other animals have two ears,  a nose and a mouth - are they all related to humans too?


If they are mammals then my understanding is yes, they are.

Message 117 of 132
Latest reply

Evolution - Yes again.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolutionary_genetics

Humans,chimps and bonobos share aroumd 98%-99% of DNA.TO see a 100% match please refer to the Reclaim Australia thread
Message 118 of 132
Latest reply

Evolution - Yes again.


@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolutionary_genetics

Humans,chimps and bonobos share aroumd 98%-99% of DNA.TO see a 100% match please refer to the Reclaim Australia thread

how much difference is there between Neanderthal and Homo sapien?

Message 119 of 132
Latest reply

Evolution - Yes again.

Apparently we share about 97.5 %

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_genome_project

 

There is also growing evidence that modern humans may have interbred with Neanderthals

 

http://www.sci-news.com/othersciences/anthropology/science-neanderthal-genes-modern-human-dna-01734....

Message 120 of 132
Latest reply