on 21-02-2016 07:42 AM
Asylum seeker baby Asha's advocate says she has been banned from seeing Asha's mother by immigration police, as fears mount she is about to be taken away.
Twelve-month-old Asha was taken to Lady Cilento Children's Hospital in Brisbane suffering burns she received from boiling water while in detention on Nauru.
Although she has recovered, doctors and nurses at the hospital are refusing to discharge Asha unless she is provided with a safe home.
Former Nauru detention centre caseworker and family advocate Natasha Blucher says when she spoke to the baby's mum on Saturday morning, something was wrong.
'I called mum at 9am, and she told me that about 7am, some immigration officers had come to her room and told her she was leaving,' Ms Blucher told AAP on Saturday.
She said Asha's mother was told she would need to leave with plain-clothes officers waiting for her downstairs and that she needed to go quietly.
'When asked, 'where are you taking me', they declined to tell her, and said it was neither the community, Nauru or a detention centre,' Ms Blucher said.
But at 8am, a doctor came in and told Asha's mum that she was safe, as he would not be
discharging her unless he was satisfied a safe home was waiting for Asha.
That was the last Ms Blucher heard from the mother.
When she called at 3.15pm, she says she was told by immigration officers that Asha's mum could no longer make or receive calls.
'The Serco officers said they had been informed by border police that she was not allowed any calls - not even from her lawyers,' Ms Blucher told AAP.
'To hold someone incommunicado like that to me says you're about to do something that's not in their interest,' she said.
Refugee advocates have since surrounded the hospital in hope of blocking any officers who attempt to take Asha away.
GetUp Queensland spokeswoman Ellen Roberts said about 200 protesters were outside the hospital, and would maintain a 24-hour presence until they received confirmation about the family's plight.
Hmmm...sinister moves afoot?
on 23-02-2016 06:42 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:Is it just coincidence, I wonder, that no official accusation of deliberate injury was made until after the campaign to prevent her being sent back became headline news (insert cynical smiley here)
______________________________________________________
An official accusation must have been made for the matter to be dealt with by legal and health authorities.
"No comments while the matter is under police investigation" is often quoted.
DEB
on 23-02-2016 06:58 PM
Asylum seeker advocates have released a letter :
The legality of the possession of this letter and for the medical information to be made public, concerns me.
DEB
on 23-02-2016 08:22 PM
@lloydslights wrote:Asylum seeker advocates have released a letter :
The legality of the possession of this letter and for the medical information to be made public, concerns me.
DEB
Why? If the accusation can be made public then why not the contrary information? Also, is it not possible that a copy of the letter was given to advocates by the mother? If she has been accused, would she, or her lawyers, not be enttled to a copy?
on 23-02-2016 08:44 PM
@lloydslights wrote:
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:Is it just coincidence, I wonder, that no official accusation of deliberate injury was made until after the campaign to prevent her being sent back became headline news (insert cynical smiley here)
______________________________________________________An official accusation must have been made for the matter to be dealt with by legal and health authorities."No comments while the matter is under police investigation" is often quoted.DEBThe matter isn't under investigation though.. According to Qld. Police, she was cleared. The "official accusation " apparently came from a security guard. Perhaps he reported her for something as simple as hearing her say "it's all my fault" because she left the hot water sittiing on a table
on 23-02-2016 08:57 PM
Suggestion the Nepalese woman harmed her child on purpose in order to gain entry to Australia appears to have come from comments by Peter Dutton
Allegations baby Asha was deliberately harmed by her mother as a way to get the family off Nauru and into Australia have been refuted by medical records and dismissed by police and advocates.
The suggestion that the Nepalese woman deliberately harmed her one-year-old child appeared to have grown from comments made by the immigration minister, Peter Dutton, in parliament, a subsequent attempt by crossbenchers to censure him and media reports on Tuesday of a police investigation.
The Queensland police investigation, sparked by a child protection notification reportedly from a guard, has since been closed and no charges have been laid.
23-02-2016 09:09 PM - edited 23-02-2016 09:11 PM
@debra9275 wrote:
@lloydslights wrote:
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:Is it just coincidence, I wonder, that no official accusation of deliberate injury was made until after the campaign to prevent her being sent back became headline news (insert cynical smiley here)
______________________________________________________An official accusation must have been made for the matter to be dealt with by legal and health authorities."No comments while the matter is under police investigation" is often quoted.DEBThe matter isn't under investigation though.. According to Qld. Police, she was cleared. The "official accusation " apparently came from a security guard. Perhaps he reported her for something as simple as hearing her say "it's all my fault" because she left the hot water sittiing on a table
Edited: In response to the quoted post.
It would be his job/obligation to officially report what he heard.
His report had to be investigated.
Just as in any workplace, school, church, hospital, etc. an Incident Report should be handed to Authorities .
Society in general expects this to be compulsory (especially when children are involved).
DEB