on 21-02-2016 07:42 AM
Asylum seeker baby Asha's advocate says she has been banned from seeing Asha's mother by immigration police, as fears mount she is about to be taken away.
Twelve-month-old Asha was taken to Lady Cilento Children's Hospital in Brisbane suffering burns she received from boiling water while in detention on Nauru.
Although she has recovered, doctors and nurses at the hospital are refusing to discharge Asha unless she is provided with a safe home.
Former Nauru detention centre caseworker and family advocate Natasha Blucher says when she spoke to the baby's mum on Saturday morning, something was wrong.
'I called mum at 9am, and she told me that about 7am, some immigration officers had come to her room and told her she was leaving,' Ms Blucher told AAP on Saturday.
She said Asha's mother was told she would need to leave with plain-clothes officers waiting for her downstairs and that she needed to go quietly.
'When asked, 'where are you taking me', they declined to tell her, and said it was neither the community, Nauru or a detention centre,' Ms Blucher said.
But at 8am, a doctor came in and told Asha's mum that she was safe, as he would not be
discharging her unless he was satisfied a safe home was waiting for Asha.
That was the last Ms Blucher heard from the mother.
When she called at 3.15pm, she says she was told by immigration officers that Asha's mum could no longer make or receive calls.
'The Serco officers said they had been informed by border police that she was not allowed any calls - not even from her lawyers,' Ms Blucher told AAP.
'To hold someone incommunicado like that to me says you're about to do something that's not in their interest,' she said.
Refugee advocates have since surrounded the hospital in hope of blocking any officers who attempt to take Asha away.
GetUp Queensland spokeswoman Ellen Roberts said about 200 protesters were outside the hospital, and would maintain a 24-hour presence until they received confirmation about the family's plight.
Hmmm...sinister moves afoot?
on 21-02-2016 01:48 PM
so are we making an example of these people??
"these people"?
either way, if they are allowed
to stay or not, it will send a message
so yes. you could say that.
btw abbott is no longer PM/spokesman
i knew that. thanks.
are we not discussing the same
deal here?
you said you didn't "get it".
the article explained the reasons
for backing away from the deal.
on 21-02-2016 01:53 PM
from your article julia ( and in the order it was printed)
thank you. i included the link so you
could read the whole article if you wished
and selected the content that was
relevant to your question. you're welcome.
on 21-02-2016 01:55 PM
not sure that it's worth costing us 1.2 billion a year though to keep those 150 people in the detention centre indefinitely
on 21-02-2016 01:57 PM
I just reposted it in context with the prior sentences in the article Julia. no problem, thanks
on 21-02-2016 02:12 PM
@debra9275 wrote:not sure that it's worth costing us 1.2 billion a year though to keep those 150 people in the detention centre indefinitely
that does seem ridiculous.
but are you sure the figures are correct?
as of 2014:
The federal government has spent more than $1 billion this financial year to house about 2200 asylum seekers in offshore detention centres in Papua New Guinea and Nauru.
on 21-02-2016 02:17 PM
@debra9275 wrote:it sounds like they live in a tent Erica
IF A five-month-old girl was being kept in a leaky tent surrounded by rats anywhere in Australia, she would be taken into government care. But this isgovernment care, albeit 4500km from the mainland.
Asha, whose pixelated face appeared on placards at snap rallies in Melbourne and Sydney this week, sleeps on a wet mattress. Her tent leaks “constantly”, according to her family’s lawyers.
She has trouble feeding and there and mosquitos everywhere, but Asha’s mum refuses to use the government-supplied mosquito net. It’s sprayed with chemicals, she says.
There’s no running water, there’s the constant threat of communicable disease and there are security guards watching over them 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It’s suicide watch for asylum seekers
that article is from last year-
nowhere have I read any report that the mother harmed her child on purpose either btw - but then again I don't read Bolt
did Bolt say the child was deliberately harmed?
on 21-02-2016 02:17 PM
@debra9275 wrote:not sure that it's worth costing us 1.2 billion a year though to keep those 150 people in the detention centre indefinitely
Who'd have thought it would cost so much to make a few people miserable.
on 21-02-2016 02:19 PM
yes, sorry I got that wrong- it's the cost of Manus, Nauru & Christmas island
most recent article I could find is this one
the breakdown is in the article
on 21-02-2016 02:20 PM
on 21-02-2016 02:23 PM
did Bolt say the child was deliberately harmed?
no idea as I said I don't read/watch him