Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed

Asylum seeker baby Asha's advocate says she has been banned from seeing Asha's mother by immigration police, as fears mount she is about to be taken away.

 

Twelve-month-old Asha was taken to Lady Cilento Children's Hospital in Brisbane suffering burns she received from boiling water while in detention on Nauru.

 

Although she has recovered, doctors and nurses at the hospital are refusing to discharge Asha unless she is provided with a safe home.

 

Former Nauru detention centre caseworker and family advocate Natasha Blucher says when she spoke to the baby's mum on Saturday morning, something was wrong.

 

'I called mum at 9am, and she told me that about 7am, some immigration officers had come to her room and told her she was leaving,' Ms Blucher told AAP on Saturday.

 

She said Asha's mother was told she would need to leave with plain-clothes officers waiting for her downstairs and that she needed to go quietly.

 

'When asked, 'where are you taking me', they declined to tell her, and said it was neither the community, Nauru or a detention centre,' Ms Blucher said.

 

But at 8am, a doctor came in and told Asha's mum that she was safe, as he would not be 

discharging her unless he was satisfied a safe home was waiting for Asha.

 

That was the last Ms Blucher heard from the mother.

 

When she called at 3.15pm, she says she was told by immigration officers that Asha's mum could no longer make or receive calls.

'The Serco officers said they had been informed by border police that she was not allowed any calls - not even from her lawyers,' Ms Blucher told AAP.

 

'To hold someone incommunicado like that to me says you're about to do something that's not in their interest,' she said.

 

Refugee advocates have since surrounded the hospital in hope of blocking any officers who attempt to take Asha away.

 

GetUp Queensland spokeswoman Ellen Roberts said about 200 protesters were outside the hospital, and would maintain a 24-hour presence until they received confirmation about the family's plight.

 

 

 

Entire Article Here

 

Hmmm...sinister moves afoot?

 

 

Message 1 of 116
Latest reply
115 REPLIES 115

Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed


@icyfroth wrote:

 



 

 

Do we know how she was scalded. In what circumstance?


I think they've only ever said she was accidently scalded with boiling water.

Message 11 of 116
Latest reply

Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed

What is a safe home?

How many children get burne or scalded in ordinary homes each week?

What are we supposed to do about those children? Take them away from their mothers?

 

I am stumped about this "Safe Home" claim.

But to use an infant as a political pawn is outrageous and disgusting.

 

Erica

Message 12 of 116
Latest reply

Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed

moonflyte
Community Member

I agree,  but they are desperate people and that can lead to desperate acts.

Message 13 of 116
Latest reply

Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed

it sounds like they live in a tent Erica

 

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/true-stories/bringbackasha-campaign-gathers-momentum-as-g...

 

IF A five-month-old girl was being kept in a leaky tent surrounded by rats anywhere in Australia, she would be taken into government care. But this isgovernment care, albeit 4500km from the mainland.

 

Asha, whose pixelated face appeared on placards at snap rallies in Melbourne and Sydney this week, sleeps on a wet mattress. Her tent leaks “constantly”, according to her family’s lawyers.

 

She has trouble feeding and there and mosquitos everywhere, but Asha’s mum refuses to use the government-supplied mosquito net. It’s sprayed with chemicals, she says.

 

There’s no running water, there’s the constant threat of communicable disease and there are security guards watching over them 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It’s suicide watch for asylum seekers

 

 

that article is from last year- 

 

 

nowhere have I read any report that the mother harmed  her child on purpose either btw  - but then again I don't read Bolt

Message 14 of 116
Latest reply

Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed

and one of the really odd things is that NZ offered to re-settle these people, but the Aus. govt. refused to take up the offer.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/jan/11/new-zealands-offer-to-take-150-offshore-refuge...

 

A two-year-old offer from New Zealand to resettle 150 refugees a year from Australia’s offshore detention centres remains untouched by a reluctant Australian government, despite a public plea from people on Nauru.

The New Zealand government has since reallocated this year’s places to Syrian refugees but says the offer remains part of its official immigration policy and open to the Australian government.

 

 

I can't remember what it's costing us to keep the Naru detention centre in operation, but I remember the figures were huge

 

( at a time when the govt. should be reining in their spending)

 

 

I don't get it

Message 15 of 116
Latest reply

Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed


@lloydslights wrote:

I wonder if this is a case where Munchausen syndrome may have been considered.  

 

Is it a reason for doctor's not allowing the release of the patient, with them mentioning a "safe home"?

 

That poor baby having been scalded.  So painful.  

 

DEB


I wonder if the baby has been kept in hospital due to infection.

 

I wonder if the baby had to have some more plastic surgery done.

 

There is a lot to wonder about in this world.

 

DEB

Message 16 of 116
Latest reply

Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed

I thik it's more likely because they live in a tent

 

-which could be considered unsafe for a one year old child

Message 17 of 116
Latest reply

Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed

Anonymous
Not applicable

and one of the really odd things is that NZ offered to re-settle these people, but the Aus. govt. refused to take up the offer.

 

 

that would be to stop encouraging

people smuggling business.

 

 

NZ has taken syrian refugees

instead:

 

But a spokesperson for New Zealand Immigration Minister Michael Woodhouse said Australia has not taken up the offer and the resettlement places had instead been given to Syrian refugees.

 

In a joint address with Mr Key, Mr Abbott said that any people arriving illegally by boat would be sent to Nauru or Manus Island.

"People ought not think that New Zealand is some kind of a consolation prize if they can't come to Australia," he said.

 

New Zealand's shadow foreign affairs spokesman David Shearer said on Tuesday that the deal was never a good one.

"[New Zealand Prime Minister] John Key agreed that Australia could resettle 150 of their refugees on condition that if any boat people were coming to New Zealand then Australia would intercede," he said.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-12/nz-unable-to-accept-nauru-refugees/7082764

 

Message 18 of 116
Latest reply

Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed

so are we making an example of these people??

 

btw abbott is no longer PM/spokesman

Message 19 of 116
Latest reply

Fears Baby Asha About To Be Removed

New Zealand had offered to resettle 300 refugees as part of a two-year deal with Australia, signed in 2013 by former prime minister Julia Gillard.

 

At the time, Ms Gillard said the deal could affect asylum seekers currently being held in processing centres on Manus Island and Nauru.

 

The plan had been proposed to begin in 2014, with the annual resettlement of 150 refugees contributing to New Zealand's overall intake of 750 places each year.

 

But a spokesperson for New Zealand Immigration Minister Michael Woodhouse said Australia has not taken up the offer and the resettlement places had instead been given to Syrian refugees.

 

Former prime minister Tony Abbott quashed the plan after taking government in 2013, saying the message to people smugglers had to be "crystal clear".

 

In a joint address with Mr Key, Mr Abbott said that any people arriving illegally by boat would be sent to Nauru or Manus Island.

"People ought not think that New Zealand is some kind of a consolation prize if they can't come to Australia," he said.

 

from your article julia ( and in the order it was printed)

Message 20 of 116
Latest reply