Harry and Megsy

[lyhargr_0]

Spoilt brats or NOT?

[katistrophik]

With the entire divorce BS, I always feel for Princess Margaret, she lived a sad and lost life because she could not get permission from her sister to marry the one man she truly loved because he was a divorcee.

Her life sort of went off the rails after that, and I wonder how different it may have been if that pathetic rule was not in place back then.

Hey, Henry VIII 'The Defender of the Faith' just called them annulments, or treason......

[katistrophik]

---

@imastawka wrote:

Prince Harry on the back of a bike with Charles.

He says it was something he never did.

"I guess the highlight for me is sticking him on the back of a bicycle in his little baby seat and taking him on bike rides which is something I was never able to do when I was young.

Prince Harry DID ride bikes with his dad - Archive photos spark backlash from royal fans | Royal | N...

---

Perhaps Harry meant at the beach/public streets.......not in the ground of the palace. Just sayin'....I think it must be the feeling of being so isolated in a way that let's face it, the kid's never asked for, they were born into it.

Oncce at school they would see how other kid's lived and how they must have envied that.

[imastawka]

Then he should have clarified it.

I think the whole interview was slanted so they were seen as the victims and not the spoilt entitled brats they actually are.

[domino-710]

I reckon the whole lot should be sent to the Tower.

Useless twits. 

[imastawka]

Yes.   Indeed

Harry has been called a flashlight with no batteries.

[domino-710]

---

@imastawka wrote:

Yes.   Indeed

Harry has been called a flashlight with no batteries.

---

OK - who came up with that one. LOL

[imastawka]

Prince Harry branded ‘a flashlight with no batteries’ after Oprah interview – ‘Useless’ | Royal | Ne...

[katistrophik]

[imastawka]

In 2011, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie — the daughters of Prince Andrew — had their security stripped because they were not "working royals", leaving them to foot the reported $500,000 ($AUD900,000) a year price tag on their own.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's security crisis began long before their royal exit (msn.com)

The debate around security for members of the royal family is an old one, and there are no publicly available rules about who does and doesn’t get it. Until 2011 Prince Andrew’s daughters, Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice, had received protection at a reported cost of £500,000 per year; since then they have provided their own, and both princesses and their husbands make their own incomes. A police task force, the Royal and VIP Executive Committee, handles a list of essential public figures and royals who have round-the-clock protection funded primarily by the state.

Why Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Security Protection Was Such a Big Deal | Vanity Fair

Ten years ago.   Anyone hear the  Princesses whining?

[domino-710]

I haven't heard Peter or Zara complain either.

Still laughing at no batteries.