Harry and Megsy

Spoilt brats or NOT?

Message 1 of 171
Latest reply
170 REPLIES 170

Harry and Megsy


@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

Actually I think it would be Anne. She's older than Andrew 


It would Andrew, then his kids,  then Edward, then his kids then Anne 'cause the change only affects females born AFTER 2011

Message 71 of 171
Latest reply

Harry and Megsy

Sorry Andrew - has been pushed aside - the relevance of heir goes :

 

Charles - Son of Qe11 & Philip

 

William : Son of Charles & Diana.

 

George: son of William & Kate

 

Andrew - is now far down the track.

Message 72 of 171
Latest reply

Harry and Megsy

Then not Andrews kids then.

 

He only had girls.....before 2011

Message 73 of 171
Latest reply

Harry and Megsy


@domino-710 wrote:

Sorry Andrew - has been pushed aside - the relevance of heir goes :

 

Charles - Son of Qe11 & Philip

 

William : Son of Charles & Diana.

 

George: son of William & Kate

 

Andrew - is now far down the track.


The discussion is about Regency, not succession

 

I give up.  'It's all too hard'

 

And I don't really give a rat's................

Message 74 of 171
Latest reply

Harry and Megsy


@domino-710 wrote:

Sorry Andrew - has been pushed aside - the relevance of heir goes :

 

Charles - Son of Qe11 & Philip

 

William : Son of Charles & Diana.

 

George: son of William & Kate

 

Andrew - is now far down the track.


The question was who would be regent for Prince George? The line is as I wrote it

 

No need to be sorry

Message 75 of 171
Latest reply

Harry and Megsy

The ' discussion ' began with Succession - then the question of Regency.

Message 76 of 171
Latest reply

Harry and Megsy


@imastawka wrote:

Then not Andrews kids then.

 

He only had girls.....before 2011


They are still his kids, so they next line before Edward ............. 

Message 77 of 171
Latest reply

Harry and Megsy


@domino-710 wrote:

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

It wouldn't make much difference anyway.  he already has Charles, William, George, Charlotte and Louis ahead of him - not to mention any cildren any of them may yet produce. 


Just wondering.

 

If say - Charles on the throne - something happens - then comes William - something happens - George - how old - would be King - could Harry be called upon to be regent.


Until - this post - the question of Recency - had not come up.

Message 78 of 171
Latest reply

Harry and Megsy


@domino-710 wrote:

@domino-710 wrote:

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

It wouldn't make much difference anyway.  he already has Charles, William, George, Charlotte and Louis ahead of him - not to mention any cildren any of them may yet produce. 


Just wondering.

 

If say - Charles on the throne - something happens - then comes William - something happens - George - how old - would be King - could Harry be called upon to be regent.


Until - this post - the question of Recency - had not come up.


And my answers came AFTER this post 

 

 

Message 79 of 171
Latest reply

Harry and Megsy

Lyh - that still does not have any bearing on the line of Succession.

 

Before after posts - they so far are all living. 

Message 80 of 171
Latest reply