High Court recognises third category of gender

nero_bolt
Community Member

The list of what ifs is endless on this one

 

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/04/02/high-court-recognises-third-category-gender 

 

A Sydneysider has won a High Court case to be recognised as gender-neutral.

 

Norrie, who was born male but underwent gender reassignment to become a woman, identifies neither as male or female and has taken legal action against NSW's Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages to be granted a non-specific certificate.

 

The court was asked to consider whether "non-specific" can be included as a third gender category under the Registry's Act.

"The act recognises that a person may be neither male nor female, and so permits the registration of a person's sex as 'non specific'," read the High Court judgment, handed down on Wednesday.

 

Norrie, who goes by one name, was famously granted a world-first non-specific status in 2010, but months later the NSW government revoked the classification.

 

The matter was challenged by both Norrie and the Registry until the latter took an appeal to the High Court.

 

Lawyers for the Registry argued that unacceptable confusion would flow from the acceptance of more than two gender categories, and that the purpose of a reaffirmation procedure is to assist a person to be considered a member of the opposite sex.

 

Norrie stopped taking hormones after surgery, preferring to live as neither male nor female.

 

Counsel for Norrie said it is the register's purpose to record the truth.

 

"Norrie's sex remained ambiguous so that it would be to record misinformation in the register to classify her as male or female," a judgment summary reads.

 

Sitting in Canberra on Wednesday, the bench unanimously found in favour of Norrie.

 

"The act does not require that people who, having undergone a sex affirmation procedure ... must be registered, inaccurately, as one or the other," the court found.

 

Norrie's application for non-specific status should now be reconsidered by the Registry in accordance with the court's finding, the judgment said.

 

The Registry must pay Norrie's costs of the High Court appeal.

 

Norrie said other people wanting to identify as a non-specific gender had made contact.

 

"Many other people let me know they wanted do that (identify as non-specific) in Australia and indeed around the world," Norrie told reporters in Sydney.

 

"Maybe people will understand there's more options than the binary."

 

Norrie's solicitor, Scott McDonald, said the decision was likely to have similar repercussions in Queensland and Victoria, which have similar state legislation to NSW.

 

"It'll be binding on the states that have identical or similar legislation" he told reporters.

 

And for states such as Western Australia, with very different legislation, the judgment has sent a message the High Court doesn't think gender is limited to male and female.

 

Norrie was born a man in Scotland and had gender reassignment surgery in the late 1980s.

 

Norrie said the legal battle had taken a personal toll, but it was the lawyers who had done most of the hard work.

Message 1 of 36
Latest reply
35 REPLIES 35

Re: High Court recognises third category of gender


@nero_wulf wrote:

@2106greencat wrote:

What public 'rest room' do they use ?? Legally ??

 

Just wondering...........


 Good question? 

 

🙂


I thought so

_________________________________________________________

You can't please all the people all the time, so now I just please myself


Message 11 of 36
Latest reply

Re: High Court recognises third category of gender

Most of the forms I've filled out recently have had a third box. I can't remember what it called though.
Message 12 of 36
Latest reply

Re: High Court recognises third category of gender

He was born a male.

 

So he's a he.

 

Just because he had an operation doesn't change his gender.

Message 13 of 36
Latest reply

Re: High Court recognises third category of gender


@*elizabeths-mum* wrote:
Most of the forms I've filled out recently have had a third box. I can't remember what it called though.

  The box that says 's ex'  you answer 'yes please'

Message 14 of 36
Latest reply

Re: High Court recognises third category of gender


@nero_wulf wrote:

So what do you call this person? as in you cant refer to them as She or He so what do you refer to them as when writing or in general speech?

 

 

You can not use a gender-specific pronoun when you refer to this person....

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-specific_and_gender-neutral_pronouns

 

 

 


How do we refer to posters here when we are not sure if they are male or female?

Message 15 of 36
Latest reply

Re: High Court recognises third category of gender

This court ruling is confusing, when he was born he was a male. 

Message 16 of 36
Latest reply

Re: High Court recognises third category of gender

Simple === it's an It.

 

Woman LOL

Message 17 of 36
Latest reply

Re: High Court recognises third category of gender

If he was a boy how come now he's not?

Message 18 of 36
Latest reply

Re: High Court recognises third category of gender

....I guess it's all in the genes (not what's inside the jeans BTW! LOL). If a test? DNA i guess, was conducted then that result is what you/he/her/me would be classified as. Don't think it is based just on what actual physical parts are carried......nor just on what the person emotionally/mentally 'feels'....probably includes, for classification purposes 'how' the person conducts/portrays themselves in their daily lives to themselves and to others.

Am guessing that it would be a complicated affair but really if we are categorising someone by their 'sex' this would have to be based on what the genetic science tells us.

 

 

Message 19 of 36
Latest reply

Re: High Court recognises third category of gender

So which public toilet does he use
Photobucket
Message 20 of 36
Latest reply