on 13-04-2015 02:12 PM
...................think that homosexuality is a natural sexual orientation?
on 13-04-2015 04:31 PM
Pepe, it reminds me of the old Catholic Church stance on contraceptives.
on 13-04-2015 04:33 PM
@bluecat*dancing wrote:Correct. Isn't that what I've been saying, though?
Perhaps, nature is not just a matter of reproduction?
Perhaps, there are other factors involved?
Care to name some?
on 13-04-2015 04:34 PM
Perhaps.
on 13-04-2015 04:35 PM
@poddster wrote:Perhaps it is caused by a regressive gene 🙂
Probably - though I think the word you are looking for is recessive. The gene for blue eyes is also recessive. Only two blue-eyed parentscan produce a blue-eyed child So you could say blue eyes are not the norm either - though, of course, they are perfectly natural..
on 13-04-2015 04:37 PM
@bluecat*dancing wrote:
@poddster wrote:Again incorrest 2 people are the biological parents reproduction by one person alone is not possible.
EG. Lesbian couple. One, via artificial insemination, is impregnated and therefore is the biological parent. The sperm donor is the other biological parent. Her female partner is not the biological parent. Therefore, only one person of that particular couple is the biological parent. Reproduction occured but only one member of the same sex relationship is the biological parent.
However, without science this would not be possible. Is that what you are getting at?
But in your own word, insemination was artificial. So,not natural. Homosexual reproduction still requires the female-male connection, that's natural.
on 13-04-2015 04:38 PM
Nature does not always get it right, it makes some people that can only see Black and White and does not have the brain power to see grey.
Or in my case pink, blue, orange, yellow like a rainbow 🙂
on 13-04-2015 04:38 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@poddster wrote:Perhaps it is caused by a regressive gene 🙂
Probably - though I think the word you are looking for is recessive. The gene for blue eyes is also recessive. Only two blue-eyed parentscan produce a blue-eyed child So you could say blue eyes are not the norm either - though, of course, they are perfectly natural..
That can't be true. Or my mother didn't give birth to my brother and I didn't give birth to my daughter.
on 13-04-2015 04:39 PM
@*pepe wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@poddster wrote:
@gleee58 wrote:
@poddster wrote:So far no one has put an argument to support their claim the homosexuality is a natural state.
Yes, they have. You just chose to ignore anything that doesn't suit your agenda.
Care to show me one supporting arguement in favour of the claim that homosexuality is natural??
there is none.
It's natural to be h0rny.
Some people prefer sex with the same gender for various reasons, or have no other outlet for their sexual urges. In that case it's natural to turn to the same-sex person for gratification.
But to say homosexuality is natural when to so blatantly goes against the laws of nature is just, well...unnatural.
So let me see if i have this right - same sex couples don't reproduce so they are going against the laws of nature and are therefore unnatural?
What does that make infertile individuals unable to reproduce, animal or human - are they unnatural too?
no. just infertile. sometime nature deals out cards like that.
on 13-04-2015 04:42 PM
@icyfroth wrote:
@*pepe wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@poddster wrote:
@gleee58 wrote:
@poddster wrote:So far no one has put an argument to support their claim the homosexuality is a natural state.
Yes, they have. You just chose to ignore anything that doesn't suit your agenda.
Care to show me one supporting arguement in favour of the claim that homosexuality is natural??
there is none.
It's natural to be h0rny.
Some people prefer sex with the same gender for various reasons, or have no other outlet for their sexual urges. In that case it's natural to turn to the same-sex person for gratification.
But to say homosexuality is natural when to so blatantly goes against the laws of nature is just, well...unnatural.
So let me see if i have this right - same sex couples don't reproduce so they are going against the laws of nature and are therefore unnatural?
What does that make infertile individuals unable to reproduce, animal or human - are they unnatural too?no. just infertile. sometime nature deals out cards like that.
then why is it not possible nature dealt out the cards that makes some people prefer their own gender?
on 13-04-2015 04:42 PM
Ele I know heaps of parent both with brown eyes that have a blue eyed baby.
Depends which gene both parent throw, the brown gene will always over come the blue gene Unless both parent throw the blue eyed gene. then the baby will have blue eyes