on 13-08-2014 05:25 PM
on 15-08-2014 07:38 PM
karlia wrote:
What the heck is wrong with lower income earners instead of poor people? Labelling people as poor went out years ago and there is no need for a return to that language.
I agree.
on 15-08-2014 07:40 PM
yes, we rewound it amd watched it twice so we could all have a good laugh
on 15-08-2014 07:54 PM
@am*3 wrote:@karlia wrote:
What the heck is wrong with lower income earners instead of poor people? Labelling people as poor went out years ago and there is no need for a return to that language.
I agree.
yes, that is odd..............
in our family we use that "poor" word as a joke............
my brother in law thinks he is hard done by so we say "AAwww Poor Mick" etc.
on 15-08-2014 07:56 PM
What the heck is wrong with lower income earners instead of poor people? Labelling people as poor went out years ago and there is no need for a return to that language.
Too many words to say. Poor is just one word. You don't want them over taxing their vocal chords do you.
on 15-08-2014 07:57 PM
I think hockey just gave us all a little glimpse of what he really thinks, just like the lifter/leaner rubbish.
on 15-08-2014 07:59 PM
on 15-08-2014 08:01 PM
I feel really sad that Joe has let me down so much, I used to think he was truthful. This last year has opened my eyes.
on 15-08-2014 08:02 PM
@azureline** wrote:I feel really sad that Joe has let me down so much, I used to think he was truthful. This last year has opened my eyes.
no sadness from me but a very horrible sense of dread.
on 15-08-2014 08:02 PM
@boris1gary wrote:I think hockey just gave us all a little glimpse of what he really thinks, just like the lifter/leaner rubbish.
A lot of the language they use is from the past.
They're trying to go back in time.
on 15-08-2014 08:05 PM
Link to poll, Do you accept hockeys apology?