Interesting, but we already knew it

I wonder if the rusted on Labs from Parliament House post here as well under various guises


 


http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/investigation-into-fake-parliament-emails-20130211-2e7y...

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Message 1 of 26
Latest reply
25 REPLIES 25

Re: Interesting, but we already knew it

I haven't read the social political pages until recently .It has been a real eye opener.I wish I had a dollar for the times I read the same catch phrases repeated and saw the same grammatical errors and typing habits (ie; THe, SHe at the start of sentences,your instead of you're,same  use of capitals,same insults and use of bad language ) patterns and posting style's and same attitudes lol

Message 21 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Interesting, but we already knew it

par for the course is used so often too.

Message 22 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Interesting, but we already knew it

It's a shame the OP didn't read your post #4, Iza. Very interesting.

.
Message 23 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Interesting, but we already knew it

Hi Karen, I'd imagine that most people who'd visited those sites or others would be able to spot the same things ? .It did look like others on one site people where very aware of at least one person had many ID's.I wonder if they also had some friendlier ones that no one suspected...though I think they may have had trouble maintaining that 'nice' image going on what I've seen  ?

Message 24 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Interesting, but we already knew it

It's mindless desp.... no Iza, sorry I cannot respond. The only comments I have are not permitted here lol

.
Message 25 of 26
Latest reply

Re: Interesting, but we already knew it

The cryptic and the confused join forces, hilarious!!!!:^O

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Message 26 of 26
Latest reply