Are there any polls out there showing his popularity increase?
FN: "At least Donna's posts are not full of hate filled diatribe plagiarised from some News Corp hack or blogger. "
However FN I have noticed that DY's posts are also often not full of loving facts, or any indication that research is considered important, somewhat like a member in the past who apropos Telstra wrote:
"Telstra agreed. They signed an agreement, They negotiated a good deal. They were not forced. They made the business decision to work with NBN Co before the legislation was debated and passed."
I do like historical fictional drama though, and so some of DY's threads are also worth a chuckle or two especially when (as is normal), they stir the entrenched matriarch flock into furious PPTSD action.
@monman12 wrote:
FN: "At least Donna's posts are not full of hate filled diatribe plagiarised from some News Corp hack or blogger. "
@However FN I have noticed that DY's posts are also often not full of loving facts, or any indication that research is considered important, somewhat like a member in the past who apropos Telstra wrote:
"Telstra agreed. They signed an agreement, They negotiated a good deal. They were not forced. They made the business decision to work with NBN Co before the legislation was debated and passed."
I do like historical fictional drama though, and so some of DY's threads are also worth a chuckle or two especially when (as is normal), they stir the entrenched matriarch flock into furious PPTSD action.
The only fury is from the Ackerman and Pickering fans.
But thanks, you have just really enlightened me about the nature of the person you are by throwing around comments made on another thread some time ago.
@monman12 wrote:DY's threads are also worth a chuckle or two especially when (as is normal), they stir the entrenched matriarch flock into furious PPTSD action.
As we are seeing now with and I quote "projectile vomiting" and others with their usual hatred of anyone with a right opinion.
So amusing...... LOL and double LOL
maybe a question of citizenship ? he mightn't have a vote at all.. 
@lakeland27 wrote:
@nero_wulf wrote:
@monman12 wrote:DY's threads are also worth a chuckle or two especially when (as is normal), they stir the entrenched matriarch flock into furious PPTSD action.
As we are seeing now with and I quote "projectile vomiting" and others with their usual hatred of anyone with a right opinion.
So amusing...... LOL and double LOL
i'm glad you are friends now. expecially after the number of times he laughed at you in the past, he only lays off now because he enjoys harrassing others more. considering he voted for rudd and gillard .. or was it nobody as MM stated another time ? he's claimed both on occasions , i wonder what the truth is ?
Unlike your posts I respect MM12's post.... Are we friends... No but I agree with what he wrote here and other times, I will have a say if I dont agree with his posts and offer my opinion to him,,,,, Did he laugh at me in the past?..... you are telling the story but if he did it would have been in a polite and professional manner and I would have taken his post and opinion on board... unlike yours...
Care factor who MM12 voted for.....
You post does seem to be a rather personal one showing a personal dispute with and towards MM12.. (Maybe the moderators need to look at this personal dispute from you towards posters on here...... )
