on 02-01-2014 03:40 PM
on 02-01-2014 07:07 PM
confirmed. nought, nothing , not a sausage.
on 02-01-2014 07:08 PM
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
@lakeland27 wrote:
:what did they count LL?
qualified persons. those who actually know. no 'non-lords' and mine -owning geoligist's
Glad you think so...... Roy Spencer.... a Skeptic, was included in that number, as were other skeptics.......lol.
Alarmists have made up a lot of porkies haven't they.....
yes. he's one of the 3%.
on 02-01-2014 07:12 PM
Roy giggles when discussing it......
on 02-01-2014 07:12 PM
on 02-01-2014 07:15 PM
@lakeland27 wrote:
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
@lakeland27 wrote:
:what did they count LL?
qualified persons. those who actually know. no 'non-lords' and mine -owning geoligist's
Glad you think so...... Roy Spencer.... a Skeptic, was included in that number, as were other skeptics.......lol.
Alarmists have made up a lot of porkies haven't they.....
yes. he's one of the 3%.
No......skeptics have been included in the 97% figure....one of the non-lords that you speak of........classic.
That figure is a joke......... didn't you know?
on 02-01-2014 07:16 PM
02-01-2014 07:55 PM - edited 02-01-2014 07:58 PM
Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?
they can call you alarmists if they wish, only makes them look stoopid because, people who have studied man made climate change are not alarmed they are actually Aware! BING!!!!
but on the other hand calling them deniers, is actually fair enough because it is the truth
on 02-01-2014 07:55 PM
Mine does
on 02-01-2014 08:02 PM
@i-once-was-bump wrote:Oh so it has nothing to go with really posh (fine denier) sock puppets but it is deny-ers.
It doesn't look like deny-ers but it looks like stockings, oh well back to kitchen to stare at the tap waiting for inspiration.
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/denier-2
noun
02-01-2014 08:32 PM - edited 02-01-2014 08:33 PM
Maurice Newman's flat-earth thinking ignores climate change facts
Maurice Newman is chairman of the Prime Minister's Business Advisory Council. He must have thought that December 31 was April Fool's Day when he wrote an opinion piece in The Australian headed "Crowds go cold on climate cost".
He once again revealed his opinions on climate change science when he wrote "the scientific delusion, the religion behind the climate crusade, is crumbling" and "Australia, too, has become hostage to climate change madness".
The key conclusions on climate change science from the Australian Academy of Science, the Royal Society of London and the US National Academy of Science have been confirmed with even greater confidence by the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), released in September 2013.
They include:
Mr Newman writes that "global temperatures have gone nowhere for 17 years", but the global average surface temperature has warmed over the period 1997 to 2013, ocean heat content has increased significantly, and Arctic sea ice extent has declined, all showing clearly the continued warming of the climate system.
Australia has just set a new record in 2013 for the hottest calendar year temperature averaged across the whole country, unprecedented in more than a hundred years of instrumental observations and outside the range that can be explained by natural variability alone.
He also writes "when necessary the IPCC resorts to dishonesty and deceit", but none of the many independent inquiries in the US and the UK into scientists involved in the IPCC have found any evidence to support these claims.
Unlike Mr Newman, leading inte
the above article suggests the title Fools for deniers such as Maurice Newmann...
The title denier fits someone who rejects science