Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?

I've been thinking about it but there are better words I am sure 🙂

Photobucket
Message 1 of 97
Latest reply
96 REPLIES 96

Re: Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?

confirmed. nought, nothing , not a sausage. 

Message 61 of 97
Latest reply

Re: Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?


@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:

@lakeland27 wrote:

:

what did they count LL?

 


 qualified persons. those who actually know.  no 'non-lords' and mine -owning geoligist's 


Glad you think so...... Roy Spencer.... a Skeptic, was included in that number, as were other skeptics.......lol.

 

Alarmists have made up a lot of porkies haven't they.....

 

 


yes. he's one of the 3%.

Message 62 of 97
Latest reply

Re: Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?

Roy giggles when discussing it......Woman Very Happy

 

 



____________________________
"High and low pressure systems cause the day-to-day changes in our weather." ...Metoffice.......


siggie-reported-by-alarmists..............
Message 63 of 97
Latest reply

Re: Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?

Said it before, will say it again:

 

64% of all statistics are made up            lmao smiley.gif

Message 64 of 97
Latest reply

Re: Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?


@lakeland27 wrote:

@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:

@lakeland27 wrote:

:

what did they count LL?

 


 qualified persons. those who actually know.  no 'non-lords' and mine -owning geoligist's 


Glad you think so...... Roy Spencer.... a Skeptic, was included in that number, as were other skeptics.......lol.

 

Alarmists have made up a lot of porkies haven't they.....

 

 


yes. he's one of the 3%.


No......skeptics have been included in the 97% figure....one of the non-lords that you speak of........classic.

 

That figure is a joke......... didn't you know?

 



____________________________
"High and low pressure systems cause the day-to-day changes in our weather." ...Metoffice.......


siggie-reported-by-alarmists..............
Message 65 of 97
Latest reply

Re: Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?

Does the light in the fridge go out when you close the door siggie? 🙂

Photobucket
Message 66 of 97
Latest reply

Re: Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?

 Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?

 

 

they can call you alarmists if they wish, only makes them look stoopid because, people who have studied man made climate change are not alarmed they are actually Aware! BING!!!!

 

 

but on the other hand calling them deniers, is actually fair enough because it is the truthRobot LOL 


Signatures suck.
Message 67 of 97
Latest reply

Re: Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?

Mine does

Message 68 of 97
Latest reply

Re: Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?


@i-once-was-bump wrote:

Oh so it has nothing to go with really posh (fine denier) sock puppets but it is deny-ers.

 

It doesn't look like deny-ers but it looks like stockings, oh well back to kitchen to stare at the tap waiting for inspiration.


http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/denier-2

 

noun

  • a person who denies something, especially someone who refuses to admit the truth of a concept or proposition that is supported by the majority of scientific or historical evidence:a prominent denier of global warminga climate change denier
Message 69 of 97
Latest reply

Re: Is it fair to call people deniers when they call others alarmists?

Maurice Newman's flat-earth thinking ignores climate change facts

Date January 1, 2014

 

Maurice Newman is chairman of the Prime Minister's Business Advisory Council. He must have thought that December 31 was April Fool's Day when he wrote an opinion piece in The Australian headed "Crowds go cold on climate cost".

He once again revealed his opinions on climate change science when he wrote "the scientific delusion, the religion behind the climate crusade, is crumbling" and "Australia, too, has become hostage to climate change madness".

 


 

 

 

 

The key conclusions on climate change science from the Australian Academy of Science, the Royal Society of London and the US National Academy of Science have been confirmed with even greater confidence by the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), released in September 2013.

They include:

  • There is no doubt that the climate system has warmed over the past 100 years and continues to warm.
  • It is beyond reasonable doubt that human influences, through burning fossil fuels, industrial activity and land clearing, have been the main cause of the observed global warming since the mid 20th century.
  • Continued emissions of greenhouse gases from human activity will cause further warming and changes in all components of the climate system.
  • Limiting climate change will require substantial and sustained reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.

Mr Newman writes that "global temperatures have gone nowhere for 17 years", but the global average surface temperature has warmed over the period 1997 to 2013, ocean heat content has increased significantly, and Arctic sea ice extent has declined, all showing clearly the continued warming of the climate system.

Australia has just set a new record in 2013 for the hottest calendar year temperature averaged across the whole country, unprecedented in more than a hundred years of instrumental observations and outside the range that can be explained by natural variability alone.

He also writes "when necessary the IPCC resorts to dishonesty and deceit", but none of the many independent inquiries in the US and the UK into scientists involved in the IPCC have found any evidence to support these claims.

Unlike Mr Newman, leading inte



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/maurice-newmans-flatearth-thinking-ignores-...

 

 

 

the above article suggests the title Fools for deniers such as Maurice Newmann...

 

The title denier fits someone who rejects science 

Message 70 of 97
Latest reply