It's supposed to be just so simple.

go-tazz
Community Member

The virus moves because people move it.

 

If people stop moving the virus dies.

 

That's all there is to it.Corny_cleaning-glasses.gif

 

Which is why we are at the stage we are now because people refuse to stop moving,ships were passengers

 

allowed in and further cases would come from flights coming in and they have to self isolate but need to get

 

home first and get supplies so will be active before they can isolate.Angry head bang.gif

 

 

 

 

Message 1 of 67
Latest reply
66 REPLIES 66

It's supposed to be just so simple.


@halfgweilo wrote:
kazumi.. I hope you have watched tonight's 60 minute on TV. The latter part of the show. China did not mishandled the epidemic? They just lied through their teeth, that's all. To the WHO and God knows to who else. Is that not enough? The word is death, not deah.

No, i did NOT watch 60 minutes.  Since when is 60 minutes considered reliable source of information?

Thanks for letting me know I made a typo. 

Message 51 of 67
Latest reply

It's supposed to be just so simple.


@halfgweilo wrote:
kazumi.. I hope you have watched tonight's 60 minute on TV. The latter part of the show. China did not mishandled the epidemic? They just lied through their teeth, that's all. To the WHO and God knows to who else. Is that not enough? The word is death, not deah.

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.vox.com/2020/3/4/21156607/how-did-the-coronavirus-get-started-china-wuhan-lab


 

Message 52 of 67
Latest reply

It's supposed to be just so simple.


kazumi.. Point taken, 60 minutes is not always a reliable source of information. I suppose you don't watch the news on TV or read the newspapers at all. Pray tell, where did you get all your information from, especially on what's happening in India.
Message 53 of 67
Latest reply

It's supposed to be just so simple.


@halfgweilo wrote:

kazumi.. Point taken, 60 minutes is not always a reliable source of information. I suppose you don't watch the news on TV or read the newspapers at all. Pray tell, where did you get all your information from, especially on what's happening in India.

It looks like India could be a lot worse then the US:

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/30/india/india-coronavirus-social-distancing-intl-hnk/index.html

Message 54 of 67
Latest reply

It's supposed to be just so simple.


@go-tazz wrote:

@rogespeed wrote:

@go-tazz wrote:

Human corona viruses are spread from someone infected with COVID-19 virus to other close contacts with

 

that person through contaminated droplets spread by coughing or sneezing, or by contact with

 

contaminated hands,surfaces or objects.

 

The time between when a person is exposed to the virus and when symptoms first appear is typically 5 to

 

6 days,although may range from 2 to 14 days. For this reason, people who might have been in contact

 

with a confirmed case are being asked to self-isolate for 14 days.

 

Most COVID-19 cases appear to be spread from people who have symptoms. A small number of people

 

may have been infectious before their symptoms developed.

 

All about Covid- 19


https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/alerts/Pages/coronavirus-faqs.aspx#1-3


Just a minor update :  Corvid-19 is the disease - so you suffer from rather than being infected by .  SARS-CoV-2 is the virus which infects , so causing the Covid-19 disease. 

cheers 

 


The link to that article is above so no good telling me so you better let NSW Health know that they are wrong and

 

you are right and that they and everyone else is using wrong terminology.stubborn_smiley_by_mirz123-d4bt0te_zps12f1a5a3.gif

 

You should then let every website that uses the wrong terminoligy know that they are wrong as well and as just

 

about every website uses Corona virus or Covid-19 in their articles it should keep you busy fro a while.good.gif


Because thay are talking about the disease not the virus 

Message 55 of 67
Latest reply

It's supposed to be just so simple.


@rogespeed wrote:


Because thay are talking about the disease not the virus 


It came across as you having a go at me so next time clarrify that you were having a go at the link and everyone

 

uses Coronavirus (COVID-19) when they talk about the virus so going by anything else is pointless as most

 

people wouldn't recognise SARS-CoV-2 as part of the Coronavirus.stubborn_smiley_by_mirz123-d4bt0te_zps12f1a5a3.gif

 

 

Message 56 of 67
Latest reply

It's supposed to be just so simple.


@go-tazz wrote:

@rogespeed wrote:


Because thay are talking about the disease not the virus 


It came across as you having a go at me so next time clarrify that you were having a go at the link and everyone

 

uses Coronavirus (COVID-19) when they talk about the virus so going by anything else is pointless as most

 

people wouldn't recognise SARS-CoV-2 as part of the Coronavirus.stubborn_smiley_by_mirz123-d4bt0te_zps12f1a5a3.gif

 

 


Is pointless to the general public - although I think people should be aware of that small detail - 

 SARS-CoV-2 virus +  infection + bodies response = disease called Covid-19 

 

Most people attend a football match to watch a football game ( read about the disease ) rather than attend a game to watch a particular player ( read about the virus) , however some have an interest in the player 

Message 57 of 67
Latest reply

It's supposed to be just so simple.


@rogespeed wrote:

Is pointless to the general public - although I think people should be aware of that small detail - 

 SARS-CoV-2 virus +  infection + bodies response = disease called Covid-19 

 

No they don't as it's just you being pedantic about something that's of no interest to anyone else as calling it a

 

SARS related virus will/might only confuse people into thinking that it's a SARS outbreak.

Hence why the Government and Health EXPERTS keep calling it Cononavirus or COVID-19

 

Most people attend a football match to watch a football game ( read about the disease ) rather than attend a game to watch a particular player ( read about the virus) , however some have an interest in the player 


All the other information is out there so if they have an interest then they can read it there.Corny_cleaning-glasses.gif

Message 58 of 67
Latest reply

It's supposed to be just so simple.


@rogespeed wrote:

@go-tazz wrote:

@rogespeed wrote:


Because thay are talking about the disease not the virus 


It came across as you having a go at me so next time clarrify that you were having a go at the link and everyone

 

uses Coronavirus (COVID-19) when they talk about the virus so going by anything else is pointless as most

 

people wouldn't recognise SARS-CoV-2 as part of the Coronavirus.stubborn_smiley_by_mirz123-d4bt0te_zps12f1a5a3.gif

 

 


Is pointless to the general public - although I think people should be aware of that small detail - 

 SARS-CoV-2 virus +  infection + bodies response = disease called Covid-19 

 

Most people attend a football match to watch a football game ( read about the disease ) rather than attend a game to watch a particular player ( read about the virus) , however some have an interest in the player 


LOL - that is knotty.

Message 59 of 67
Latest reply

It's supposed to be just so simple.


@halfgweilo wrote:

kazumi.. Point taken, 60 minutes is not always a reliable source of information. I suppose you don't watch the news on TV or read the newspapers at all. Pray tell, where did you get all your information from, especially on what's happening in India.

I do watch news on the ABC, SBS, American ABC or AlJazeera.  Plus I subscribe to NY Times, and various scientific publications. 

60 minutes is an entertainment; they are not journalists.  Journalist report events, 60 minutes creates stories albeit based on something real, but basically they make it contraversial to attract vewer and make money for their network. 

Message 60 of 67
Latest reply