on โ03-03-2014 10:01 AM
Who could the "demented Plutocrat'' turnbull spoke of be ? the conclusion most come to is of course Rupert murdoch . Nobody else fits the description despite turnbulls dubious claim he was reffering to William Randolph Hearst.. "Citizen Kane''
should turnbull be watching his back ? i hope so .. there may be just a little resentment on display here from Mal, having to flog a somewhat trashed version of the NBN and destroying his own cred at Ruperts request and tones insistence to appease rupert.
He must realise by now the PM's job will never be his.
the comments are the real story here http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/02/demented-plutocrat-remark-was-not-about-rupert-murdoch-...
Solved! Go to Solution.
on โ03-03-2014 10:23 AM
on โ03-03-2014 10:23 AM
on โ03-03-2014 10:46 AM
@boris1gary wrote:is there such a thing as talkers remorse?
well, he is most likely wishing he didn't make a rare truthful remark, perhaps the stress of selling a lemon got to him and his tongue won the battle with his survival instinct . despite his slippery denial, he's just shot his own ambition in the foot
on โ03-03-2014 10:52 AM
Talkers remorse for a "slip of the tongue"more probably regret, however I do wonder if chagrin could apply to some CS posts!
nษฅยบษพ
on โ03-03-2014 11:02 AM
thats fine , but what do you think MM ?
on โ03-03-2014 12:34 PM
on โ03-03-2014 12:37 PM
he never does these days.
on โ03-03-2014 01:00 PM
probably tired of repeating himself?
on โ03-03-2014 01:09 PM
on โ03-03-2014 01:17 PM
maybe he just has better things to do.