on 19-06-2013 09:47 AM
Day 3 of the great 'You have to play the game my way or you can't play in my sandpit ner ner' week and I see it has created the biggest them and us type divide on the boards since the great malicious code scandal aka malwaregate.
Congratulations. 😐
on 19-06-2013 10:59 AM
lol, are you serious. This is nuthin compared to the tiffs in the past
got that straight....I remember veritable wars on the rt, it was only the last six months that we all joined together and partied like a community...a common cause does that.
on 19-06-2013 10:59 AM
on 19-06-2013 10:59 AM
Oh, I'm watching my girlish figure and dont have any *sad face*
on 19-06-2013 11:02 AM
Pepe...for once I 100% agree with you.
I do not abuse people with different political opinions yet I feel like I have been put into a "them" category because I really do enjoy the political debates... so I am left to feel like I have done something wrong and need to be ignored by people that I usually get on well with.
This has created a big divide...
on 19-06-2013 11:04 AM
What ya talking about
on 19-06-2013 11:07 AM
on 19-06-2013 11:11 AM
catsback, I don't consider you one of 'them'.....'they', have a very long history of overbearing this place and dividing people
I too enjoy a lively political debate, but the name calling leaves me cold....how about you?....don't we see enough of that from our so called leaders?
btw, I don't have anyone on ignore...I can ignore droning without an ignore button = no interest in it....I've found that if you engage 'them' in debate, you end up 'disappeared'...so no thanks.
on 19-06-2013 11:11 AM
Cats back, I know that I have seen several people say that they don't include you amongst the spammers as you have always put forward your point of view.
on 19-06-2013 11:12 AM
neither side gaining or loosing ground,
that's not quite correct Kilroy.I and at least one other voter has said that due to the style of campaign ....we will not be voting Liberal .
They lost our votes
on 19-06-2013 11:14 AM
it's all made me take a closer look than I otherwise would have ...perhaps not the desired result