Odds Shorten On Bill For PM


GOODBYE carbon tax, hello yet another round of reform for our financial system.

 

Prime Minister Tony Abbott finally, finally, got Clive and his PUPpets to back the axing of the stupidest and most pointlessly destructive tax in Australia’s history.

 

Only for Opposition Leader Bill Shorten to immediately announce his total unfitness to ever be PM, by promising there would be a carbon tax (in the form of an emissions trading scheme) under a government it would be the country’s misfortune for him to ever lead.

 

The PM made three big promises at the election. Axing the tax, stopping the boats and fixing the deficits. He’s now delivered on two of them, and it’s only the “unrepresentative swill” in the Senate — in former Labor PM Paul Keating’s pungent words — that’s stopping him on the third.

 

Well, actually Shorten is also playing his part and making an impressive play to claim the title of stupidest Opposition Leader in our history. Faced with the chance of having Gillard’s carbon tax yoke removed from around his neck, thanks to the PM, he’s instead put it straight back on.

 

And faced with the chance of having this PM take all the tough, vote-costing decisions, enabling a Shorten-led Opposition both to almost amble into office at the next election and inherit a budget in the black — just like Kevin Rudd did in 2007 ——Shorten’s said “no thanks”.

 

The only reason the Greens and Clive’s PUPpets have any power to stop the Budget is because Shorten’s Opposition won’t take the responsible path of letting the Abbott Government fix the mess created by the Rudd and Gillard governments of which Shorten was a prominent member.

 

Entire Article Here

 

Wonder who the ALP will trot out for the next election after they axe Bill?

 

 

Message 1 of 40
Latest reply
39 REPLIES 39

Re: Odds Shorten On Bill For PM

If you are struggling to comprehend my post may I suggest you do your research before making an erroneous comment.

Message 11 of 40
Latest reply

Re: Odds Shorten On Bill For PM

lol icyfroth,  a bit like responding to posts that dont concern her and making assumptions. A trait perhaps? Smiley LOL

Message 12 of 40
Latest reply

Re: Odds Shorten On Bill For PM

Hello, everyone. This discussion is getting a little heated. Could we please communicate with a more civil tone. Thanks!

Message 13 of 40
Latest reply

Re: Odds Shorten On Bill For PM

Icy you got the title a lot wrong ( unless you ARE a Bill Shorten fan?) i choose not to read the blurb written in the Herald or wherever your link goes to.
Message 14 of 40
Latest reply

Re: Odds Shorten On Bill For PM

I think it was a clever play on words. icyfroth Woman Happy I dont see the need for pedantic perseverance but hey, Robot wink some feel the need whilst others just see the funny side and move on.Woman Happy

Message 15 of 40
Latest reply

Re: Odds Shorten On Bill For PM


@lightningdance wrote:

If you are struggling to comprehend my post may I suggest you do your research before making an erroneous comment.


Which erroneous comment?

 

Conroy is still a Senator and Carr is not, nothing erroneous there, is there.

Message 16 of 40
Latest reply

Re: Odds Shorten On Bill For PM

Bill For PMWoman Happy

 

Bill.jpg

Message 17 of 40
Latest reply

Re: Odds Shorten On Bill For PM

Oh oh... another petard? and still not  correct...lol soooooo funny

Message 18 of 40
Latest reply

Re: Odds Shorten On Bill For PM


@lightningdance wrote:

Oh oh... another petard? and still not  correct...lol soooooo funny


So what is it then?  Instead of laughing about the error how about clarifying what is wrong with the statemenht that Carr is not and Conroy is still a Senator. 

 

Perhaps you would be so kind as to explain what is another petard as well.

Message 19 of 40
Latest reply

Re: Odds Shorten On Bill For PM


@lightningdance wrote:

lol icyfroth,  a bit like responding to posts that dont concern her and making assumptions. A trait perhaps? Smiley LOL


I think you will find that posters can respond to whoever and whenever they wish, it's a trait of cs. No perhaps about it.

Message 20 of 40
Latest reply