Oscar Pistorius

[nevynreally]

I'm surprised there's no thread already about this. Is it because it's not an Australian case?

[lionrose.7]

A Murderer is a Murderer, I dont care if he has no legs or four legs.

Any one that kills is a monster in my book.

Her can make all the excuses he wants, there is a family mourning a dead daughter, because of him.

[4c4sale]

---

@lionrose.7 wrote:

A Murderer is a Murderer, I dont care if he has no legs or four legs.

Any one that kills is a monster in my book.

Her can make all the excuses he wants, there is a family mourning a dead daughter, because of him.

---

The judge saw it differently, and she knows a great deal more about it than any of us.

[cherry*135]

The judges decision can be appealed. Judges decisions do get overturned on appeals sometimes.

[lionrose.7]

So you think he accidently killed Reeva!!! and should not serve time.

Trying to find out what your believe happened

[freddie*rooster]

---

@4c4sale wrote:

---

@lionrose.7 wrote:

A Murderer is a Murderer, I dont care if he has no legs or four legs.

Any one that kills is a monster in my book.

Her can make all the excuses he wants, there is a family mourning a dead daughter, because of him.

---

The judge saw it differently, and she knows a great deal more about it than any of us.

---

She might be a Judge but consensus would agree she got it wrong. We were privy to all the evidence via the Defence and Prosecution cases and the overwhelming evidence should have lead to a guilty verdict.

[4c4sale]

---

@am*3 wrote:

The judges decision can be appealed. Judges decisions do get overturned on appeals sometimes.

---

Maybe we'll learn more if that happens.

[4c4sale]

---

@freddie*rooster wrote:

---

@4c4sale wrote:

---

@lionrose.7 wrote:

A Murderer is a Murderer, I dont care if he has no legs or four legs.

Any one that kills is a monster in my book.

Her can make all the excuses he wants, there is a family mourning a dead daughter, because of him.

---

The judge saw it differently, and she knows a great deal more about it than any of us.

---

She might be a Judge but consensus would agree she got it wrong. We were privy to all the evidence via the Defence and Prosecution cases and the overwhelming evidence should have lead to a guilty verdict.

---

Isn't it culpable homicide? Sounds right given the circumstantial nature of the case presented.

[freddie*rooster]

I still believe she got it wrong.

Tell me why you think Reeva was in the toilet with her phone?

[4c4sale]

---

@freddie*rooster wrote:

I still believe she got it wrong.

Tell me why you think Reeva was in the toilet with her phone?

---

I have many friends who use the loo for privacy when making mobile calls.

It was the prosecution's job to make the case for Oscar's murderous intent, and they could not do so successfully.

I have no interest in making a case one way or the other, and I'm no more privy to information which could properly inform my speculations than you are.

[lionrose.7]

Ok explain this, he hit her with a Baseball bat before she ran in to the toilet to get away and was shot, that is way she had the phone in the loo calling for help.

Remember at the trail the Judge said the witnesses could not have heard her scream because she had been hit with a BAT

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2283507/Oscar-Pistorius-DID-beat-model-girlfriend-Reeva-Stee...