Paris manhunt: 3 gunmen at large, 12 shot dead at Charlie Hebdo offices

[prophecyfulfilled]

http://rt.com/news/220603-manhunt-paris-charlie-hebdo/

No terrorist group has yet claimed responsibility for the attack. However, an Islamic State militant praised the attack on the French satirical magazine on Wednesday.

"The lions of Islam have avenged our Prophet," Abu Mussab, who fights for IS insurgents in Syria, told Reuters via internet connection. "These are our lions. It's the first drops – more will follow," he said, speaking via an internet connection from Syria. He added that he and his fellow fighters are happy about the incident.

Mussab said he did not know the gunmen who carried out the attack, but added "they are on the path of the emir [IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi]....and our Sheikh Osama (bin Laden)."

Reports suggest that the cartoons portraying Prophet Mohammed published earlier by the satirical paper were the reason for the attack. The gunmen reportedly called out the victims by name, shouting: “We have avenged the prophet."

The religion of peace at it again.

[raptor_rebooted]

---

@j*oono wrote:

Terrorist attacks seem to serve their purpose.

It get's everyone together to have a good old squabble and rabble rouse the haters which promotes further segregation.

---

really?

is that what you think these people

are doing?

[icyfroth]

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Someone's let the Grade 3 children out early today.

---

How quick they are to abuse, and how slow invisible when an apology is warranted.

Scurried back under their rocks.

---

from whom were you expecting an apology?

[azureline**]

I don't speak for Polks but I suspect you should offer one for your accusation. It was clearly incorrect.

[punch*drunk]

---

@outdoorhunting1 wrote:

---

@punch*drunk wrote:

but they were targeting a much more dangerous group.

---

You mean the Religion of Peace ?

---

No, I mean IS

[raptor_rebooted]

so, do you understand why ddb made

that comment?

your response to it  shows that you didn't.

[the_hawk*]

---

@azureline** wrote:

I don't speak for Polks but I suspect you should offer one for your accusation. It was clearly incorrect.

---

I would think she will get in the same dream as Polks does for her insults in regards to rocks

[j*oono]

Not seeing that here Julia.

[gleee58]

---

@katymatey* wrote:

Left identity card in car?  🙂

Smart as well as a fanatical murdering barstool.

---

Or was an easy target to be set up by someone else.

[azureline**]

Your response to my post indicates you didn't understand mine.

[icyfroth]

I can show largesse in apologising if Polks can do the same