Paris manhunt: 3 gunmen at large, 12 shot dead at Charlie Hebdo offices

[prophecyfulfilled]

http://rt.com/news/220603-manhunt-paris-charlie-hebdo/

No terrorist group has yet claimed responsibility for the attack. However, an Islamic State militant praised the attack on the French satirical magazine on Wednesday.

"The lions of Islam have avenged our Prophet," Abu Mussab, who fights for IS insurgents in Syria, told Reuters via internet connection. "These are our lions. It's the first drops – more will follow," he said, speaking via an internet connection from Syria. He added that he and his fellow fighters are happy about the incident.

Mussab said he did not know the gunmen who carried out the attack, but added "they are on the path of the emir [IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi]....and our Sheikh Osama (bin Laden)."

Reports suggest that the cartoons portraying Prophet Mohammed published earlier by the satirical paper were the reason for the attack. The gunmen reportedly called out the victims by name, shouting: “We have avenged the prophet."

The religion of peace at it again.

[azureline**]

---

@iapetus_rocks wrote:

But, but, but . . . you agreed with this statement by Donohue;

"But neither should we tolerate the kind of intolerance that provoked this violent reaction."

You can't have it both ways.

---

Yes I can, I can agree with what he says. I am not alone either.

[azureline**]

---

@iapetus_rocks wrote:

Don't you understand that those cartoons from Charlie Hebdo were precisely in response to the intolerance and hate and violence  manifested by Islam?

---

Please provide a verifiable source of the proof of that statement.

Many Muslims live in harmony with others, going about their daily lives, not demanding anything of anyone, not committing terrorist acts, nor intending to.

[gleee58]

---

@nevynreally wrote:

---

@azureline** wrote:

---

@lal-au0 wrote:

---

@azureline** wrote:

---

@iapetus_rocks wrote:

So expect it from Islam as well. and offer your criticism.

---

You can't comprehend that it includes everybody?

What should I be critiqueing?

---

you could critique people for murdering other people just because they didn't share their opinion or drawing a picture.

you think it's ok to kill people for satire but you think it's not ok to critique people for killing other people.

that's just plain sick.

---

You are the sick one if you are implying, or saying, that I said that, or think it.

---

Well, that's how it comes across. They shouldn't have poked the beast, therefore, they deserve. Read it back in the morning, maybe you'll see it then.

---

I think she meant she would prefer people didn't disrespect others by taking the publishing mickey out of others and would also prefer if people didn't retaliate for said mickey taking with murder.

[nevynreally]

---

@azureline** wrote:

---

Please provide a verifiable source of the proof of that statement.

Many Muslims live in harmony with others, going about their daily lives, not demanding anything of anyone, not committing terrorist acts, nor intending to.

---

Yes they do. But there are some who don't, do they get a free ride? What about the people these harmounious "muslims" kill in cold blood? Collataral damage? IYO of course.

Je suis Charlie

[iapetus_rocks]

Sorry for the blank post, above. I misread your post and "mis-spoke" 😉

Again, if you haven't seen and understood the message of the cartoons (granted they are in French), you will not understand.

They satirise certain opinions and certain actions. Anyway, I'm not the person to ask here, you need to ask the journalists of Charlie Hebdo. oh, that's right, you can't.

[nevynreally]

---

@gleee58 wrote:

---

@nevynreally wrote:

---

@azureline** wrote:

---

@lal-au0 wrote:

---

@azureline** wrote:

---

@iapetus_rocks wrote:

So expect it from Islam as well. and offer your criticism.

---

You can't comprehend that it includes everybody?

What should I be critiqueing?

---

you could critique people for murdering other people just because they didn't share their opinion or drawing a picture.

you think it's ok to kill people for satire but you think it's not ok to critique people for killing other people.

that's just plain sick.

---

You are the sick one if you are implying, or saying, that I said that, or think it.

---

Well, that's how it comes across. They shouldn't have poked the beast, therefore, they deserve. Read it back in the morning, maybe you'll see it then.

---

I think she meant she would prefer people didn't disrespect others by taking the publishing mickey out of others and would also prefer if people didn't retaliate for said mickey taking with murder.

---

You know what? Not everyone agrees with your opinion on what life should be.  If you can't live and let live then maybe you just shouldn't give into your basic instincts.  

Don't shoot the messaganger who doesn't agree with you. 

A lot of that happens around here.

[gleee58]

I don't care who agrees with what. I just added my opinion.  

[nevynreally]

---

@iapetus_rocks wrote:

Again, if you haven't seen and understood the message of the cartoons (granted they are in French), you will not understand.

They satirise certain opinions and certain actions. Anyway, I'm not the person to ask here, you need to ask the journalists of Charlie Hebdo. oh, that's right, you can't.

---

Point scoring =loser

I feel for their families. Didn't get to say goodbye. Faced with the aftermath  of this. And here you lot point score.

[iapetus_rocks]

I wasn't trying to point-score. We are all losers here.