on โ08-03-2014 02:29 PM
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-08/malaysia-airlines-lost-contact-with-plane/5307888
Malaysia Airlines says one of its planes has gone missing on the way from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 239 people on board.
A statement from the airline says flight MH370 lost contact with air traffic controllers at 2:40am local time, just over two hours into the flight.
The plane, a Boeing 777-200, left Kuala Lumpur at 12:41am on Saturday, and had been due to arrive in Beijing at 6:30am local time.
The company says the plane was carrying 227 passengers, including two infants, and 12 crew members.
The airline says it is contacting the next-of-kin of all passengers and crew, which includes people of 13 different nationalities.
In a statement on the airline's website, group chief executive officer Ahmad Jauhari Yahya said the airline was working with authorities to locate the aircraft.
"Focus of the airline is to work with the emergency responders and authorities and mobilise its full support," the statement said.
"Our thoughts and prayers are with all affected passengers and crew and their family members."
The airline says it will provide regular updates on its website.
The ABC understand Malaysia Airlines will hold a press conference on the incident shortly.
on โ03-04-2014 12:15 PM
@*jimmy1717* wrote:Something interesting...this thread has 840 posts. The same thread on the ebayUS has 844 replies.
And the OP is Paints US counterpart.
on โ03-04-2014 03:31 PM
"I have no argument against that, She-el but the way other posters are dissed by inferring their comments are less than intelligent, indeed called nutty and other rude terms, is arrogance beyond belief!"
I would assert that most of what is posted by P007 is nutty beyond belief, and lacking in knowledge and logic.
Not arrogance on my part but based upon a little expertise/experience in the field of a aviation, engineering, crash beacon location, and military operations all of which would be foreign to the kernel!.
"Especially when all the technological information and "intelligent" discussion has not got anyone one iota closer to the planes whereabouts."
Like P007 theories IF, that is nonsense. The various information collected and data interpretation by the authorities have arrived at a track, and likely area for the aircraft to have ditched.
nษฅยบษพ
on โ03-04-2014 04:10 PM
I wrote:
To me that seems like a reasonably intelligent conversation.
Icy wrote:
I have no argument against that, She-el but the way other posters are dissed by inferring their comments are less than intelligent, indeed called nutty and other rude terms, is arrogance beyond belief!
You mean comments like this;?
WOBBLE [Clap!] DOPPLER [clap!] COMPUTATION [wiggle] SHIFT [clap!!]
.....but same as icy has put to sheheffalump....have youse found the plane yet?
on โ03-04-2014 11:11 PM
โ04-04-2014 01:08 AM - edited โ04-04-2014 01:09 AM
this whole 'affair' is very, very suss-pishuss.........planes go 'missing'............posts go 'missing'...........*tsk tsk*
on โ04-04-2014 01:41 AM
to the sheheffalump: you stated ..."the OTHR is set up to pick up objects coming towards it or goingaway from it, not travelling past it."
what a load of bunkum!!
at some point the plane would have had to 'move away' *geez
Radar aside.....WHAT ABOUT THE
200 PLUS SATELLITES UP THERE
ORBITING OUR PLANET
24/7.....one of these must have tracking details of our missing plane.....either in flight (if it was actually in flight) ....or pics of it landing somewhere like debris from crashing? (if it did in fact crash)
Don't shoot me but isn't the correct term in geosynchronous orbit ....?
where satellites are programmed to each cover a particular area of the planet Earth.....so we end up with a 'map' of data.
We don't need radar.
Satellites would have seen 'our' plane for sure
why have we not been told the truth?
on โ04-04-2014 01:56 AM
to colic: who said "...
Satellites would not have been tracking the plane
Satellites only take pictures of what they are programmed to take pictures of.....and it's generally not Planes.......
It would be impossible to take and store pictures of random items worldwide that they are not targeted to take pictures
of.
The satellite pictures that are being provided now looking for wreckage have been taken only after retargetting the
satellites to the search areas....... well and truly after the fact..........etc etc
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
these satellites can be controlled from planet Earth. They often use these satellites for spying on other countries and therefore need to be able to point/face- whatever the term used is i do not care(!).....towards whatever it is that 'they' want to W-a-t-c-h and monitor.
*geez.
It does not take 4 weeks to re-target a friggin state of the art, high tech space cadet satellite.
It takes 5 mins for a signal from Earth to Mars to control the CURIOSITY ROVER!! so would not take days nor weeks to retarget one or three or fifty of the 200 plus satellites available in order to locate and take pics of the missing plane.
unless, as I originally proposed much earlier on, is infact true....that our missing plane was the target of a missile of some sort....OR 'they' simply don't want us to know 'where' our plane and all on board ended up.
End of story.
on โ04-04-2014 07:48 AM - last edited on โ04-04-2014 11:40 AM by luna-2304
paintsew007 wrote:: so would not take days nor weeks to retarget one or three or fifty of the 200 plus satellites available in order to locate and take pics of the missing plane.
How would they know to reprogram or whatever when they didn't know the plane was missing??
By the time they knew, what were these 200 odd satejlites meant to take a photo of ?
on โ04-04-2014 09:25 AM
@2106greencat wrote:painspew wrote:: so would not take days nor weeks to retarget one or three or fifty of the 200 plus satellites available in order to locate and take pics of the missing plane.
How would they know to reprogram or whatever when they didn't know the plane was missing??
By the time they knew, what were these 200 odd satejlites meant to take a photo of ?
Do all those satellites take photos?
on โ04-04-2014 11:07 AM
For a few days now I've been thinking, in my funny little unresearched way ... I wonder if they're not finding the plane because that's not where it is?
This morning's headline:
Is the MH370 Even In The Indian Ocean?
Not a single piece of wreckage from the lost plane has been found, not even after a new analysis led investigators to change the focus of their search yet again. The latest search area is based on extremely limited satellite data combined with radar data taken some five hours before the plane is believed to have gone down. It is, as one search official said, "a very inexact science."
Last week, using revised estimates of how fast the plane was traveling when it left the Malacca strait, investigators moved the search area hundreds of kilometres north.
But there's no guarantee that the plane maintained that speed for hours before going down.
"The problem is, we're dealing with probabilities โ estimates," Brown said of the Inmarsat data.
"It's where they THINK the plane went down."
Or as Captain Ross "Rusty" Aimer, a former pilot who now runs Aero Consulting Experts, put it: "Until we find a positive concrete shred of evidence โ a piece of the aircraft โ everything else is just conjecture, and it could be totally wrong. So far, the satellite calculations have only directed us to oceanic garbage dumps."
Australian officials have expressed increasing pessimism in recent days. Angus Houston, who heads the joint agency coordinating the multinational search effort out of Australia, said investigators are using computer modeling to determine the plane's final location, but two key variables needed to calculate that more precisely are unknown: the aircraft's altitude and speed.
"The starting point whenever you do a search and rescue is the last known position of the vehicle or the aircraft," Houston said Tuesday.
"In this particular case, the last known position was a long, long way from where the aircraft appears to have gone."