Plane missing with 236 people on board

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-08/malaysia-airlines-lost-contact-with-plane/5307888

 

Malaysia Airlines says one of its planes has gone missing on the way from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 239 people on board.

A statement from the airline says flight MH370 lost contact with air traffic controllers at 2:40am local time, just over two hours into the flight.

 

The plane, a Boeing 777-200, left Kuala Lumpur at 12:41am on Saturday, and had been due to arrive in Beijing at 6:30am local time.

The company says the plane was carrying 227 passengers, including two infants, and 12 crew members.

The airline says it is contacting the next-of-kin of all passengers and crew, which includes people of 13 different nationalities.

In a statement on the airline's website, group chief executive officer Ahmad Jauhari Yahya said the airline was working with authorities to locate the aircraft.

 

"Focus of the airline is to work with the emergency responders and authorities and mobilise its full support," the statement said.

"Our thoughts and prayers are with all affected passengers and crew and their family members."

The airline says it will provide regular updates on its website.

The ABC understand Malaysia Airlines will hold a press conference on the incident shortly.

 

Message 1 of 688
Latest reply
687 REPLIES 687

Re: Plane missing with 236 people on board


@*jimmy1717* wrote:

Something interesting...this thread has 840 posts. The same thread on the ebayUS has 844 replies.

 

And the OP is Paints US counterpart.

 

http://community.ebay.com/t5/The-Soapbox/Breaking-News-Missing-Malaysian-Flight/td-p/19719792/page/2...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b5aW08ivHU

Message 541 of 688
Latest reply

Re: Plane missing with 236 people on board

 

"I have no argument against that, She-el but the way other posters are dissed by inferring their comments are less than intelligent, indeed called nutty and other rude terms, is arrogance beyond belief!"

 

I would assert that most of what is posted by P007 is nutty beyond belief, and lacking in knowledge  and logic.

Not arrogance on my part but  based upon  a little expertise/experience in the field of a aviation, engineering, crash beacon location, and military operations all of which would be foreign to the kernel!.

 

"Especially when all the technological information and "intelligent" discussion has not got anyone one iota closer to the planes whereabouts."

Like P007 theories  IF, that is nonsense. The  various information collected and data interpretation  by the authorities  have arrived at a track,  and likely area  for the aircraft to have ditched.

nษฅยบษพ

 

Message 542 of 688
Latest reply

Re: Plane missing with 236 people on board

 

I wrote: 

To me that seems like a reasonably intelligent conversation.

 

Icy wrote:

I have no argument against that, She-el but the way other posters are dissed by inferring their comments are less than intelligent, indeed called nutty and other rude terms, is arrogance beyond belief!

 

 

 

 

You mean comments like this;?

 

WOBBLE    [Clap!]    DOPPLER     [clap!]     COMPUTATION     [wiggle]     SHIFT     [clap!!] :smileylol:

 

 .....but same as icy has put to sheheffalump....have youse found the plane yet?

Message 543 of 688
Latest reply

Re: Plane missing with 236 people on board

It looks like some tidying has been done over here and your post has dropped back to 540, jimmy. Are they as house proud in the US? ๐Ÿ™‚
Message 544 of 688
Latest reply

Re: Plane missing with 236 people on board

this whole 'affair' is very, very suss-pishuss.........planes go 'missing'............posts go 'missing'...........*tsk tsk*

Message 545 of 688
Latest reply

Re: Plane missing with 236 people on board

to the sheheffalump: you stated ..."the OTHR is set up to pick up objects coming towards it or goingaway  from it, not travelling past it."

 

what a load of bunkum!!

at some point the plane would have had to 'move away' *geez

 

Radar aside.....WHAT ABOUT THE

 

        200 PLUS SATELLITES UP THERE

               ORBITING OUR PLANET                               

                             24/7.....one of these must have tracking details of our missing plane.....either in flight (if it was actually in flight) ....or pics of it landing somewhere like debris from crashing? (if it did in fact crash) 

 

Don't shoot me but isn't the correct term in geosynchronous orbit ....?

where satellites are programmed to each cover a particular area of the planet Earth.....so we end up with a 'map' of data. 

 

 

We don't need radar.

Satellites would have seen 'our' plane for sure

 

 

why have we not been told the truth?

Message 546 of 688
Latest reply

Re: Plane missing with 236 people on board

to colic:   who said "...

Satellites would not have been tracking the plane

 

Satellites only take pictures of what they are programmed to take pictures of.....and it's generally not Planes.......

 

It would be impossible to take and store pictures of random items worldwide that they are not targeted to take pictures

 

of.

 

The satellite pictures that are being provided now looking for wreckage have been taken only after retargetting the

 

satellites to the search areas....... well and truly after the fact..........etc etc

..........................................................................................................................................................................................................

 

these satellites can be controlled from planet Earth. They often use these satellites for spying on other countries and therefore need to be able to point/face- whatever the term used is i do not care(!).....towards whatever it is that 'they' want to W-a-t-c-h and monitor.

 

*geez.

 

It does not take 4 weeks to re-target a friggin state of the art, high tech space cadet satellite.

It takes 5 mins for a signal from Earth to Mars to control the CURIOSITY ROVER!! so would not take days nor weeks to retarget one or three or fifty of the 200 plus satellites available in order to locate and take pics of the missing plane.

 

 

unless, as I originally proposed much earlier on, is infact true....that our missing plane was the target of a missile of some sort....OR 'they' simply don't want us to know 'where' our plane and all on board ended up.

 

End of story.

 

Message 547 of 688
Latest reply

Re: Plane missing with 236 people on board

paintsew007 wrote:: so would not take days nor weeks to retarget one or three or fifty of the 200 plus satellites available in order to locate and take pics of the missing plane.

 

 

How would they know to reprogram or whatever when they didn't know the plane was missing??

 

By the time they knew, what were these 200 odd satejlites meant to take a photo of ?

_________________________________________________________

You can't please all the people all the time, so now I just please myself


Message 548 of 688
Latest reply

Re: Plane missing with 236 people on board


@2106greencat wrote:

painspew wrote:: so would not take days nor weeks to retarget one or three or fifty of the 200 plus satellites available in order to locate and take pics of the missing plane.

 

 

How would they know to reprogram or whatever when they didn't know the plane was missing??

 

By the time they knew, what were these 200 odd satejlites meant to take a photo of ?


Do all those satellites take photos?

Message 549 of 688
Latest reply

Re: Plane missing with 236 people on board

 

For a few days now I've been thinking, in my funny little unresearched way ... I wonder if they're not finding the plane because that's not where it is?

 

This morning's headline:

 

Is the MH370 Even In The Indian Ocean?

 

Not a single piece of wreckage from the lost plane has been found, not even after a new analysis led investigators to change the focus of their search yet again. The latest search area is based on extremely limited satellite data combined with radar data taken some five hours before the plane is believed to have gone down. It is, as one search official said, "a very inexact science."

 

Last week, using revised estimates of how fast the plane was traveling when it left the Malacca strait, investigators moved the search area hundreds of kilometres north.

 

But there's no guarantee that the plane maintained that speed for hours before going down.

 

"The problem is, we're dealing with probabilities โ€” estimates," Brown said of the Inmarsat data.

 

"It's where they THINK the plane went down."

 

Or as Captain Ross "Rusty" Aimer, a former pilot who now runs Aero Consulting Experts, put it: "Until we find a positive concrete shred of evidence โ€” a piece of the aircraft โ€” everything else is just conjecture, and it could be totally wrong. So far, the satellite calculations have only directed us to oceanic garbage dumps."

 

Australian officials have expressed increasing pessimism in recent days. Angus Houston, who heads the joint agency coordinating the multinational search effort out of Australia, said investigators are using computer modeling to determine the plane's final location, but two key variables needed to calculate that more precisely are unknown: the aircraft's altitude and speed.

 

"The starting point whenever you do a search and rescue is the last known position of the vehicle or the aircraft," Houston said Tuesday.

 

"In this particular case, the last known position was a long, long way from where the aircraft appears to have gone."

 

Click Here For Entire Article

 

 

Message 550 of 688
Latest reply