Radio host Ben Fordham's claims Ms Gillard was being investigated by police

[azureline**]

2GB host Ben Fordham told his listeners today he wanted to correct comments made by Ms Gillard during an interview in March that canvassed the AWU case.

Fordham said the police were still taking statements and had asked him to make a formal statement relating to the March 7 interview.

Courier mail today.

:^O really? would police really do that?

[lightningdance]

"I have done nothing wrong"

"There will be no carbon tax under a government I lead"

Lies are a little fortress; inside them you can feel safe and powerful. Through your little fortress of lies you try to run your life and manipulate others.

But the fortress needs walls, so you build some. These are the justifications for your lies. You know, like you are doing this to protect someone you love, to keep them from feeling pain. Whatever works, just so you feel okay about the lies.

WM. PAUL YOUNG, The Shack

[izabsmiling]

Will wait for the facts to come out .

Meanwhile we have this which it seems some laugh off 

A CO-FOUNDER of the One Nation Party, David Ettridge, is planning to sue federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott for damages of more than $1.5 million.

Mr Ettridge has accused Mr Abbott of acting unlawfully in 1998 by assisting and encouraging litigation against One Nation in the Queensland courts.

He alleges the court action was false and malicious and the resulting damage affected him greatly.

He also accuses Mr Abbott of attempting to pervert the course of justice by providing lawyers “to propel those false claims through the courts”.

“I will be filing a claim against Tony Abbott in the Brisbane Supreme Court seeking damages in excess of $1.5 million,” Mr Ettridge told AAP on Tuesday.

“I will also be asking the court to compel Mr Abbott to release the names of the people who contributed to Mr Abbott’s ‘Australians for Honest Politics Trust’, so the trust can be fully examined for whatever contribution it made to any unlawful activity at that time.”

Mr Ettridge said he would be alleging that those donors became co-conspirators in Mr Abbott’s actions.

He said Mr Abbott should face the allegations before he seeks to become Australia’s next prime minister.

If my claims are found by the court to be true then Mr Abbott may need to step aside and avoid bringing any embarrassment to the highest public office in Australia.

“For Mr Abbott, this is karma and I expect to be inundated by lawyers offering their services pro bono so I receive justice in this matter”.

Comment has been sought from Mr Abbott. - AAP

 http://www.australiantimes.co.uk/news/in-australia/one-nation-co-founder-to-sue-tony-abbott-for-1-5m...

[lakeedge]

Will wait for the facts to come out .

Meanwhile we have this which it seems some laugh off 

A CO-FOUNDER of the One Nation Party, David Ettridge, is planning to sue federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott for damages of more than $1.5 million.

Mr Ettridge has accused Mr Abbott of acting unlawfully in 1998 by assisting and encouraging litigation against One Nation in the Queensland courts.

He alleges the court action was false and malicious and the resulting damage affected him greatly.

He also accuses Mr Abbott of attempting to pervert the course of justice by providing lawyers “to propel those false claims through the courts”.

“I will be filing a claim against Tony Abbott in the Brisbane Supreme Court seeking damages in excess of $1.5 million,” Mr Ettridge told AAP on Tuesday.

“I will also be asking the court to compel Mr Abbott to release the names of the people who contributed to Mr Abbott’s ‘Australians for Honest Politics Trust’, so the trust can be fully examined for whatever contribution it made to any unlawful activity at that time.”

Mr Ettridge said he would be alleging that those donors became co-conspirators in Mr Abbott’s actions.

He said Mr Abbott should face the allegations before he seeks to become Australia’s next prime minister.

If my claims are found by the court to be true then Mr Abbott may need to step aside and avoid bringing any embarrassment to the highest public office in Australia.

“For Mr Abbott, this is karma and I expect to be inundated by lawyers offering their services pro bono so I receive justice in this matter”.

Comment has been sought from Mr Abbott. - AAP

 http://www.australiantimes.co.uk/news/in-australia/one-nation-co-founder-to-sue-tony-abbott-for-1-5m...

.

That has been posted before & a link was put up with the initial inquiry & findings clearing ALL parties Including Mr Abbot of any wrongdoing.

[izabsmiling]

Going by what the man himself has said ...I don't understand how that could be the case.

[lakeland27]

the courts will decide if he's guilty or not.

i notice there is no case against ms gillard. is that why fordham and the usual IPA luvvies are making up porkies again ? most likely it is.

[izabsmiling]

the courts will decide if he's guilty or not.

that's right.

[lakeedge]

Going by what the man himself has said ...I don't understand how that could be the case.

.

Download Hanson-ettridge-inquiry-2003 The Australian Electoral Commission enquired into the trust fund entity at the centre of Mr Abbott's...

Here are the findings & the conclusion.

FINDINGS           

The Commission is of the opinion that no misconduct or other impropriety has been shown to have asso...

[lakeland27]

the findings are irelevent now. this is a new case, and although its about the same matter it isn't the same action. ettridge much as i disagree with his politics has a genuine grievance that will be heard .

[newstart2380]

the findings are irelevent now. this is a new case, and although its about the same matter it isn't the same action. ettridge much as i disagree with his politics has a genuine grievance that will be heard .

Come on LL, the original findings are not irrelevant, it will just reopen the case. ettridge is just peed off because he spent some time in gaol and the food was not to his liking. he knows they wont find any other conclusion other then the one already decided. who foots the bill for these costs because he doesn't care. this is a personal issue and he is determined to slander TA name and WE all will pay the court costs.

This is from a man who cares about the electorate (not)

[lightningdance]

Posting this court case that has been heard & Abbott has been cleared is a good way to hijack a thread. Wishful thinking that some new evidence will incriminate Abbott.

The fact remains that Gillard is a person of interest, she may not have been questioned yet but that means nothing.

When the police have enough evidence to move forward it won't matter because Gillard will be gone, the case will be heard outside of politics, same as Thomson & Slipper.

These people will no longer be relevent, consigned to the scrapheap.