on โ23-04-2013 08:18 PM
2GB host Ben Fordham told his listeners today he wanted to correct comments made by Ms Gillard during an interview in March that canvassed the AWU case.
Fordham said the police were still taking statements and had asked him to make a formal statement relating to the March 7 interview.
Courier mail today.
:^O really? would police really do that?
on โ24-04-2013 10:51 AM
The AEC is not a court, they were looking into how the matter may or may not have breached AEC rules. Etteridge now is going after Abbott for damages caused by the attack on One Nation, not about any AEC rules.
Not saying I agree with any of the actions, just commenting.
on โ24-04-2013 10:52 AM
NS, you are OK to Slander David Ettridge and infer if/when/who can exercise their right to use our Justice system ?
cases get retried ...maybe in this case their is more 'evidence' ? who knows.
on โ24-04-2013 10:54 AM
what evidence do we have to go with the OP at this stage ?
so far there isn't even a case yet
on โ24-04-2013 10:58 AM
what evidence do we have to go with the OP at this stage ?
so far there isn't even a case yet
None, but O'Farrell did a Gonski deal yesterday.
That's all the Gillarhaters need. Anything is better than positive news.
on โ24-04-2013 10:59 AM
the AEC commission has limited powers. they do not adjudicate on criminal matters such as the case against Mr Abbott. if ettridge and hanson were not released and the convictions not quashed abbott might not have a case to answer. the fact that they were released means he most likely does. As would anyone who by their actions prevents another from earning a living.. .
on โ24-04-2013 11:00 AM
Freaki, that deserves to be posted with A positive thread title
on โ24-04-2013 11:09 AM
There is an ongoing investigation into the matter. The police have widened their investigation & are now interviewing others outside the initial investigation.
When they acquire enough evidence they will then start to call people in for questioning.
This core of the case is the thieving of union members funds. She set up the slush fund that facillitated this theft & hundreds of thousands of dollars was scammed to her ex union lover, she "resigned" from the law firm after the partners lost trust in her, an exit interview was conducted to protect the firm, this evidence has now been "lost".
The thing is, the serious thing is, the PM of this country is under a cloud, an investigation is being run at this time, the media, who had been cowed into not really reporting on this & the sick making reply of Peter Van Onselen saying" I believe you didn't do it", are waking up & looking at this mess again because they know Gillard will no longer be PM after the election.
on โ24-04-2013 11:17 AM
any links evidencing a genuine case ? journalists opinions and machinations count for nothing but smear tactics. where is the police statement re gillard ? i'm sure you would have posted it
If it existed ๐
on โ24-04-2013 11:24 AM
NS, you are OK to Slander David Ettridge and infer if/when/who can exercise their right to use our Justice system ?
cases get retried ...maybe in this case their is more 'evidence' ? who knows.
I did not slander ettridge, I just said he was peed off because he went to gaol and didn't like the food (I wouldn't either I guess).
I was replying to the comment below by LL
LL said I quote "the findings are irelevent now. this is a new case, and although its about the same matter it isn't the same action. ettridge much as i disagree with his politics has a genuine grievance that will be heard "
on โ24-04-2013 12:07 PM
Tony Abbott dismisses One Nation co-founder's allegations of financial and personal ruin