@rogespeed wrote:
Mitigation and response to detected coronavirus infections is thankfully proving effective , but tends to be reactionary , so what is the situation in the wild ?
Undetected infections ? self recovered ? undetected asymptotic cases ? Who can say at this time.
A random sample of residents in one area might prove interesting and validate to an improved extent current successes , also reduce any surprises.
A representative population group of say 1000 people residing in the same suburb of Sydney , but not having any coronavirus interventions therein as per the immediate area
Notification of intent to test on a relaxed Saturday afternoon , door to door knock, voluntary only , id and address confirmed, $100 thanks for co-operation per person including children , to assist with re-prioritising activities and maintain enthusiasm for the project.
Sort of like a clinical double blind test - a baseline
Any pertinent comments ?
Rogespeed wrote
Simplified syntax
Find out how effective mitigation has been by testing everyone within a city suburb on the same day as a representitive data set
never infected,
previously infected but not now
infected and shedding but showing no symptoms
infected and showing symptoms,
Deceased ( but unknown)
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
atheism is a non prophet organization
