on 29-06-2013 11:09 AM
Dennis Muller writes about ethical lapses by journalists
disclosure: academic not political writer
I have posted the first part of the article.
An integral power of the media is that of portrayal: the act of determining how people, events, ideas and organisations are described to the public, and therefore how they are perceived by the public. In this way, the media constructs for us our understanding of the world beyond our personal knowledge and experience.
For those of us who have never met Julia Gillard, our perceptions of her are based almost entirely on what we see, hear and read of her in the media. These perceptions are then reflected in public opinion polling, and the publication of these poll results tends to reinforce the perceptions. It becomes a self-perpetuating cycle.
Eventually, in this case, the poll results got so bad that Gillard’s parliamentary colleagues replaced her as Labor leader with Kevin Rudd.
So of course it is true to say the media played a part in the demise of Gillard as prime minister. The harder question is: did the media play a part that was ethically wrong?
Some elements of the media, notably commercial radio talkback shock jocks Alan Jones, Ray Hadley and Chris Smith, clearly did. Their depictions of, and remarks about, Gillard were disgustingly offensive. Not only were they sexist, extremist and malicious, but in Jones’s case involved encouragement of the idea that the prime minister should be dumped at sea.
on 29-06-2013 07:00 PM
Hello , Did you read all of the OP?
It is regarding media ethics .Do you dislike Julia Gillard that much that you aren't prepared to read about the impact of media gone bad by someone who knows how it should be and the impact the media has ?
Would you condone a Dr breaking his code of ethics because you don't like his patient ?
No one is seriously comparing the ethics of the media (run by sales) and doctors hopefully run by more a more altruistic agenda?
Gillard was pushed to the forefront to get votes. She got enough to just get in, thanks to the indies.
Rudd announces a some weeks ago he's had an epiphany, same sex marriage is okay by him, and it's taken this long for the labor *power players* to realise he's their best hope at the next bite of the cherry, because Tony ain't going to budge.
They just keep jumping to the next best thing instead of sticking to policies and their Labor agenda.
on 29-06-2013 07:02 PM
it might be too balanced and sensible for some
on 29-06-2013 07:05 PM
Yeah, you go with that one.
on 29-06-2013 07:08 PM
what you going with ? umm is it OK for me to add your id to my posts tonight ?
on 29-06-2013 07:11 PM
let me know if it is or what I should refer to you as if not your id .Last time I replied to you and said Nevyn you asked me why I mentioned your id ? Don't wish to upset you
on 29-06-2013 07:14 PM
Okay, creepy.
I only post with this ID. And you probably responded to someone else quoting my post.
on 29-06-2013 07:25 PM
Lol Iza, it's permanently upset, a perpetual bad day at work :^O
on 29-06-2013 07:34 PM
And the personal attacks start.
I don't hold the same opinion so I can be referred to in the third person, and as an IT?
You don't want to discuss the issue or feel threatened by my opinion, don't post. Put me on ignore (please)
And some wonder why it's so dead in here.
on 29-06-2013 07:35 PM
And I don't work, so another fail for you.
on 29-06-2013 07:50 PM
Maybe you should?