on 12-04-2015 12:08 PM
THE UN’s World Health Organisation has warned that too many women in developing and wealthy countries are resorting unnecessarily to caesarean sections to give birth.
Other pregnant women with a real medical need for a C-section simply do not have access to the operation, the WHO added.
“In a lot of developing and developed countries, there is really an epidemic of caesarean sections, even when there is no medical need,” said Marleen Temmerman, director of the WHO’s reproductive health department.
In countries like Brazil, where some 53 per cent of births are by C-section according to WHO figures, “there is a culture of ‘let’s go for caesarean’,” Temmerman added.
According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, almost one in three babies were born via caesarean section in 2011.
Rates have risen sharply in Australia over the past two decades - from 18 percent in 1991 to 32 percent in 2011.
C-sections should only be considered in cases of risk to the mother and her unborn child.
I question the ethics of a Surgeon who engages in this type of surgery, simply for cosmetic reasons or to fit in with an agenda.
on 12-04-2015 12:54 PM
the term 'elective c section' can be a bit misleading - it is applied to any planned c section regardless of the necessity.
ok. thanks.
by elective i meant unnecessary c-sections -
as per the OP.
on 12-04-2015 01:48 PM
on 12-04-2015 01:51 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:
@vicr3000 wrote:
I couldn't give a carp about C section or natural birth. That's up to the parents / mother to decide.
It's the fact the UN is telling people what they should do.
Next they will be telling women they can't have abortions.what's wrong with that?
parents need to have a good understanding
re the risks to the babies associated with c-sections.
Everyone I know who had a c-section did not make that choice as a whim. They would all have preferred to have been able to safely deliver the child naturally.
on 12-04-2015 01:52 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:the term 'elective c section' can be a bit misleading - it is applied to any planned c section regardless of the necessity.
ok. thanks.
by elective i meant unnecessary c-sections -
as per the OP.
To have an elective c-section it has to be organised (and therefore recommended) by a doctor meaning he/she has decided that it is in the best interests of the mother and baby already - whatever those interests are.
Who then decides what is "unnecessary"? Certainly in our system, patient confidentiality does not give that right (or power) to any third party.
Marina.
on 12-04-2015 02:00 PM
@pct001wine wrote:Wondering whether the increase in C-sections is linked to the increasing concern by medical professionals about malpractice claims ...?
It most definitely is - I know several who have transferred all their assets to their spouses/family members because they are so afraid. We live in an increasingly litigious society that says someone is to blame for every disaster, and therefore must be held accountable.
Just looking at the other side of the coin for a moment, I personally know a woman who blames her obstetrician for "robbing me of the birthing experience" when he went ahead with an emergency c-section when things weren't progressing as they should. She didn't threaten to sue, but I can't help wondering how she would have felt if he'd let things proceed and the baby had been born with birth-related problems or worse.
Marina.
on 12-04-2015 02:06 PM
Any person who doesn't off load assets etc to others or other out of reach structures is crazy.
I think even normal business people should do it now.
"I personally know a woman who blames her obstetrician for "robbing me of the birthing experience" when he went ahead with an emergency c-section when things weren't progressing as they should. She didn't threaten to sue, but I can't help wondering how she would have felt if he'd let things proceed and the baby had been born with birth-related problems or worse."
A very good example.
Trying to do the right thing but still in the poo !
12-04-2015 02:08 PM - edited 12-04-2015 02:10 PM
I think this has been an issue for awhile in Western countries - not good.
on 12-04-2015 02:10 PM
To have an elective c-section it has to be organised (and therefore recommended) by a doctor meaning he/she has decided that it is in the best interests of the mother and baby already - whatever those interests are.
are you saying there is no such thing
as a personal choice when it comes to
electing a c-section? ie some women
simply dont want to go through vaginal
delivery?
on 12-04-2015 02:12 PM
are you saying there is no such thing
as a personal choice when it comes to
electing a c-section? ie some women
simply dont want to go through vaginal
delivery?
For most Drs/specialists that wouldn't get you a c-section would it? A pregnant women simply stating her personal preference is not to have a vaginal delivery - without any health concerns relating to having one?
on 12-04-2015 02:14 PM
@vicr3000 wrote:
Bludy UN telling everyone what to do again.
Wish they would concentrate on the really important stuff - like not ignoring Ebola warning signs from Professionals
and so causing the biggest outbreak ever !!!
Not correct.
THE UN’s World Health Organisation has warned that too many women in developing and wealthy countries are resorting unnecessarily to caesarean sections to give birth.