on 19-04-2013 03:00 PM
on 21-04-2013 12:36 PM
stop stealing my lines freaky
on 21-04-2013 12:41 PM
stop stealing my lines freaky
I noticed that too late.
Chuckled that everyone stopped at the same post :^O
A classic for the chuckles thread, considering the topic is Rolf :^O
on 21-04-2013 02:31 PM
Well unless he is charged, tried and convicted of a crime he is innocent.
Unless the justice system has changed that is?
on 21-04-2013 03:26 PM
This is what the media are reporting:
THE Australian entertainer arrested on suspicion of alleged sexual offences has been named in the British press as Rolf Harris.
iza has pointed out I omitted the word suspicion.
I don't see that the media could be sued by Rolf, for defamation for making the above statement, as Bob suggested.
on 21-04-2013 03:33 PM
Well unless he is charged, tried and convicted of a crime he is innocent.
Unless the justice system has changed that is?
What Margo said. Also I don't know if this has been mentioned as I haven't read every post, but I think it was the ABC news that was saying its one woman that is making allegations against him, not child abuse related.
on 21-04-2013 03:34 PM
Sorry cut off the last line it should read that we know of at this stage. The details are sketchy but he has not been charged as of yet.
on 21-04-2013 04:08 PM
He was bailed and due to appear in court in May. That was made public awhile ago, before they named him.
....he had been arrested over historic sex abuse allegations.
Harris’s accuser is a woman who claims she was sexually assaulted by him when she was a teenager.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2311476/Rolf-Harris-arrest-Veteran-entertainer-outed-histori...
on 21-04-2013 04:31 PM
I don't think that the media reporting is fair to anyone.
Everybody could find out who an 82 year old Australian entertainer living in the UK was with a quick Google. That information absolutely negated the "confidentiality" of Harris' identity. It's set him up for horrendous allegations and suspicions.
Now, IF he is a child molester ... send him through the courts and give him an appropriate sentence.
IF he molested a woman ... send him through the courts and give him an appropriate sentence.
BUT, FGS, name the crime. Tell us what is alleged. Don't leave us (and him) wondering. It's not fair.
Millions of people are wondering now ... "did he molest children?" ...
The police have ... in my opinion ... POTENTIALLY ... set up a man in his 80s, who has been widely respected for decades to public condemnation. He's been reportedly suicidal about this ...
I think it's well past time that they give the details.
on 21-04-2013 04:49 PM
I don't think anything can be gained by giving more details at this stage. He will appear in court again next month, that is not very long to wait.
If they do give details and even if he is found not guilty people will still associate him with those details.
Why will millions of people be wondering - did he molest children? It was made quite clear from the beginning he was not arrested in association with Jimmy Savile. There are 3 parts to Operation Yewtree. Rolf fell into the third part - Others - who had celebrity status at the time.
There is 1 woman who has made allegations against Rolf.
Harris’s accuser is a woman who claims she was sexually assaulted by him when she was a teenager.
Link in my post above.
One of the other celebrities arrested, was not charged as the person who made the allegations withdrew them.
on 21-04-2013 10:24 PM
Well unless he is charged, tried and convicted of a crime he is innocent.
Unless the justice system has changed that is?
Ditto....