on โ03-09-2014 08:44 AM
on โ03-09-2014 12:08 PM - last edited on โ03-09-2014 12:42 PM by luna-2304
It's Mr Whish-Wilson not Ms. His name is Peter and he's known as the senator surfer. He was formally in defence force and banking and I think he was working for Merril Lynch when the WTC towers were attacked.
No offence, just adding some info about the senator.
on โ03-09-2014 12:18 PM
on โ03-09-2014 12:36 PM
@lane-ends wrote:terrorism is to intimidate by overt use of deliberate terror tactics. Casualities as collateral, even if by poor judgement and negligence is not the deliberate use of terror.
Hence the tern is being used correctly. It is incorrect to use against peacekeeping forces.
It is about terror being used as intent not as a consequence
So what is the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter.
Was EOKA a terrorist organization?
Was Ergun a terrorist organization
Were the men who fought in the Easter Uprising in Ireland in 1916 terrorists?
Was the Coalition of the Willing a peacekeeping force?
on โ03-09-2014 12:52 PM
It is about terror being used as intent not as a consequence
this would have to be one of the most intelligent
responses i have seen here in a long time.
i'd put you up there with Monman
IMO
on โ03-09-2014 01:05 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:It is about terror being used as intent not as a consequence
this would have to be one of the most intelligent
responses i have seen here in a long time.
i'd put you up there with Monman
IMO
So was the bombing of Guernica http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Guernica an act of terrorism, or was the terror and destruction unleashed on defenceless civillians there merely the consequence of a legitimate act of war - and does the same answer apply to the London Blitz and the bombing of Dresden?
on โ03-09-2014 01:29 PM
Something has to be done about ISIL but we have no right to claim any moral high grounds. There were plenty of atrocities committed by people on "our side" in not so distant past.
U.S. soldier who raped 14-year-old girl before killing her and her family
on โ03-09-2014 01:32 PM
Hello, everyone. This discussion is getting a little heated. Could we please communicate with a more civil tone. Thanks!
โ03-09-2014 01:45 PM - edited โ03-09-2014 01:49 PM
@***super_nova*** wrote:
Thats 2010
How about staying in the year 2014 and on topic and the topic is Second US journalist beheaded.. Thank you
... What are your thoughts on the beheading?
on โ03-09-2014 01:51 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@*julia*2010 wrote:It is about terror being used as intent not as a consequence
this would have to be one of the most intelligent
responses i have seen here in a long time.
i'd put you up there with Monman
IMO
So was the bombing of Guernica http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Guernica an act of terrorism, or was the terror and destruction unleashed on defenceless civillians there merely the consequence of a legitimate act of war - and does the same answer apply to the London Blitz and the bombing of Dresden?
Geez thats 1937 She El... Is it possible to stay on the topic of the beheading etc and the year 2014 ๐
โ03-09-2014 01:59 PM - edited โ03-09-2014 02:00 PM
@nero_wulf wrote:
@***super_nova*** wrote:
Thats 2010
How about staying in the year 2014 and on topic and the topic is Second US journalist beheaded.. Thank you
... What are your thoughts on the beheading?
Killing unarmed civilians is horrible be it now or 4 years ago. Is beheading a man worse than killing whole family, including children, raping the 14 years old and setting her body on fire? The question is if beheading 2 journalist make all Muslims barbarians, by the ame logic, what does the rape and massacre make Americans?
It should not be us = "the civilised" world against them = "Muslims". It is us all against people who will stop at nothing to get what they want; be it Putin or ISIL.